A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:27 pm
A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I,m surprised that there has been no mention anywhere yet that there is only about 40ish programmes left to go til the 5000th show
has anything special been planned?
if not i would suggest that channel 4 do a special countdown themed night including a special documentary and so=me of those classic show that were talked about on a seperate thred
has anything special been planned?
if not i would suggest that channel 4 do a special countdown themed night including a special documentary and so=me of those classic show that were talked about on a seperate thred
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
That would be nice, Danni, but it seems unlikely that anything is going to happen at this late stage.
Oh, by the way, I've enjoyed those classic episodes that have just been put on countdowngoofs' YouTube channel recently.
Oh, by the way, I've enjoyed those classic episodes that have just been put on countdowngoofs' YouTube channel recently.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6408
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Maybe these specials that Damo has planned will coincide with this monumental event.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Let's hope so, there's less than 9 weeks to go till the BIG 5-000Marc Meakin wrote:Maybe these specials that Damo has planned will coincide with this monumental event.
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Yes.DANNI WOODHOUSE wrote:has anything special been planned?
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
HurrayD Eadie wrote:Yes.DANNI WOODHOUSE wrote:has anything special been planned?
What exactly, or do you have to keep it under wraps for a bit
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
My money is on a comeback kids special between you and Kirk. Or possibly Amey Deshpande.James Robinson wrote:What exactly, or do you have to keep it under wraps for a bit
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
No, but i'm going to.James Robinson wrote: do you have to keep it under wraps for a bit
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Is that purely because you want to see me get annihilated on national TVMichael Wallace wrote:My money is on a comeback kids special between you and Kirk.James Robinson wrote:What exactly, or do you have to keep it under wraps for a bit
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6408
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I would like to see a live, transmitted, episode of Countdown.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
That's almost going to be hard with all the turntable rotating and possiblilty of bad language being broadcast during daytime hours, but it certainly would be adventurous.Marc Meakin wrote:I would like to see a live, transmitted, episode of Countdown.
- Thomas Wood
- Rookie
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Perhaps it could be transmitted as a post watershed specialJames Robinson wrote:That's almost going to be hard with all the turntable rotating and possiblilty of bad language being broadcast during daytime hours, but it certainly would be adventurous.Marc Meakin wrote:I would like to see a live, transmitted, episode of Countdown.
Thomas Wood
http://www.youtube.com/countdowngoofs
http://www.youtube.com/countdowngoofs
- Lesley Hines
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:29 pm
- Location: Worcester
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I think that might be a bit of a format change...James Robinson wrote:Is that purely because you want to see me get annihilated on national TVMichael Wallace wrote:My money is on a comeback kids special between you and Kirk.James Robinson wrote:What exactly, or do you have to keep it under wraps for a bit
Lowering the averages since 2009
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I don't read every word here, but if I've got this right, Chris and Kirk are to play in a special in a few weeks. And, as I understand it, neither of them is in full employment right now, so could doubtless do with a bit of cash. Personally I would value their contribution to this special a lot more highly than the contribution of, say, the celebrity guest. So I hope they aren't being fobbed off with a second-class train fare and a cheque for fifty quid. Ask for a couple of grand if you haven't recorded yet. It's small change to ITV, and it's not as if they have much alternative.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
On the down side everyone will think you're total dicks. Probably worth it for a few quid though, I mean you are unemployed after all.David Williams wrote:I don't read every word here, but if I've got this right, Chris and Kirk are to play in a special in a few weeks. And, as I understand it, neither of them is in full employment right now, so could doubtless do with a bit of cash. Personally I would value their contribution to this special a lot more highly than the contribution of, say, the celebrity guest. So I hope they aren't being fobbed off with a second-class train fare and a cheque for fifty quid. Ask for a couple of grand if you haven't recorded yet. It's small change to ITV, and it's not as if they have much alternative.
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
David Williams wrote:I don't read every word here, but if I've got this right, Chris and Kirk are to play in a special in a few weeks. And, as I understand it, neither of them is in full employment right now, so could doubtless do with a bit of cash. Personally I would value their contribution to this special a lot more highly than the contribution of, say, the celebrity guest. So I hope they aren't being fobbed off with a second-class train fare and a cheque for fifty quid. Ask for a couple of grand if you haven't recorded yet. It's small change to ITV, and it's not as if they have much alternative.
Since when did any other contestants on any other show get paid? We're recording 4 specials and none of the participants have been press-ganged into taking part, they've been asked and have accepted. Anyone can ask for a couple of grand, sure, but the answer would be no, and the alternative is to use other players instead. If you'd like to volunteer yourself to be their agent, am sure we can work something out.
