It's actually listed as a mass noun - the fabric part of the definition is only a subsense, introduced by the black square. So imho it's a nay.Gary Male wrote:After seeing it disallowed in quite a few games recently on Apterous, MOHAIRS yay or nay? It's listed as a fabric, so logically should be allowed the plural? Plus the entry strongly suggests that their are different types of mohair.
CountMax errors
- Frank Rodolf
- Rookie
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:22 pm
- Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Re: CountMax errors
Frank
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
That doesn't make any sense. If you can pluralise it in any sense then MOHAIRS is valid.Frank Rodolf wrote:It's actually listed as a mass noun - the fabric part of the definition is only a subsense, introduced by the black square. So imho it's a nay.Gary Male wrote:After seeing it disallowed in quite a few games recently on Apterous, MOHAIRS yay or nay? It's listed as a fabric, so logically should be allowed the plural? Plus the entry strongly suggests that their are different types of mohair.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: CountMax errors
GATEAUS appears to be missing from CountMax, even though it's listed in the ODE2r as an alternative plural spelling for GATEAU.
DC offered it in one the first of Anita Freeland's heats.
DC offered it in one the first of Anita Freeland's heats.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: CountMax errors
GATEAUS appears in my version of Countmax. HmmmHoward Somerset wrote:GATEAUS appears to be missing from CountMax, even though it's listed in the ODE2r as an alternative plural spelling for GATEAU.
DC offered it in one the first of Anita Freeland's heats.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: CountMax errors
Thanks Kirk. I'm a little bit out of date. I was looking at the output of a wiki run which had been run in September 2007, and had missed GATEAUS. Clearly the CountMax dictionary has been updated since then.Kirk Bevins wrote:GATEAUS appears in my version of Countmax. HmmmHoward Somerset wrote:GATEAUS appears to be missing from CountMax, even though it's listed in the ODE2r as an alternative plural spelling for GATEAU.
DC offered it in one the first of Anita Freeland's heats.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: CountMax errors
I had GRANITES disallowed, but Soosbury Rules lists is as acceptable.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Apterous uses the same dictionary for everything. The alternative would be far too confusing.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: CountMax errors
Another mass noun thingy - I recently didn't risk DILUTIONS against Ollie Garner, settling for DILUTION, and DILUTIONS was allowed yet DILUTION is a mass noun. That cost me a Benjamin.
Last edited by Kai Laddiman on Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Re: CountMax errors
In the ODE2r GRANITES is explicitly stated at the start of the book as one of the mass nouns that can take a plural. But television doesn't really follow that. Probably best to leave it and just offer ANGRIEST or something next time.Kai Laddiman wrote:I had GRANITES disallowed, but Soosbury Rules lists is as acceptable.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: CountMax errors
Gary Male wrote:In the ODE2r GRANITES is explicitly stated at the start of the book as one of the mass nouns that can take a plural. But television doesn't really follow that. Probably best to leave it and just offer ANGRIEST or something next time.Kai Laddiman wrote:I had GRANITES disallowed, but Soosbury Rules lists is as acceptable.
But the guidelines you get when you're a contestant state:
Categories of mass nouns that can take a plural:
rocks: e.g. granite/granites, lava/lavas, clay/clays
So this implies that they should allow it. I'd be annoyed if Susie disallowed it when it's in the guidelines you are sent as a contestant before appearing.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: CountMax errors
Why doesn't someone (hint hint) make a dictionary with mass nouns pluralisable or unpluralisable?Kirk Bevins wrote:Gary Male wrote:In the ODE2r GRANITES is explicitly stated at the start of the book as one of the mass nouns that can take a plural. But television doesn't really follow that. Probably best to leave it and just offer ANGRIEST or something next time.Kai Laddiman wrote:I had GRANITES disallowed, but Soosbury Rules lists is as acceptable.
But the guidelines you get when you're a contestant state:
Categories of mass nouns that can take a plural:
rocks: e.g. granite/granites, lava/lavas, clay/clays
So this implies that they should allow it. I'd be annoyed if Susie disallowed it when it's in the guidelines you are sent as a contestant before appearing.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: CountMax errors
I believe the spirit of the TV show's rules is essentially that, if a non-contrived sentence using the plural of a mass noun can be readily thought of (the food dishes principle), then it's allowed. I imagine chemists, for example, might often talk of a number of flasks containing the same chemical at different DILUTIONS.Kai Laddiman wrote:Another mass noun thingy - I recently didn't risk DILUTIONS against Ollie Garner, settling for DILTION, and DILUTIONS was allowed yet DILUTION is a mass noun.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
The also talk about making water from two hydrogens and an oxygen...Phil Reynolds wrote:I imagine chemists, for example, might often talk of a number of flasks containing the same chemical at different DILUTIONS.
Re: CountMax errors
All of which just serves to confirm that the mass noun tag is a good idea poorly implemented. If anyone from OUP ever reads this, please give us a pluralisable mass noun tag!
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: CountMax errors
Fuck right off! Any self respecting chemist would talk about different molarities/(insert quantity calculus units here)Phil Reynolds wrote:I believe the spirit of the TV show's rules is essentially that, if a non-contrived sentence using the plural of a mass noun can be readily thought of (the food dishes principle), then it's allowed. I imagine chemists, for example, might often talk of a number of flasks containing the same chemical at different DILUTIONS.Kai Laddiman wrote:Another mass noun thingy - I recently didn't risk DILUTIONS against Ollie Garner, settling for DILTION, and DILUTIONS was allowed yet DILUTION is a mass noun.
