Page 1 of 1

Monday 11th May 2009 (Series 60, Prelim 67)

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 4:04 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Countdown recap for Monday 11 May 2009.

C1: Champion Paul 'Hairy' Casimir (2 wins, 167 points.)
C2: Damn, I've forgotten who it is. I know them. Oh yeh. Challenger Jimmy Gough. Yup. The apteroid. Who appears to have a lot in common with me.
DC: Susie Dent and Steve Davis.
RR: Rachel Riley.
OT: Other words or solutions.

R01: S M L P E I E Y M
R02: C A N O N I R E N
R03: R P R G A O A D I
R04: L A T O S U Z I E
R05: 25, 9, 10, 4, 1, 3. Target: 546.
TTT: EELCREAM - "He sounds like he's laughing, but he's actually got the hump."
R06: T I T E M A V O B
R07: N S H I A K T R E
R08: D E R A S I L E S
R09: N L T G U A E C P
R10: 75, 9, 10, 8, 7, 6. Target: 309.
TTT: ADDGREED - "Subjected to contempt, then demoted."
R11: R X P B O E I D N
R12: H I M E Q O S G A
R13: J C D T E O E T L
R14: 25, 2, 4, 9, 4, 7. Target: 414.
R15: F I N G E R P I X (conundrum)


And now a brief interlude before our main feature:

SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER

(Yup, you're gonna) Enjoy the show.

Round 1: S M L P E I E Y M

C1: SIMPLE (6)
C2: SIMPLY (6)
DC: SMILEY (6)
OT: IMPELS (6) SEEMLY (6) SLEEPY (6)
Score: 6–6 (max 6)

Round 2: C A N O N I R E N

C1: CANNIER (7)
C2: CANNIER (7)
Score: 13–13 (max 13)

Both contestants get the darren. I get excited, cos Jimmy's on a max game...

Round 3: R P R G A O A D I

C1: -
C2: PAGODA (6)
OT: AIRDROP (7) PARADOR (7) PODAGRA (7)
Score: 13–19 (max 20)

:|

Round 4: L A T O S U Z I E

C1: LAZIEST (7)
C2: OUTSAIL (7)
DC: ZEALOTS (7) OUTSIZE (7)
OT: ISOLATE (7) ZEALOUS (7) ZLOTIES (7)
Score: 20–26 (max 27)

Round 5: 25, 9, 10, 4, 1, 3. Target: 546.

C1: 546. 25x(10x3+1-9)-4 (10)
C2: 546. 25x(10+9+3)-4 (10)
Score: 30–36 (max 37)

Steve says how lucky he was to get the first ever televised 147 break, and win a mint Lada.

Teatime teaser: EELCREAM -> CAMELEER

Hmmm, I didn't get that clue. Anyone?

Round 6: T I T E M A V O B

C1: TOTEM (5)
C2: MOTIVATE (8)
OT: TAMBOTIE (8)
Score: 30–44 (max 45)

A great spot by Jimmy puts him into a slightly better lead, but Paul is doing well so far...

Round 7: N S H I A K T R E

C1: THINKERS (8)
C2: HAIRNETS (8)
OT: THERIANS (8) NARKIEST (8) RETHINKS (8)
Score: 38–52 (max 53)

And again, both contestants pull out a great word.

Round 8: D E R A S I L E S

C1: REALISED (8)
C2: REALISED (8)
DC: SIDEREAL (8)
OT: REALISES (8)
Score: 46–60 (max 61)

Yawn, and again...

Round 9: N L T G U A E C P

C1: TANGLE (6)
C2: TANGLE (6)
DC: LANGUE (6)
OT: PUNCTAE (7)
Score: 52–66 (max 68)

OoW: Susie talks about the linguistic origins of the snooker cue.

Round 10: 75, 9, 10, 8, 7, 6. Target: 309.

C1: 309. 75x(10-6)+9 (10)
C2: 309. 75x(8+6-10)+9 (10)
Score: 62–76 (max 78)

Another easy numbers game gives both players another 10 points.