Last edited by D Eadie on Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Ooh, now I'm getting even more excited, Damian. I so hope that these 4 specials are going to be blockbuster names in blockbuster battles, not involving Blockbusters.D Eadie wrote:We're recording 4 specials and none of the participants have been press-ganged into taking part, they've been asked and have accepted.
If my maths is correct, then Episode 5000 is due to be broadcast on March 16th. Since that's a Tuesday, are you going to show the first of these on that Tuesday, with the others making up the rest of the week, or are you still refusing to be drawn on such details
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
James Robinson wrote:Ooh, now I'm getting even more excited, Damian. I so hope that these 4 specials are going to be blockbuster names in blockbuster battles, not involving Blockbusters.D Eadie wrote:We're recording 4 specials and none of the participants have been press-ganged into taking part, they've been asked and have accepted.
If my maths is correct, then Episode 5000 is due to be broadcast on March 16th. Since that's a Tuesday, are you going to show the first of these on that Tuesday, with the others making up the rest of the week, or are you still refusing to be drawn on such details
The specials have nothing to do with the 5000th show, and your maths isn't correct (not for the first time )
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Are you sure, Damian?D Eadie wrote:The specials have nothing to do with the 5000th show, and your maths isn't correct (not for the first time )James Robinson wrote:Ooh, now I'm getting even more excited, Damian. I so hope that these 4 specials are going to be blockbuster names in blockbuster battles, not involving Blockbusters.D Eadie wrote:We're recording 4 specials and none of the participants have been press-ganged into taking part, they've been asked and have accepted.
If my maths is correct, then Episode 5000 is due to be broadcast on March 16th. Since that's a Tuesday, are you going to show the first of these on that Tuesday, with the others making up the rest of the week, or are you still refusing to be drawn on such details
Obviously, I'm counting just the regular shows, but the Wiki page give today's episode as #4961.
So, obviously that means there are another 39 till #5000.
So, the end of the week is #4963.
The week ending 29/1/10 has shows #4964 to #4968.
The week ending 5/2/10 has shows #4969 to #4973.
The week ending 12/2/10 has shows #4974 to #4978.
The week ending 19/2/10 has shows #4979 to #4983.
The week ending 26/2/10 has shows #4984 to #4988.
The week ending 5/3/10 has shows #4989 to #4993.
The week ending 12/3/10 has shows #4994 to #4998.
The week ending 19/3/10 has shows #4999 to #5003.
Which would make 16/3/10 the 5000th, unless there's some horse racing that'd you'd like to butt in somewhere, of course.
P.S. Thanks for mentioning that unfortunate episode in my life again.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Wiki numbering isn't necessarily correct; may be one or two out. This has been mentioned before, either here or on wiki (can't remember just where).
Also, Cheltenham Festival, for which Coundown normally has a break, is 16-19 March this year.
Also, Cheltenham Festival, for which Coundown normally has a break, is 16-19 March this year.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Damn the horse racing, how many people actually watch the horse racing on the tellyHoward Somerset wrote:Also, Cheltenham Festival, for which Coundown normally has a break, is 16-19 March this year.
- James Doohan
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 4:20 pm
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
The Cheltenham Festival gets millions of viewers, probably even more than Countdown getsJames Robinson wrote:Damn the horse racing, how many people actually watch the horse racing on the tellyHoward Somerset wrote:Also, Cheltenham Festival, for which Coundown normally has a break, is 16-19 March this year.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I shouldn't really be that surprised about the viewership, although for most of the time when horse racing's on, they just talk about odds/betting/form, etc. Hardly any of the time is spent watching any live horserace action.james doohan wrote:The Cheltenham Festival gets millions of viewers, probably even more than Countdown getsJames Robinson wrote:Damn the horse racing, how many people actually watch the horse racing on the tellyHoward Somerset wrote:Also, Cheltenham Festival, for which Coundown normally has a break, is 16-19 March this year.
Some might say the same for football, but at least the percentage of live action to stats, etc. on football is at least 50% live action, whereas a horserace is lucky to last 5-10 minutes normally.
- Craig Beevers
- Series 57 Champion
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I'd love if just for the sake of justice the horse racing was taken off for worthwhile television. All the times I'd be watching the Ashes or something similar... crucial session and now we're off the mickey mouse five shilling handicap.
