Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Moderator: James Robinson
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:43 pm
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
- Contact:
Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Post them here. There are likely to be many beaters!
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Not impressed with Rick's spot today
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
No beaters for me yet, but I (and anyone else watching last night's COOT games) must surely have been willing the last vowel of Round 3 to be an E.
Also it'll be pretty dismal if Carol can't work out that numbers trick. If you know your birth year and the current year then yep, you really can work out your age! Who knew?
Also it'll be pretty dismal if Carol can't work out that numbers trick. If you know your birth year and the current year then yep, you really can work out your age! Who knew?
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:43 pm
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
It worked for me today . The number I was thinking of was 8 and I ended up with 816 with the last two numbers being my actual age of 16 . I was well impressed
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:43 pm
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
I willed on an E Charlie . I think it was for AUMBRIES!Charlie Reams wrote:No beaters for me yet, but I (and anyone else watching last night's COOT games) must surely have been willing the last vowel of Round 3 to be an E.
Also it'll be pretty dismal if Carol can't work out that numbers trick. If you know your birth year and the current year then yep, you really can work out your age! Who knew?
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Now now, you also need to know whether you've had your birthday this year yet or notCharlie Reams wrote:Also it'll be pretty dismal if Carol can't work out that numbers trick. If you know your birth year and the current year then yep, you really can work out your age! Who knew?
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:43 pm
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
I thought CLANGIEST but apparently not
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Was half expecting him to take a bit longer on that last C/V selection in the STEALING round, given he knew what vowel he'd get
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
I had CLEATING, but cleat's not a verbjasoncullen wrote:I thought CLANGIEST but apparently not
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 5:47 am
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
same here jay, i thought CLANGIEST, bev is lucky shes not playin someone like DOD cuz she would end up on 0 points, i aint kidding, i do like her tho, but i cannot believe how she passed the audition, i dont think she has declared anything in 5 numbers games, which may well be a first
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:43 pm
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
And it is not like she is getting difficult numbers games! But I do agree that she seems like a nice lady. You've gotta give her thatMatt Coates wrote:same here jay, i thought CLANGIEST, bev is lucky shes not playin someone like DOD cuz she would end up on 0 points, i aint kidding, i do like her tho, but i cannot believe how she passed the audition, i dont think she has declared anything in 5 numbers games, which may well be a first
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Aw, no BACKIES? (as in, naughty bicycle use, rather than baccy)
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 5:47 am
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
shes like that nervous woman on catherine tate, when shes asked to pick her letters/numbers. she is likeable but one of the worst players ive seen, the new chap doesnt seem all that good either, ah well, at least there are some good 'uns in the pipeline
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:43 pm
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
ARTERIAL as a beater
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Damn, beat me to it.jasoncullen wrote:ARTERIAL as a beater
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:43 pm
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
6+5 + (10/5) = 13*75 = 975 + 1= 976
- Joseph Bolas
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
3rd Numbers: ((6 + 5 + (10 / 5)) x 75) + 1
EDIT: Damn beaten by Jason
EDIT: Damn beaten by Jason
Last edited by Joseph Bolas on Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 5:47 am
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
(6+5=(10/5))X75=975+1
- Ray Folwell
- Acolyte
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:46 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
(6+5+10/5) x 75 + 1 - you beat me to it
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:43 pm
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Is 30 points the lowest champion score in the 15 round era of all time? It must be...surely?
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Damn you're all too quick. I was gonna post ARTERIAL and the CV beater in round 14. I also can not believe Carol didn't understand the algebra trick for the year etc. I used that exact trick on my year 8s the other month (except the starting number was how many days a week do you eat chocolate, between 1 and 7 -- anything will work as long as it's less than 10 and my example will force it to be less than 10).
As for DoD beating her to 0, I did quite well, beating her 115-13, but doing that in the studio is different as we all know I'm a bottler.
P.s HEREIN was a nice 6 in round 1.
As for DoD beating her to 0, I did quite well, beating her 115-13, but doing that in the studio is different as we all know I'm a bottler.
P.s HEREIN was a nice 6 in round 1.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Harlow
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
I did (9+5+5-6)x75+1=976
Also the initial number needn't be less than 10, as you just get a 4-digit answer, and you just take the first two. (You do need to be aged less than 100, though. )
Also the initial number needn't be less than 10, as you just get a 4-digit answer, and you just take the first two. (You do need to be aged less than 100, though. )
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Almost certainly. And I guess 88 is the lowest total for anyone over two games. Still, she gets one day as #8 seed before she gets passed by Chris Davies tomorrow.jasoncullen wrote:Is 30 points the lowest champion score in the 15 round era of all time? It must be...surely?
- Joseph Bolas
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
I was meant to catch this algebra trick on Channel 4+1 after missing it first time around but I forgot to watch it.Kirk Bevins wrote:Damn you're all too quick. I was gonna post ARTERIAL and the CV beater in round 14. I also can not believe Carol didn't understand the algebra trick for the year etc. I used that exact trick on my year 8s the other month (except the starting number was how many days a week do you eat chocolate, between 1 and 7 -- anything will work as long as it's less than 10 and my example will force it to be less than 10).
What is the trick you use Kirk and does anyone remember what the conundrum was, as I missed that as well
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
There's at least one less. In her opening game, Heather Culpin managed to keep her opponent down to 29. See here.jasoncullen wrote:Is 30 points the lowest champion score in the 15 round era of all time? It must be...surely?
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Carol did seem to go round the houses a bit in explaining Rick's "trick". Was it really necessary for her to explain that 1758 is 2008 - 250, and so when you add 1758 to 250 what you're doing is 250 + 2008 - 250, so the 250s cancel, leaving 2008? Surely simply adding 250 and 1758 to give 2008 would have been a simpler approach. But maybe there were a few minutes spare and she was asked to pad it out a bit.
As for the conundrum, Joseph, it was THYGLOOMY.
As for the conundrum, Joseph, it was THYGLOOMY.
- Richard Priest
- Devotee
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:30 pm
- Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Yeah, I thought that about the audition too Matt, nice lady but I'm amazed she passed.Matt Coates wrote:same here jay, i thought CLANGIEST, bev is lucky shes not playin someone like DOD cuz she would end up on 0 points, i aint kidding, i do like her tho, but i cannot believe how she passed the audition, i dont think she has declared anything in 5 numbers games, which may well be a first
I also noticed, I think in the round where she declared LANCING but was beaten by the 8, Susie never mentioned that she'd used the N twice which she normally would do.
- Joseph Bolas
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
Thank you Howard . It seems I didn't miss much .Howard Somerset wrote:As for the conundrum, Joseph, it was THYGLOOMY.
After having words this week like RECTUMS, SCROTUM and GENITALS I am hoping that one day, the word SPHINCTER will be used for a conundrum
-
- Series 48 Champion
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:08 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th July 2008
I was extremely dozy when watching Thursday's show - first I went for YARNERS in round 7, which is patently bollocks, then in round 9 I got TAXONOMY, and didn't realize till I loaded up CountMax after the show, that there was no Y Damian's going to crush me in the COOT final...
But yes I think declaring nothing on 6 consecutive numbers rounds must be an all-time record...
But yes I think declaring nothing on 6 consecutive numbers rounds must be an all-time record...