Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Moderator: James Robinson
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Wow. I'm so glad I did it. I never had had a max game watching from home (although I had a couple on apterous) so I was well chuffed to get it whilst playing. I fished for a final E for ENATION in that last round but it wasn't to be.
I didn't realise I was on for a max game - I was so focused every round that I didn't realise I was on for it. Why are the conundrums always hard when you're on for a good score or a record? I found that with the 5 nine game with a max of 172 ages ago when the answer was RETICENCE and lots of us thought it was ECCENTRIC. I wrote the conundrum down in my usual circle and then saw STORM and then RAIN fell out. You see me shoot to look at the monitor and look for 2 dangerous seconds just to try to confirm that I hadn't written it down wrong and there were two Rs etc and even then I hadn't fully checked it but I didn't want to be beaten to the buzzer so I just pressed it and hesitantly said the answer. That's why, when it was revealed, I sank back in the chair and breathed a sigh of relief.
I'm glad all of you are enjoying the shows.
I didn't realise I was on for a max game - I was so focused every round that I didn't realise I was on for it. Why are the conundrums always hard when you're on for a good score or a record? I found that with the 5 nine game with a max of 172 ages ago when the answer was RETICENCE and lots of us thought it was ECCENTRIC. I wrote the conundrum down in my usual circle and then saw STORM and then RAIN fell out. You see me shoot to look at the monitor and look for 2 dangerous seconds just to try to confirm that I hadn't written it down wrong and there were two Rs etc and even then I hadn't fully checked it but I didn't want to be beaten to the buzzer so I just pressed it and hesitantly said the answer. That's why, when it was revealed, I sank back in the chair and breathed a sigh of relief.
I'm glad all of you are enjoying the shows.
-
- Series 59 Champion
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:26 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Very hard not to. More!!!!Kirk Bevins wrote:I'm glad all of you are enjoying the shows.
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
I'll survive. I already have 5 children anyway. LOL!Lesley Jeavons wrote:
Ah I see, and I hope you're not too disappointed and can live with that.
Thanks for the link - interesting. I think your avatar could be having an affect on Charlie's attitude these days too.
Maybe you're right, Charlie does appear to be mellowing.
And that's not a challenge to post something scathing, Charlie!
Definitely! Great telly!Kirk Bevins wrote:
I'm glad all of you are enjoying the shows.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:38 am
- Location: Enfield, Middlesex
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
My expectation was met.I expect victim #3 to face an onslaught...
Well played mate.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:59 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Another brilliant game, Kirk, well done. I felt a bit sorry for Ben, he just didn't stand a chance, poor fellow. I'll have to record the next 4 games, poo, but will watch them all when I get back next Wed. Good luck Kirk, your next opponents must all be shaking in their shoes!
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Me too, but I wouldn't mind seeing her out of itMartin Gardner wrote:I like Rachel's outfit.
Incredible performance and awesome scoring, Kirk!
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
I missed todays game can someone tell me the scores please?
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Kirk got 126 (out of a possible 126), the other guy got, like, 50-something. Kirk had won it before round 12, I believe.Eoin Monaghan wrote:I missed todays game can someone tell me the scores please?
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
thanksMichael Wallace wrote:Kirk got 126 (out of a possible 126), the other guy got, like, 50-something. Kirk had won it before round 12, I believe.Eoin Monaghan wrote:I missed todays game can someone tell me the scores please?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:14 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
What can i say. After the euphoria of beating him yesterday i got absolutely destroyed today. If you weren't my son kirk i'd hate you or then again maybe not.
- Chris Davies
- Series 61 Champion
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:50 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Congratulations Kirk!
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13359
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Brilliant game. But I would be surprised if no-one ever achieved a max in the 9-round era (even if BECLOUD is allowed). It's so much easier to get 9 maxes than 15 (or less difficult anyway - it's not easy).Charlie Reams wrote:So there you have it. The max game. And it only took 27 years. Fucking beautiful.