Maybe one special is going to be a live episode on the racecourse at Cheltenham. I'm sure Damian can fend off the shorthouse nonsportsmen single handed, the toffs won't put up a fight and will be too busy looking at each other's hats anyway.
Maybe one special is going to be a live episode on the racecourse at Cheltenham. I'm sure Damian can fend off the shorthouse nonsportsmen single handed, the toffs won't put up a fight and will be too busy looking at each other's hats anyway.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
There is a remote possibility that cricket is no more or less worthwhile than horse racing, and it just happens that you like one of them and not the other.Craig Beevers wrote:I'd love if just for the sake of justice the horse racing was taken off for worthwhile television. All the times I'd be watching the Ashes or something similar... crucial session and now we're off the mickey mouse five shilling handicap.
- Craig Beevers
- Series 57 Champion
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
There's not even as much as what Kirk would call 0% possibility. The Ashes is of national interest and is a proper sport. Horse racing is just naff gambling and a charity fund for the vertically challenged. Therefore The Ashes has infinitely more value per viewer than the horse racing. Same as Countdown has much more value per viewer than Deal or no Deal.Charlie Reams wrote:There is a remote possibility that cricket is no more or less worthwhile than horse racing, and it just happens that you like one of them and not the other.Craig Beevers wrote:I'd love if just for the sake of justice the horse racing was taken off for worthwhile television. All the times I'd be watching the Ashes or something similar... crucial session and now we're off the mickey mouse five shilling handicap.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
An arbitrary opinion expressed with the same charming humility as always.Craig Beevers wrote: There's not even as much as what Kirk would call 0% possibility. The Ashes is of national interest and is a proper sport. Horse racing is just naff gambling and a charity fund for the vertically challenged. Therefore The Ashes has infinitely more value per viewer than the horse racing. Same as Countdown has much more value per viewer than Deal or no Deal.
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I like horse racing. I think it's interesting, like when a jockey rides an odds on favourite awfully, throwing away an easy win. Of course Countdown is much better, but horse racing still makes for good telly.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13380
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Am I the only one that enjoys Craig's posts? (Doesn't mean I agree with them - I might join in actually)Charlie Reams wrote:An arbitrary opinion expressed with the same charming humility as always.Craig Beevers wrote: There's not even as much as what Kirk would call 0% possibility. The Ashes is of national interest and is a proper sport. Horse racing is just naff gambling and a charity fund for the vertically challenged. Therefore The Ashes has infinitely more value per viewer than the horse racing. Same as Countdown has much more value per viewer than Deal or no Deal.
The Ashes isn't really proper sport, but more of an ongoing grudge match, like the Boat Race. I don't follow cricket, but there's like a world cup and stuff isn't there? That's far more proper surely. Some exclusive competition between the same two participants is for fun only. Proper sport is open.Craig Beevers wrote:There's not even as much as what Kirk would call 0% possibility. The Ashes is of national interest and is a proper sport. Horse racing is just naff gambling and a charity fund for the vertically challenged. Therefore The Ashes has infinitely more value per viewer than the horse racing. Same as Countdown has much more value per viewer than Deal or no Deal.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6408
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
DOND is better than Horse racing.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- Alec Rivers
- Devotee
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
- Contact:
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
A testcard is better than horse racing. What trifling velleity I may once have possessed for spectating said sport was irrevocably expunged the moment I was unfortunate enough to witness the cringeworthy witterings and mannerisms of that abomination commonly referred to as John McCririck. A more irritating specimen of humanity I have yet to encounter.Marc Meakin wrote:DOND is better than Horse racing.
- Brian Moore
- Devotee
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
- Location: Exeter
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I think that this is a dodgy argument to use, given that a game of Countdown only lasts 7 minutes and 30 seconds of actual play time, out of a 37-minute programme.James Robinson wrote:I shouldn't really be that surprised about the viewership, although for most of the time when horse racing's on, they just talk about odds/betting/form, etc. Hardly any of the time is spent watching any live horserace action.
Some might say the same for football, but at least the percentage of live action to stats, etc. on football is at least 50% live action, whereas a horserace is lucky to last 5-10 minutes normally.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
You say that, but if you take away the intros, the DC segment, Origin Of Words and the end bits, that still just under 30 minutes roughly which is actual gameplay, rather than just the rubbish 5 or so minutes of watching some horses go round a track.Brian Moore wrote:I think that this is a dodgy argument to use, given that a game of Countdown only lasts 7 minutes and 30 seconds of actual play time, out of a 37-minute programme.James Robinson wrote:I shouldn't really be that surprised about the viewership, although for most of the time when horse racing's on, they just talk about odds/betting/form, etc. Hardly any of the time is spent watching any live horserace action.
