Spoilers For Wednesday May 12th 2010

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Spoilers For Wednesday May 12th 2010

Post by James Robinson »

So, the champions' chair merry-go-round is in full swing, as we now have a 3rd different occupant in it today, with Paul Stevenson (and his fan club in the audience) in the chair, after beating Gwen Robinson yesterday.

He looks like a decent contestant, 10 maxes yesterday proves otherwise.

Can he win no.2 today :?:

Find out with me later. ;) :) :D
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday May 12th 2010

Post by Matt Morrison »

James Robinson wrote:He looks like a decent contestant, 10 maxes yesterday proves otherwise.
Harsh! I'm always pretty chuffed when I get 10 maxes. Must be nice being fucking amazing.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday May 12th 2010

Post by Michael Wallace »

Matt Morrison wrote:
James Robinson wrote:He looks like a decent contestant, 10 maxes yesterday proves otherwise.
Harsh! I'm always pretty chuffed when I get 10 maxes. Must be nice being fucking amazing.
I'm guessing that's a typo/joke given James doesn't even average 9 per game (and a cursory glance of the top n players on apterous shows that not many average more than 10).
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday May 12th 2010

Post by James Robinson »

Michael Wallace wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:
James Robinson wrote:He looks like a decent contestant, 10 maxes yesterday proves otherwise.
Harsh! I'm always pretty chuffed when I get 10 maxes. Must be nice being fucking amazing.
I'm guessing that's a typo/joke given James doesn't even average 9 per game (and a cursory glance of the top n players on apterous shows that not many average more than 10).
Correct, Michael. It was a slight gaffe, but I'm used to that by now. :lol:

Not sure why I added the "otherwise" bit at the end there. Should've been "it".

I was going to add to Matt's comment, "Wish I knew :!: " :roll:
User avatar
Brian Moore
Devotee
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
Location: Exeter

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday May 12th 2010

Post by Brian Moore »

Really good contest today. My brain must have been going slow as I struggled even more than usual to come up with anything useful. I looked up only one on Lexplorer, which told me that ^HARDONS aren't allowed in Countdown.
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday May 12th 2010

Post by James Robinson »

Interesting that bit at the end about the Teletubbies, when Rachel said her favourite was "the one with the bag", and Jeff disagreed, saying "Tinky-Winky", but unless I'm not mistaken, Tinky-Winky WAS "the one with the bag". :?

Oh well.

A very good game again. Almost thought Paul had lost it, when he declared too far away in the last numbers. :shock: :o

HIJRAS as a contestant beater in round 1, GUIMPES as a DC leveller in round 4 and ERRATIC as a DC leveller in round 11.

1st Numbers Alt.: (100 + 9 + 2) x (6 - 1) = 555

2nd Numbers Alt.: (50 x 4) - (75 / 3) - 4 = 171
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday May 12th 2010

Post by Kirk Bevins »

James Robinson wrote:Interesting that bit at the end about the Teletubbies, when Rachel said her favourite was "the one with the bag", and Jeff disagreed, saying "Tinky-Winky", but unless I'm not mistaken, Tinky-Winky WAS "the one with the bag". :?

Oh well.
But then his joke wouldn't work would it?
Post Reply