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Anyone here used to watch Sunset Beach in the 90s?Lesley Jeavons wrote:The turkey baster method is surely less visually pleasing. I mean, I've never googled for porn, but I guess there's more of a market for 'traditional' sex than basting...Julie T wrote:Can I have your child while I still have time, Kirk?
Turkey baster method obviously, in case this conjures up horrific images! LOL!
BTW and off topic, what's your avatar from? I saw it in a shop window and recognised it as being yours.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Why? Is that where your avatar is from?Martin Gardner wrote:Anyone here used to watch Sunset Beach in the 90s?Lesley Jeavons wrote:The turkey baster method is surely less visually pleasing. I mean, I've never googled for porn, but I guess there's more of a market for 'traditional' sex than basting...Julie T wrote:Can I have your child while I still have time, Kirk?
Turkey baster method obviously, in case this conjures up horrific images! LOL!
BTW and off topic, what's your avatar from? I saw it in a shop window and recognised it as being yours.
-
- Series 59 Champion
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:26 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
I'm somewhat ashamed to admit that I did, yes.Martin Gardner wrote:Anyone here used to watch Sunset Beach in the 90s?
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Haha no, but one of the female characters drugged her female rival and a male friend of the rival, and using a turkey baster got her pregnant with his sperm. Since then, I can never look at a turkey baster and not snigger.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
I wonder what formula you'd use for difficulty. It's a bit like tossing a coin and having 9 heads in a row, compared to 15. Obviously that's 2^9 against 2^15, so it's something along those lines.Gavin Chipper wrote:Brilliant game. But I would be surprised if no-one ever achieved a max in the 9-round era (even if BECLOUD is allowed). It's so much easier to get 9 maxes than 15 (or less difficult anyway - it's not easy).Charlie Reams wrote:So there you have it. The max game. And it only took 27 years. Fucking beautiful.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Being a bit of a stats-freak I've already looked into this. Turns out that the difficulty for a 9-rounder is 14, whereas for a 15-rounder it's -5. Crazy, huh?Martin Gardner wrote:I wonder what formula you'd use for difficulty. It's a bit like tossing a coin and having 9 heads in a row, compared to 15. Obviously that's 2^9 against 2^15, so it's something along those lines.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13359
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Yep. Something like that. The extra rounds make a big difference to the probability. The sort of person who might be good enough to expect one max game in an octochamp run over 9 rounds would expect a max about every 32 games over 15 (if all rounds were of the same type because it's easier that way).Martin Gardner wrote:I wonder what formula you'd use for difficulty. It's a bit like tossing a coin and having 9 heads in a row, compared to 15. Obviously that's 2^9 against 2^15, so it's something along those lines.Gavin Chipper wrote:Brilliant game. But I would be surprised if no-one ever achieved a max in the 9-round era (even if BECLOUD is allowed). It's so much easier to get 9 maxes than 15 (or less difficult anyway - it's not easy).Charlie Reams wrote:So there you have it. The max game. And it only took 27 years. Fucking beautiful.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13359
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
In the old final format of 14 rounds the difficulty was 3 + 4i.Michael Wallace wrote:Being a bit of a stats-freak I've already looked into this. Turns out that the difficulty for a 9-rounder is 14, whereas for a 15-rounder it's -5. Crazy, huh?Martin Gardner wrote:I wonder what formula you'd use for difficulty. It's a bit like tossing a coin and having 9 heads in a row, compared to 15. Obviously that's 2^9 against 2^15, so it's something along those lines.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Only three, Kathleen. Countdown's taking a break from Tuesday to Friday next week. Kirk's final two, all being well, will be on the following week.Kathleen Batlle wrote:Another brilliant game, Kirk, well done. I felt a bit sorry for Ben, he just didn't stand a chance, poor fellow. I'll have to record the next 4 games, poo, but will watch them all when I get back next Wed. Good luck Kirk, your next opponents must all be shaking in their shoes!
