Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)
Moderator: James Robinson
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1226
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:23 pm
Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)
PISTOLEER in R12
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2019 6:05 am
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)
r14 alt: 8*7*10-5-3=552
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)
REMUAGE in Round 2. Apparently, the hyphen was added to ‘pre-game’ and ‘post-game’ in the dictionary after recording, so ‘pregame’ wouldn’t count now.
Series 78 Runner-up
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 14274
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)
So you could have had it pregame but not post-game.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:48 am
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)
Were DC not ELOCUTING about round 7 because they weren't given the chance?
-
- Series 72 Champion
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:42 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)
No, but because it's not in the dictionaryStewart Gordon wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 8:48 pm Were DC not ELOCUTING about round 7 because they weren't given the chance?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:48 am
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)
I'm not at all convinced that's the reason. A word not being in a particular dictionary may be a barrier to giving the word as one that was available, but frequently it isn't a barrier to doing the thing denoted by the word. As you may have noticed, DC were just not consulted at all for that round, hence my point.Thomas Cappleman wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 9:25 pmNo, but because it's not in the dictionaryStewart Gordon wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 8:48 pmWere DC not ELOCUTING about round 7 because they weren't given the chance?
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th February 2025 (Series 91, Heat 27)
Well they can’t check or say absolutely everything. There’s just not enough time. They can only act on the spot.Stewart Gordon wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 12:15 amI'm not at all convinced that's the reason. A word not being in a particular dictionary may be a barrier to giving the word as one that was available, but frequently it isn't a barrier to doing the thing denoted by the word. As you may have noticed, DC were just not consulted at all for that round, hence my point.Thomas Cappleman wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 9:25 pmNo, but because it's not in the dictionaryStewart Gordon wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 8:48 pmWere DC not ELOCUTING about round 7 because they weren't given the chance?
Series 78 Runner-up