Some might say the same for football, but at least the percentage of live action to stats, etc. on football is at least 50% live action, whereas a horserace is lucky to last 5-10 minutes normally.
- JimBentley
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2820
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
- Contact:
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
James Robinson wrote:...at least the percentage of live action to stats, etc. on football is at least 50% live action, whereas a horserace is lucky to last 5-10 minutes normally.
This is probably the shittest argument I've ever seen on here, and there's been some pretty good competition. The Olympic men's 100m final lasts under ten seconds, does that make it thirty times worse than yer average National Hunt race? One of the great things about sport is the stuff that goes on outside the actual action, and horse racing has a lot of it. Fair enough if you're not into it, but don't try to rationalise it like that, it just looks silly.James Robinson wrote:...just the rubbish 5 or so minutes of watching some horses go round a track.
-
- Series 58 Champion
- Posts: 2010
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: Cardiff
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I have to type that I actually like the horses or anything I can gamble on. I really enjoy watching Countdown but it's never had me jumping up and down on my sofa whipping myself on the ass with my belt ... well it did once but that was an exception.
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
It was edited out of the final broadcast, anyway.David O'Donnell wrote:I really enjoy watching Countdown but it's never had me jumping up and down on my sofa whipping myself on the ass with my belt ... well it did once but that was an exception.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
If you appear as an unknown on Big Brother I don't suppose you get paid. You do it because you want to win, or just to appear on TV. But if the producers decide you're so good that your presence on another show will make people tune in just to see you, then you're on Celebrity Big Brother, and you do get paid. (Or they give you a job and you end up running the whole shebang.)D Eadie wrote:David Williams wrote:I don't read every word here, but if I've got this right, Chris and Kirk are to play in a special in a few weeks. And, as I understand it, neither of them is in full employment right now, so could doubtless do with a bit of cash. Personally I would value their contribution to this special a lot more highly than the contribution of, say, the celebrity guest. So I hope they aren't being fobbed off with a second-class train fare and a cheque for fifty quid. Ask for a couple of grand if you haven't recorded yet. It's small change to ITV, and it's not as if they have much alternative.
Since when did any other contestants on any other show get paid? We're recording 4 specials and none of the participants have been press-ganged into taking part, they've been asked and have accepted. Anyone can ask for a couple of grand, sure, but the answer would be no, and the alternative is to use other players instead. If you'd like to volunteer yourself to be their agent, am sure we can work something out.
If a show is 'special' because you're on it, you deserve to be rewarded. Not going to happen though, while people are prepared to boost C4 viewing figures for nothing.
-
- Series 58 Champion
- Posts: 2010
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: Cardiff
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Aren't you assuming that the special will boost figures? I don't think that's a given, aside from the obvious interest on this forum I am not sure if the presence of two uber nerds will do much to titillate the viewing public. I don't mean this as a dig but people generally enjoy playing along with the contestants and this may not be an option if the players are guaranteed to kick your ass.David Williams wrote:If you appear as an unknown on Big Brother I don't suppose you get paid. You do it because you want to win, or just to appear on TV. But if the producers decide you're so good that your presence on another show will make people tune in just to see you, then you're on Celebrity Big Brother, and you do get paid. (Or they give you a job and you end up running the whole shebang.)D Eadie wrote:David Williams wrote:I don't read every word here, but if I've got this right, Chris and Kirk are to play in a special in a few weeks. And, as I understand it, neither of them is in full employment right now, so could doubtless do with a bit of cash. Personally I would value their contribution to this special a lot more highly than the contribution of, say, the celebrity guest. So I hope they aren't being fobbed off with a second-class train fare and a cheque for fifty quid. Ask for a couple of grand if you haven't recorded yet. It's small change to ITV, and it's not as if they have much alternative.
Since when did any other contestants on any other show get paid? We're recording 4 specials and none of the participants have been press-ganged into taking part, they've been asked and have accepted. Anyone can ask for a couple of grand, sure, but the answer would be no, and the alternative is to use other players instead. If you'd like to volunteer yourself to be their agent, am sure we can work something out.
If a show is 'special' because you're on it, you deserve to be rewarded. Not going to happen though, while people are prepared to boost C4 viewing figures for nothing.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
David O'Donnell and David Williams, the two most negative particles in the universe, lock horns. But will they attract or repel? Stay tuned!