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Nooooo! The suspense will kill me! Bloomin' racing, or whatever it is.Howard Somerset wrote: Countdown's taking a break from Tuesday to Friday next week. Kirk's final two, all being well, will be on the following week.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Innis Carson
- Devotee
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:24 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Wow, just watched it there and it's sinking in just how epic an event that was. It's the understatement of the century, but congrats Kirk!
- Martin Bishop
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:29 pm
- Location: Tadworth, Surrey
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Very impressive. Annoyingly so. My fragile ego can't take much more of this. You beat me even worse on tv than you do on apterous!
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Well done Kirk! Your divinity is confirmed.
And well done everyone else for not revealing that the max game had happened (outside the spoiler threads). I just watched it on the computer and was trying not to get too excited, thinking such a momentous event would surely have been leaked.
And well done everyone else for not revealing that the max game had happened (outside the spoiler threads). I just watched it on the computer and was trying not to get too excited, thinking such a momentous event would surely have been leaked.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Thanks very much. It was very hard (particularly since Martin was talking about nobody having done that and mentioning Gallen's 14 consecutive maxes being the best or something when I got 16) but somehow we all managed to keep it quiet until screening.Nicky wrote:Well done Kirk! Your divinity is confirmed.
And well done everyone else for not revealing that the max game had happened (outside the spoiler threads). I just watched it on the computer and was trying not to get too excited, thinking such a momentous event would surely have been leaked.
- Neil Zussman
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Well done Kirk! Glad I wasn't your opponent on that day!
Out of interest, has anyone ever maxed all the letters and messed up the numbers/ conundrum before? Or is Kirk the first to max the letters full stop? I know Craig Beavers missed out on one letters round in his 120/121 but has anyone done it?
Out of interest, has anyone ever maxed all the letters and messed up the numbers/ conundrum before? Or is Kirk the first to max the letters full stop? I know Craig Beavers missed out on one letters round in his 120/121 but has anyone done it?
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13359
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Paul Gallen maxed every round except the last numbers in his CofC final. And it went to a crucial conundrum!Neil Zussman wrote:Well done Kirk! Glad I wasn't your opponent on that day!
Out of interest, has anyone ever maxed all the letters and messed up the numbers/ conundrum before? Or is Kirk the first to max the letters full stop? I know Craig Beavers missed out on one letters round in his 120/121 but has anyone done it?
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Not surprised Paul missed a max on that numbers game. The target was not achievable, and getting one away has a 76% rating.Gavin Chipper wrote:Paul Gallen maxed every round except the last numbers in his CofC final. And it went to a crucial conundrum!
Incidentally, had he scored by going 4 away, as his opponent did in that round, he'd have got a max score, even though it would've been possible to get closer to the target in R14. Would that have counted as a perfect game?
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Both players (Conor & Paul) maxed every letters round in this epic game.Neil Zussman wrote:Out of interest, has anyone ever maxed all the letters and messed up the numbers/ conundrum before?
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Double post.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
I thought you could delete it within five minutes? Guess it's less than five minutes then (as I'm not doubting your forum skills).Jon Corby wrote:Double post.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13359
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
I think I remember reading that Allan Saldanha might have done that in a supreme game. I'm not sure I'd count it.Howard Somerset wrote:Incidentally, had he scored by going 4 away, as his opponent did in that round, he'd have got a max score, even though it would've been possible to get closer to the target in R14. Would that have counted as a perfect game?
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
It shouldn't really, but apterous and CDB would probably count it as such.Howard Somerset wrote:Would that have counted as a perfect game?
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
I think for numbers you should get (10 - distance from target) points. This would make it easier clarify 'max game'.Charlie Reams wrote:It shouldn't really, but apterous and CDB would probably count it as such.Howard Somerset wrote:Would that have counted as a perfect game?
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Agreed, almost. Though I'd make it 7 for 1 away, decreasing by 1 point for every 1 further away, thus giving a bigger incentive to get it spot on.Kai Laddiman wrote:I think for numbers you should get (10 - distance from target) points. This would make it easier clarify 'max game'.Charlie Reams wrote:It shouldn't really, but apterous and CDB would probably count it as such.Howard Somerset wrote:Would that have counted as a perfect game?
