Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:46 pm
by Toby McDonald
PISTOLEER in R12

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)

Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2025 6:53 am
by Howie Myers
r14 alt: 8*7*10-5-3=552

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)

Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2025 8:28 am
by Philip A
REMUAGE in Round 2. Apparently, the hyphen was added to ‘pre-game’ and ‘post-game’ in the dictionary after recording, so ‘pregame’ wouldn’t count now.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)

Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:36 am
by Gavin Chipper
So you could have had it pregame but not post-game.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)

Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2025 10:53 am
by Philip A
Gavin Chipper wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:36 am So you could have had it pregame but not post-game.
Ah very good!

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2025 8:48 pm
by Stewart Gordon
Were DC not ELOCUTING about round 7 because they weren't given the chance?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2025 9:25 pm
by Thomas Cappleman
Stewart Gordon wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2025 8:48 pm Were DC not ELOCUTING about round 7 because they weren't given the chance?
No, but because it's not in the dictionary

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2025 12:15 am
by Stewart Gordon
Thomas Cappleman wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2025 9:25 pm
Stewart Gordon wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2025 8:48 pmWere DC not ELOCUTING about round 7 because they weren't given the chance?
No, but because it's not in the dictionary
I'm not at all convinced that's the reason. A word not being in a particular dictionary may be a barrier to giving the word as one that was available, but frequently it isn't a barrier to doing the thing denoted by the word. As you may have noticed, DC were just not consulted at all for that round, hence my point.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2025 4:09 pm
by Philip A
Stewart Gordon wrote: Wed Apr 09, 2025 12:15 am
Thomas Cappleman wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2025 9:25 pm
Stewart Gordon wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2025 8:48 pmWere DC not ELOCUTING about round 7 because they weren't given the chance?
No, but because it's not in the dictionary
I'm not at all convinced that's the reason. A word not being in a particular dictionary may be a barrier to giving the word as one that was available, but frequently it isn't a barrier to doing the thing denoted by the word. As you may have noticed, DC were just not consulted at all for that round, hence my point.
Well they can’t check or say absolutely everything. There’s just not enough time. They can only act on the spot.