-
- Series 58 Champion
- Posts: 2010
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: Cardiff
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Whatever the outcome I shall be disappointed.Charlie Reams wrote:David O'Donnell and David Williams, the two most negative particles in the universe, lock horns. But will they attract or repel? Stay tuned!
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Just shows. I didn't even think we were being negative or locking horns. But Gavin will be upset not to figure in this negativity hall of fame.Charlie Reams wrote:David O'Donnell and David Williams, the two most negative particles in the universe, lock horns. But will they attract or repel? Stay tuned!
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Was only kidding mate, I think you talk sense a lot of the time but on this occasion I disagree. Being on Countdown is a great privilege and if someone else sells a bit more advertising on the back of that, so much the better. Life needn't be a zero-sum game.David Williams wrote:Just shows. I didn't even think we were being negative or locking horns. But Gavin will be upset not to figure in this negativity hall of fame.Charlie Reams wrote:David O'Donnell and David Williams, the two most negative particles in the universe, lock horns. But will they attract or repel? Stay tuned!
-
- Series 58 Champion
- Posts: 2010
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: Cardiff
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
David Williams wrote:Just shows. I didn't even think we were being negative or locking horns. But Gavin will be upset not to figure in this negativity hall of fame.Charlie Reams wrote:David O'Donnell and David Williams, the two most negative particles in the universe, lock horns. But will they attract or repel? Stay tuned!
I think young Charlie was trying to fabricate a little dispute for his own entertainment. Must be a quiet week.
Edit: have just seen that Charlie has replied. I agree with Charlie though, I don't think a few appearances on Countdown can transform us into divaesque prima donnas who suddenly demand only blue M&Ms in the green room. If we wanted fame we'd apply to BB and if we wanted money we'd apply to Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
bollocks
-
- Series 58 Champion
- Posts: 2010
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: Cardiff
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Big ol' hairy ones: gaze upon them enshrouded in the green hue of envy.D Eadie wrote:bollocks
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
The bollocks comment wasn't necessarily aimed at any one in particular, i was in the middle of typing out a response to the stuff about ratings and money etc, but halfway through, i thought 'bollocks', so i typed that instead. Why use 500 words when 1 will doDavid O'Donnell wrote:Big ol' hairy ones: gaze upon them enshrouded in the green hue of envy.D Eadie wrote:bollocks
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I assumed it was aimed at me.D Eadie wrote:The bollocks comment wasn't necessarily aimed at any one in particular, i was in the middle of typing out a response to the stuff about ratings and money etc, but halfway through, i thought 'bollocks', so i typed that instead. Why use 500 words when 1 will do
This goes back to one of the previous specials. Two well-to-do gents (one was a high court judge), who had happily given up a few hundred pounds worth of their own time, enjoyed themselves greatly, produced a good contest. How do you reward them? You could give them a token memento, a piece of crystal, whatever. You could give a small prize to the winner. Actually they got £50 each. So they got a fee, and what could be construed as an insultingly small one, even if it actually cost more than some of the alternatives. At least a bit of thought would have gone into them.
It's by no means an exact parallel, but Chris Davies lives not too far from me. Suppose he was to offer me a lift to CoLin. You could take the view that he was going anyway, and was going to have a good time, so there was no need to give him anything. I don't think many would do this. Some might buy lunch, give him a gift, a bottle of wine, whatever. Many would share the petrol. Personally, as a reasonably well-heeled pensioner, I'd offer to pay for all the petrol as he was doing all the driving, and I'd still be no worse off than if I'd gone on my own. But to give him say £10 just looks cheap.
It speaks volumes for the way they treat you on Countdown that past contestants are honoured and delighted to be asked back. And it's not the lavish expenses! But I don't think it's bollocks to suggest that they get decently rewarded.
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
But... being on Countdown is the reward.David Williams wrote:I assumed it was aimed at me.D Eadie wrote:The bollocks comment wasn't necessarily aimed at any one in particular, i was in the middle of typing out a response to the stuff about ratings and money etc, but halfway through, i thought 'bollocks', so i typed that instead. Why use 500 words when 1 will do
This goes back to one of the previous specials. Two well-to-do gents (one was a high court judge), who had happily given up a few hundred pounds worth of their own time, enjoyed themselves greatly, produced a good contest. How do you reward them? You could give them a token memento, a piece of crystal, whatever. You could give a small prize to the winner. Actually they got £50 each. So they got a fee, and what could be construed as an insultingly small one, even if it actually cost more than some of the alternatives. At least a bit of thought would have gone into them.
It's by no means an exact parallel, but Chris Davies lives not too far from me. Suppose he was to offer me a lift to CoLin. You could take the view that he was going anyway, and was going to have a good time, so there was no need to give him anything. I don't think many would do this. Some might buy lunch, give him a gift, a bottle of wine, whatever. Many would share the petrol. Personally, as a reasonably well-heeled pensioner, I'd offer to pay for all the petrol as he was doing all the driving, and I'd still be no worse off than if I'd gone on my own. But to give him say £10 just looks cheap.
It speaks volumes for the way they treat you on Countdown that past contestants are honoured and delighted to be asked back. And it's not the lavish expenses! But I don't think it's bollocks to suggest that they get decently rewarded.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6408
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
Seeing Rachel in the flesh would be reward enough for me.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
David Williams wrote:I assumed it was aimed at me.D Eadie wrote:The bollocks comment wasn't necessarily aimed at any one in particular, i was in the middle of typing out a response to the stuff about ratings and money etc, but halfway through, i thought 'bollocks', so i typed that instead. Why use 500 words when 1 will do
Not at all, David - hence the "The bollocks comment wasn't necessarily aimed at any one in particular", which i wouldn't have typed if i didn't mean it. It wasn't aimed at an individual, it was just my summary of the whole thing really. Nothing personal intended.
Anyway, i didn't want to get drawn into this really, but to comment on some of your more recent points....
I don't know about the high court judge who got £50, or even when this was, so can't really respond to that. You initially stated that the guys should get a 'couple of grand', which is extremely unrealistic, to put it politely. It also looks as though you've assumed there is no prize, award, memento or anything this time round, which would actually be incorrect. Anyone who comes on the show is 'giving up their free time', special or not, thereby if they work they have to take annual leave, which is the equivalent of losing a few days wages depending on how you look at it. I think what you're forgetting is that we've not rounded anybody up at gunpoint and forced them into the back of a transit van, they've been asked if they would like to take part and have agreed. If someone got back to us and said something like 'i really can't afford to take time off at the moment' then that's fine, nothing is compulsory. As for Chris giving you a lift to CoLin, i understand the parallels you're trying to draw, but taking part in one of the stand-alone shows is certainly more appealing than having to car-share with you from Liverpool to Manchester, which would probably have even the most relaxed of folk sexually aroused at the prospect of hurling themselves from the vehicle onto the M62 at high speed as an alternative.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I assumed it was aimed at me because no-one else seemed to be talking bollocks.
Scanning the list of Specials, I think I may be recalling Terence English against Glynn Leaney. I imagine you did the same for everyone, but I just remember a £50 fee seemed a bit crass for them in particular.
I completely take on board that anyone invited is delighted to do it. If I thought you'd want me, that I could perform at anything like current standards, or that anyone would be interested to watch, I'd probably pay you for the privilege. Just thought a bit of cash aimed at a couple of lads who entertain us a lot wouldn't come amiss.
(Then again, "a 'couple of grand', which is extremely unrealistic". So a lower figure could be realistic? Sounds like the start of a negotiation to me. Meet you half way? Second thoughts - let's call it a day. Looking forward to the show.)
Scanning the list of Specials, I think I may be recalling Terence English against Glynn Leaney. I imagine you did the same for everyone, but I just remember a £50 fee seemed a bit crass for them in particular.
I completely take on board that anyone invited is delighted to do it. If I thought you'd want me, that I could perform at anything like current standards, or that anyone would be interested to watch, I'd probably pay you for the privilege. Just thought a bit of cash aimed at a couple of lads who entertain us a lot wouldn't come amiss.
(Then again, "a 'couple of grand', which is extremely unrealistic". So a lower figure could be realistic? Sounds like the start of a negotiation to me. Meet you half way? Second thoughts - let's call it a day. Looking forward to the show.)
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I didn't think that £50 was crass for doing my special. Mind you, I was still at school at the time, so money wasn't completely everything at the time.David Williams wrote:Scanning the list of Specials, I think I may be recalling Terence English against Glynn Leaney. I imagine you did the same for everyone, but I just remember a £50 fee seemed a bit crass for them in particular.
I was just happy to be able to go back and have another go at the show, which was just fantastic.
EDIT: The only slightly disappointing thing was that I never got a Countdown teapot for winning my special, so I had to wait until I won my shows in Series 60 to get my teapot
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: A LANDMARK PROGRAMME DUE?
I thought for sure the 5000th show would be over with by now!