![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
I'll be around later with part 2 of this week's Robinson Recap double bill, which will also be my last for a few weeks, owing to the horse racing.
![Mad :x](./images/smilies/icon_mad.gif)
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
![Crying or Very Sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
Oh well.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Moderator: James Robinson
Dude, "Heather Badcock, Konstadinos Sfyris and 67 other guests" attending suggests you really don't need to say any more.Kirk Bevins wrote:I'm excited about today's episode as someone I have known for a long time is the challenger. He is also an apterite. I will say no more.
Some people don't have facebook and some people, like James, were clearly unaware.Matt Morrison wrote:Dude, "Heather Badcock, Konstadinos Sfyris and 67 other guests" attending suggests you really don't need to say any more.Kirk Bevins wrote:I'm excited about today's episode as someone I have known for a long time is the challenger. He is also an apterite. I will say no more.
Facebook is killing Countdown.Kirk Bevins wrote:Some people don't have facebook and some people, like James, were clearly unaware.Matt Morrison wrote:Dude, "Heather Badcock, Konstadinos Sfyris and 67 other guests" attending suggests you really don't need to say any more.Kirk Bevins wrote:I'm excited about today's episode as someone I have known for a long time is the challenger. He is also an apterite. I will say no more.
Yes, I was compeltely unaware. Oh well.Kirk Bevins wrote:Some people don't have facebook and some people, like James, were clearly unaware.Matt Morrison wrote:Dude, "Heather Badcock, Konstadinos Sfyris and 67 other guests" attending suggests you really don't need to say any more.Kirk Bevins wrote:I'm excited about today's episode as someone I have known for a long time is the challenger. He is also an apterite. I will say no more.
I love it how you're desperate to know even though it'll be on in an hour. I think you can wait.James Robinson wrote:(pm me if necessary)
Yeah, it's on in an hour for those of you who have a TV in your vicinity, but for me, I have to wait until at least 6pm, probably nearer 7pm, before I can watch it, so the word torture springs to mind.Kirk Bevins wrote:I love it how you're desperate to know even though it'll be on in an hour. I think you can wait.James Robinson wrote:(pm me if necessary)
Thanks, Charlie.Charlie Reams wrote:It's Josh Hurst.
Wrong channel. Try one of Richard Desmond's cultural offerings.tomrowell wrote:Impatient cunts
You must be thinking of In-patient Cunts, which I believe is a regular fixture on one of the weird medical channels my sister loves to watch.Brian Moore wrote:Wrong channel. Try one of Richard Desmond's cultural offerings.tomrowell wrote:Impatient cunts
Did you not know what happens Kirk? Expected you to have been in the audience, no?Kirk Bevins wrote:Nice solid performance, Tom, well done. Just remember to write down your numbers solution. Oh, and don't forget to look for the buzzer [/sudbery].
I had it as well! Chose not to risk it if he had declared first i would have done!Matt Morrison wrote:R13 alternate
You blouse, you were about 8000 points ahead haha! Ah well - here's to plenty more opportunities to declare rude words in the rest of your games...tomrowell wrote:I had it as well! Chose not to risk it if he had declared first i would have done!Matt Morrison wrote:R13 alternate
That's what Rachel did, Helen.Helen James wrote:Did anyone get 1st numbers game? I'm not good at maths, but think this may be right:
9-5 = 4 x 8 = 32 x 10 = 320 + 6 = 326 x 3 = 978
Not sure if this right though, or if I copied the numbers down right. Think it was 5, 3, 10, 6, 8 & 9 (target 978)
Yeah I went to watch him but I can still post congratulatory messages on here too you knowMatt Morrison wrote: Did you not know what happens Kirk? Expected you to have been in the audience, no?
On the basis that if I can get it in time it must be easy:Jon Corby wrote:(BTW I still can't see the 'really easy' 979 that Jeff (and presumably you Tom?) had)
Oh, okay. Not that straightforward, is it?Brian Moore wrote:On the basis that if I can get it in time it must be easy:Jon Corby wrote:(BTW I still can't see the 'really easy' 979 that Jeff (and presumably you Tom?) had)
((6+5) x 9 x 10) - (8 + 3) = 979
Fair point, but looking at it as (11 x 9 x 10) - 11, all the numbers are obvious, hence Jeff's offer of his "really easy" 979, I guess. It was worth it for Rachel's put-down.Jon Corby wrote:Oh, okay. Not that straightforward, is it?Brian Moore wrote:On the basis that if I can get it in time it must be easy:Jon Corby wrote:(BTW I still can't see the 'really easy' 979 that Jeff (and presumably you Tom?) had)
((6+5) x 9 x 10) - (8 + 3) = 979
Was that when she said "You're a cunt Jeff. I'm going to kill you"?Brian Moore wrote:Fair point, but looking at it as (11 x 9 x 10) - 11, all the numbers are obvious, hence Jeff's offer of his "really easy" 979, I guess. It was worth it for Rachel's put-down.