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3974
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
I assume you don't mean people would get -2 points for being ten away!Howard Somerset wrote:Agreed, almost. Though I'd make it 7 for 1 away, decreasing by 1 point for every 1 further away, thus giving a bigger incentive to get it spot on.Kai Laddiman wrote:I think for numbers you should get (10 - distance from target) points. This would make it easier clarify 'max game'.Charlie Reams wrote: It shouldn't really, but apterous and CDB would probably count it as such.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:45 am
- Location: Surrey/London
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Of course, it should be some non-linear function of the distance away from the target, to reflect how much easier it is to merely get close to it. Max(10-d^2, 0), say. I'd like to see Jeff explain that to the audience, though . Howard's suggestion is in effect something like that, I suppose.
- Clive Brooker
- Devotee
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 pm
- Location: San Toy
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Have there been any changes to the scoring system since the launch of the original pilot?
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
You used to get 5 points for being closest on the numbers, even if you were more than 10 away. I think that was changed between the pilot and Episode 1, although I'm not sure.Clive Brooker wrote:Have there been any changes to the scoring system since the launch of the original pilot?
- Mike Brown
- Legend
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
- Location: King's Lynn
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
BECLOUD was definitely valid back then, so no max for Tim I'm afraid (at least not on that occasion).Martin Gardner wrote:For 15 rounds, almost certainly. For 9 rounds or even 15 we don't have nearly enough data. There's a Tim Morrissey game on the Countdown Wiki where gets 73 out of 74 with BECLOUD listed as a DC beater. But unless we find the dictionary that they used in Series 33, we will never know if it was allowed back then! This waas 13 years ago after all.
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
On the original French version you can always get six on the numbers, no matter how far away you are. I saw one episode where the first player declared nothing and the second one declared 48 or something, and got six points for it.Charlie Reams wrote:You used to get 5 points for being closest on the numbers, even if you were more than 10 away. I think that was changed between the pilot and Episode 1, although I'm not sure.Clive Brooker wrote:Have there been any changes to the scoring system since the launch of the original pilot?
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Just to have a comprehensive answer to this in one place, there have been 5 perfect letters games in the 15-round eraNeil Zussman wrote:Well done Kirk! Glad I wasn't your opponent on that day!
Out of interest, has anyone ever maxed all the letters and messed up the numbers/ conundrum before? Or is Kirk the first to max the letters full stop? I know Craig Beavers missed out on one letters round in his 120/121 but has anyone done it?
The first and second were by Conor and me, in the series 54 semi
The third was by Paul Gallen, in the CofC final (incidentally he only missed 3 letters maxes in his 4 CofC appearances, the highest standard at which Countdown has ever been played in my book)
The fourth was by Craig Beevers, in the series 57 final, which was a different game to his 120/121
And the fifth is the subject of this very thread. Well in Kirk!
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
At least 5...Paul Howe wrote: Just to have a comprehensive answer to this in one place, there have been 5 perfect letters games in the 15-round era
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
No. Shut up. Me and Conor definitely had the first perfect letters game and that is that. In my opinion there's no chance of finding another amongst the big pile that we don't have records for, especially Julian's.Charlie Reams wrote:At least 5...Paul Howe wrote: Just to have a comprehensive answer to this in one place, there have been 5 perfect letters games in the 15-round era
Seriously though, it's daft that we don't have complete records of the best (for now) octorun in Countdown history. Someone must surely have them? Same goes for Chris Wills, I know his games used to be on his website, not sure if that's still the case.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Wheels are in motion.Paul Howe wrote: Seriously though, it's daft that we don't have complete records of the best (for now) octorun in Countdown history. Someone must surely have them?
-
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3661
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009
Finally got round to watching this. I liked Dr. Phil's anecdote.
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks