), but will the King's Cross signalman stay on the right track or go off the rails today 
/ 
- Take your pick.I'll be back later with the recap.
Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Moderator: James Robinson
-
James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10683
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Right, so the new champion has been crowned, and his name is James (not a bad name ), but will the King's Cross signalman stay on the right track or go off the rails today / - Take your pick.
I'll be back later with the recap.
), but will the King's Cross signalman stay on the right track or go off the rails today / - Take your pick.I'll be back later with the recap.
-
Marc Meakin
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7052
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
BALLSIER for a contestant beater in round 2.
PROTEINS round 4.
PROTEINS round 4.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
-
Marc Meakin
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7052
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
first numbers (100 x 4) - 75 - 3 x (50/25) = 644 (took 2 minutes though)
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
-
Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
2nd numbers - (100-9)*8 - 25 + 3*4 works, right?
-
Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
(25x8+9-4)x3+100 for round 10.
I was quite impressed with this.
I was quite impressed with this.
-
Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Wow, a level 9 conundrum today. Hardcore.
-
Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Yeah, I got it on about 35 seconds. Surprisingly difficult I thought. I think many people offer UNDERTEST but since this was the scramble, I was stumped.Michael Wallace wrote:Wow, a level 9 conundrum today. Hardcore.
-
Josh Hurst
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:59 pm
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Initially Dom declared WANKER in round 11, so it had to be shot again. LOL!
-
Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Ha, I did wonder about that. Good stuffJosh Hurst wrote:Initially Dom declared WANKER in round 11, so it had to be shot again. LOL!
-
Gavin Chipper
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 14276
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
I hope so cos that's what I did.Michael Wallace wrote:2nd numbers - (100-9)*8 - 25 + 3*4 works, right?
-
James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10683
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Yeah, I was so happy with myself with getting RESTUNTED after 5 secs. What a fool I amKirk Bevins wrote:Yeah, I got it on about 35 seconds. Surprisingly difficult I thought. I think many people offer UNDERTEST but since this was the scramble, I was stumped.Michael Wallace wrote:Wow, a level 9 conundrum today. Hardcore.
Having said that I was also proud of myself with GENIPAP too. What a shocker
-
Jim Treloar
- Rookie
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 7:58 pm
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Round 11, yes Josh, I was also there. I recall the take took quite a time, Jeff also got involved making some comment about it jumping out, then made some remark about, sorry, very unprofessional. Just as well it was easy to change one letter without making any difference to the score.
Kirk - it was me who had a quick word with you yesterday at the studio (in the loo, but no one read anything into that!), didn't actually introduce myself as the name wouldn't have meant anything to you, but nice to meet you.
Jim Treloar
Kirk - it was me who had a quick word with you yesterday at the studio (in the loo, but no one read anything into that!), didn't actually introduce myself as the name wouldn't have meant anything to you, but nice to meet you.
Jim Treloar
-
Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Ah nice to meet you. I did recognise the name, yes, so you should have said!Jim Treloar wrote: Kirk - it was me who had a quick word with you yesterday at the studio (in the loo, but no one read anything into that!), didn't actually introduce myself as the name wouldn't have meant anything to you, but nice to meet you.
Jim Treloar