Teatime teaser: ADDGREED -> DEGRADED

Round 11: R X P B O E I D N

C1: PONDER (6)
C2: POXIER (6)
DC: BOXIER (6) INBRED (6) PERIOD (6)
OT: BINDER (6) BRINED (6) REBIND (6) BONIER (6) BONXIE (6) BORIDE (6) DINERO (6) IRONED (6) DOPIER (6) OPINED (6) PONIED (6) ORPINE (6) PROBED (6)
Score: 68–82 (max 84)

A horribly flat round with 18 6s on offer.

Round 12: H I M E Q O S G A

C1: HOMIES (6)
C2: HOMIES (6)
OT: HOAGIES (7) HOMAGES (7)
Score: 74–88 (max 91)

Unfortunate for Jimmy that he doesn't go for HOMAGES, as he would be, um, on 89 if he had.

Round 13: J C D T E O E T L

C1: cottled
C2: CLOTTED (7)
Score: 74–95 (max 98)

A lovely bit of improvisation from Paul sadly doesn't pay off, as Jimmy pulls out of reach finally.

Round 14: 25, 2, 4, 9, 4, 7. Target: 414.

C1: 414. 25x4x4+7x2 (10)
C2: 414. 25x(9+7)+4x4-2 (10)
Score: 84–105 (max 108)

Round 15: F I N G E R P I X

C2 buzzes on 1 second to say PREFIXING which is correct.
Score: 84–115 (max 118)

Great performances from both players, but super-good from Jimmy - just 3 away from the max! Start worrying Kirk...

Recap brought to you by the Internet's first reverse paedophile, Kai Laddiman.

Further summaries are at:
http://www.apterous.org/cdb/series.php?series=60

Re: Monday 11th May 2009 (Series 60, Prelim 67)

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 4:50 pm
by Charlie Reams
Superb performance by Jimmy, under real pressure from a strong incumbent. Can't wait for tomorrow!

Re: Monday 11th May 2009 (Series 60, Prelim 67)

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 5:05 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Kai Laddiman wrote:TTT: EELCREAM - "He sounds like he's laughing, but he's actually got the hump."
[snip]
Teatime teaser: EELCREAM -> CAMELEER

Hmmm, I didn't get that clue. Anyone?
Srsly? CAMELEER sounds like CAVALIER, so he sounds like he's laughing. As in The Laughing Cavalier. And a CAMELEER rides a camel, and camels have humps. Actually.

Re: Monday 11th May 2009 (Series 60, Prelim 67)

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 9:28 pm
by David Williams
"Homages? It's definitely a count noun, I don't know if there's a countable sense. Yes, there is." S Dent.

How could there not be a countable sense of a count noun? What if there wasn't? Is there some rule change I don't know about?

Re: Monday 11th May 2009 (Series 60, Prelim 67)

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 10:26 pm
by Kirk Bevins
David Williams wrote:"Homages? It's definitely a count noun, I don't know if there's a countable sense. Yes, there is." S Dent.

How could there not be a countable sense of a count noun? What if there wasn't? Is there some rule change I don't know about?
She must have meant mass noun. She made a mistake which is fair enough.

Re: Monday 11th May 2009 (Series 60, Prelim 67)

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 10:31 pm
by Phil Reynolds
David Williams wrote:"Homages? It's definitely a count noun, I don't know if there's a countable sense. Yes, there is." S Dent.
What she actually said was "If you pay homage it's definitely a count noun" - in that context she clearly meant mass noun and simply made a verbal slip.

Re: Monday 11th May 2009 (Series 60, Prelim 67)

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 10:38 pm
by David Williams
Yes, I think you must be right. I must admit I thought the original meaning was some sort of medieval religious count noun sort of thing, so I had no doubt that HOMAGES was OK, but that's not quite how the dictionary has it.

Re: Monday 11th May 2009 (Series 60, Prelim 67)

Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 12:49 pm
by David O'Donnell
Excellent debut, well done!