Page 1 of 1

Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:37 pm
by James Robinson
So, Edward is now sitting comfortably in the champions' chair following his brilliant win yesterday.

Interestingly, his 115 is the highest debut score for any contestant since a certain Jack Hurst's 114, back in October. Is that an omen, I wonder :?:

I'll be back later with the Robinson Recap. ;) :) :D

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:38 pm
by Matt Morrison
James Robinson wrote:Interestingly, his 115 is the highest debut score for any contestant since a certain Jack Hurst's 114, back in October. Is that an omen, I wonder :?:
115 is higher than 114 though, I don't get it.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 2:14 pm
by James Robinson
Matt Morrison wrote:
James Robinson wrote:Interestingly, his 115 is the highest debut score for any contestant since a certain Jack Hurst's 114, back in October. Is that an omen, I wonder :?:
115 is higher than 114 though, I don't get it.
Basically, I couldn't think of any higher from the recent past. I think the most recent is probably Andrew Hulme's 133, but since he didn't win his series, I thought Edward might be happier with that statistic, even if it is slightly flawed. :)

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:18 pm
by Adam Gillard
Edward is so cool! Although I'm confused as to how to pronounce his surname. Jeff started with [mˈkʌlə] and then moved on to [mˈkʌlək]. The other bloke seems very robotic sitting opposite Edward.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:32 pm
by Michael Wallace
Adam Gillard wrote:Edward is so cool! Although I'm confused as to how to pronounce his surname. Jeff started with [mˈkʌlə] and then moved on to [mˈkʌlək]. The other bloke seems very robotic sitting opposite Edward.
Apterous is killing robots.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:40 pm
by Peter Mabey
Equallers: STOOLIES, VELETA, UPSTREAM for SOLIDEST, ZEALOT, TEMPURAS respectively.
And UNGUENT to equal NEUTRON.
Alternative 3rd numbers (100-6)x(5+3)=752

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:50 pm
by Adam Gillard
David's having a STINKER, but at least he showed some emotion this round.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:52 pm
by Adam Gillard
Stinker of a conundrum too. I was nowhere near it.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:56 pm
by Josh Hurst
Wp again Cullen. I love how vocal the audience were today, a lot of oooooohs and aaaahhhhsss. Greg Wallace is awesome, probably my 2nd fave DC guest.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:19 pm
by Marcus Hares
Another top notch performance Ed - well played. That very tough conundrum appears to be invalid on Lexplorer so must be one of the new additions to the new dictionary.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:26 pm
by Martin Long
Watching todays show on +1 so sorry if this alternate first numbers round solution has been posted as don't want to see any other spoilers.

25 x 9 = 225

25 + 10 - 7 = 228

228 x 2 = 456

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:36 pm
by Eoin Monaghan
ARMOIRES as a beater in the CARRIES round

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:56 pm
by Martin Long
2nd numbers round alternate:

25 + 7 - 3 = 29

8 + 4 = 12

29 x 12 = 348

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:27 pm
by James Robinson
1st Numbers Alt.: (7 x 7 x 10) - 25 - 9 = 456
2nd Numbers Alt.: (((25 x 3) - 7) x 5) + 8 = 348
3rd Numbers Alt.: (100 - 6) x (5 + 3) = 752

Well done again, Edward. ;) :) :D

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:28 pm
by Ryan Taylor
By the way I think I had OSTEOIDS in an early round which hasn't been mentioned.

Edit: No I didn't.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 7:45 pm
by Mike Brown
Marcus Hares wrote:Another top notch performance Ed - well played. That very tough conundrum appears to be invalid on Lexplorer so must be one of the new additions to the new dictionary.
Confirmed.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 3rd 2011

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:18 am
by Adam Gillard
Adam Gillard wrote:Edward is so cool!
Well said!