Spoilerim for Friday 17 July 2009
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:01 am
I'm positively tHulmescent with excitement.
A group for contestants and lovers of the Channel 4 game show 'Countdown'.
http://c4countdown.co.uk/
Charlie Reams wrote:I'm positively tHulmescent with excitement.
What is the best points margin on an Octochamp run?Kirk Bevins wrote:Argh! More niceish letters for Andrew means two more nines (I never had this many [gettable] nines and I'm sure Craig Beevers is jealous too) and another century despite being beaten on a round again. 118 means his 7 game total is now 802. I'm getting nervous. I was sat on 811 at this point and needed 114 for the record and just about got it. Andrew needs 124 in Monday's game for the octochamp record so will need even more luck with nice letters and gettable nines (not like SANTONICA).
I wish him all the best but not too much as I really want to keep my record for longer than 4 bloody months.
P.s A nice equaller that I had in round 13 was KAIROS.
It used to be on cdb but I can't find it any more. Either way, assuming Kirk didn't top it, I'm pretty sure it was Mr. Holden.Marc Meakin wrote:What is the best points margin on an Octochamp run?Kirk Bevins wrote:Argh! More niceish letters for Andrew means two more nines (I never had this many [gettable] nines and I'm sure Craig Beevers is jealous too) and another century despite being beaten on a round again. 118 means his 7 game total is now 802. I'm getting nervous. I was sat on 811 at this point and needed 114 for the record and just about got it. Andrew needs 124 in Monday's game for the octochamp record so will need even more luck with nice letters and gettable nines (not like SANTONICA).
I wish him all the best but not too much as I really want to keep my record for longer than 4 bloody months.
P.s A nice equaller that I had in round 13 was KAIROS.
Likewise. I thought it might apply to horses but I don't think I'd have risked it.Steve Durney wrote:I saw GALLOPER but didn't think it'd be in.
We get it. I think everyone here knows that if I were to break the record it would be down in no small part to luck without you highlighting it about 6 times in one paragraph.Kirk Bevins wrote:Argh! More niceish letters for Andrew means two more nines (I never had this many [gettable] nines and I'm sure Craig Beevers is jealous too) and another century despite being beaten on a round again. 118 means his 7 game total is now 802. I'm getting nervous. I was sat on 811 at this point and needed 114 for the record and just about got it. Andrew needs 124 in Monday's game for the octochamp record so will need even more luck with nice letters and gettable nines (not like SANTONICA).
I wish him all the best but not too much as I really want to keep my record for longer than 4 bloody months.
P.s A nice equaller that I had in round 13 was KAIROS.
I'm a bit lost here, Andrew. Could there be some element of luck involved in this televised parlour game? I await further clarification.Andrew Hulme wrote:We get it. I think everyone here knows that if I were to break the record it would be down in no small part to luck without you highlighting it about 6 times in one paragraph.Kirk Bevins wrote:Argh! More niceish letters for Andrew means two more nines (I never had this many [gettable] nines and I'm sure Craig Beevers is jealous too) and another century despite being beaten on a round again. 118 means his 7 game total is now 802. I'm getting nervous. I was sat on 811 at this point and needed 114 for the record and just about got it. Andrew needs 124 in Monday's game for the octochamp record so will need even more luck with nice letters and gettable nines (not like SANTONICA).
I wish him all the best but not too much as I really want to keep my record for longer than 4 bloody months.
P.s A nice equaller that I had in round 13 was KAIROS.
Wow. I didn't expect a snotty reply - my message wasn't supposed to convey that tone.Andrew Hulme wrote:
We get it. I think everyone here knows that if I were to break the record it would be down in no small part to luck without you highlighting it about 6 times in one paragraph.
Yes. I think it was James Robinson who quickly grabbed his glass of water after about 2 seconds on every numbers game and it was so frustrating to watch.Michael Wallace wrote:Another frustrating show to watch (although I totally appreciate that this will have been your fifth of the day). One thing that occurred to me was the whole "don't give away you have a 9" thing - I'd be pretty tempted not to bother with the acting if, like today, I was comfortably ahead near the end. Would that make me look like a twat?
If Andrew was to take your record, he might be keeping it for even less if Chris performs as expected.Kirk Bevins wrote: I wish him all the best but not too much as I really want to keep my record for longer than 4 bloody months.
It's perfectly possible to be aggravating without meaning to be.Kirk Bevins wrote:Wow. I didn't expect a snotty reply - my message wasn't supposed to convey that tone.Andrew Hulme wrote:
We get it. I think everyone here knows that if I were to break the record it would be down in no small part to luck without you highlighting it about 6 times in one paragraph.
You try not to get dehyrated while on a set that makes you feel like you're going to meltKirk Bevins wrote:Yes. I think it was James Robinson who quickly grabbed his glass of water after about 2 seconds on every numbers game and it was so frustrating to watch.