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: CountMax errors
Yeah but only when we're being lazy. If I were describing a chemical mechanism informally I might say compound X accepts two hydrogens, but on an exam I'd talk about two hydrogen atoms or ions or isotopes or whatever depending on your respective element.Charlie Reams wrote:They also talk about making water from two hydrogens and an oxygen...
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Even Des O'Connor eventually figured out that the dictionary contains rather a lot of informality.Dinos Sfyris wrote:Yeah but only when we're being lazy. If I were describing a chemical mechanism informally I might say compound X accepts two hydrogens, but on an exam I'd talk about two hydrogen atoms or ions or isotopes or whatever depending on your respective element.Charlie Reams wrote:They also talk about making water from two hydrogens and an oxygen...
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: CountMax errors
lol I loved those bits.Charlie Reams wrote:Even Des O'Connor eventually figured out that the dictionary contains rather a lot of informality.Dinos Sfyris wrote:Yeah but only when we're being lazy. If I were describing a chemical mechanism informally I might say compound X accepts two hydrogens, but on an exam I'd talk about two hydrogen atoms or ions or isotopes or whatever depending on your respective element.Charlie Reams wrote:They also talk about making water from two hydrogens and an oxygen...
Des: Isnt that slang?
Susie: Yes but it is also in the dictionary
Des: *brief puzzlement* Okey Doke...
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: CountMax errors
Who said I was talking about self-respecting chemists? Presumably the people who create homeopathic placebos (sorry, "remedies") by diluting the active ingredient to the point where there are no molecules of the original compound left are employed as chemists, but I doubt they have much respect for themselves.Dinos Sfyris wrote:Fuck right off! Any self respecting chemist would talk about different molarities/(insert quantity calculus units here)Phil Reynolds wrote:I imagine chemists, for example, might often talk of a number of flasks containing the same chemical at different DILUTIONS.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Interesting question, and totally off-topic, but I wonder how many homeopathists actually believe their own bullshit? Difficult to find out, but honestly I would assume quite a few of them. Seriously, it's amazing what people will believe in.Phil Reynolds wrote:Presumably the people who create homeopathic placebos (sorry, "remedies") by diluting the active ingredient to the point where there are no molecules of the original compound left are employed as chemists, but I doubt they have much respect for themselves.
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: CountMax errors
Charlie Reams wrote:in.
Re: CountMax errors
Has JOINDERS been kicked out of the ODE? Just had it disallowed on apterous.
Also, what about MANTEAUX? Not sure about this one, but MANTEAU is OK and a lot of the -EAU words take an x plural.
Also, what about MANTEAUX? Not sure about this one, but MANTEAU is OK and a lot of the -EAU words take an x plural.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: CountMax errors
JOINDER is a mass noun plural but they always allow it on the show.Paul Howe wrote:Has JOINDERS been kicked out of the ODE? Just had it disallowed on apterous.
Also, what about MANTEAUX? Not sure about this one, but MANTEAU is OK and a lot of the -EAU words take an x plural.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: CountMax errors
My bro just had FANDOMS disallowed in a practice against Prime, but having looked FANDOM up, it is only listed as a noun, not a mass noun.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Oh yeah they've been allowing JOINDERS for years, that should be in there. I seem to think Chris Wills got it against John Rawnsley.Kirk Bevins wrote:JOINDER is a mass noun plural but they always allow it on the show.Paul Howe wrote:Has JOINDERS been kicked out of the ODE? Just had it disallowed on apterous.
Also, what about MANTEAUX? Not sure about this one, but MANTEAU is OK and a lot of the -EAU words take an x plural.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
Re: CountMax errors
I just had FUNNER disallowed on apterous, which, while admittedly rather clumsy, should be allowed under the:
"single syllable adjectives automatically having comparatives and superlatives allowed" rule.
"single syllable adjectives automatically having comparatives and superlatives allowed" rule.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=789Julie T wrote:I just had FUNNER disallowed on apterous, which, while admittedly rather clumsy, should be allowed under the:
"single syllable adjectives automatically having comparatives and superlatives allowed" rule.
Re: CountMax errors
Thanks, Charlie. If Susie has specifically said that it's not allowed, then fair enough.Charlie Reams wrote:http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=789Julie T wrote:I just had FUNNER disallowed on apterous, which, while admittedly rather clumsy, should be allowed under the:
"single syllable adjectives automatically having comparatives and superlatives allowed" rule.
I agree with those who said that she shouldn't make exceptions to rules, though. It does confuse matters.
Do you know if there any other words that she does this to?
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: CountMax errors
I used to get given homeopathic remedies as a child. I remember the day after taking a prescribed homeopathic dose I returned to my 'doctor' and he asked me if I'd had any dreams. I told him the semi-remembered dream from the night before (something about factories), upon which he turned his head as though to look at some unseen authority figure and remarked "it worked", with a really serious look on his face. Even as a nine year old boy I thought "lol wat".Charlie Reams wrote:Interesting question, and totally off-topic, but I wonder how many homeopathists actually believe their own bullshit? Difficult to find out, but honestly I would assume quite a few of them. Seriously, it's amazing what people will believe in.Phil Reynolds wrote:Presumably the people who create homeopathic placebos (sorry, "remedies") by diluting the active ingredient to the point where there are no molecules of the original compound left are employed as chemists, but I doubt they have much respect for themselves.
Then again, my old GP once read my palm, so who can you trust these days?
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: CountMax errors
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:54 pm
- Location: London
Re: CountMax errors
Most of the time my risky words are rubbish and I don't bat an eyelid when they are not in. Today, I had "sieged" ruled out in my Daily Duel. I had a nagging sense that it was dodgy as I played it (mainly because it wasn't "besieged"), but its disallowment still caused the left half of my one joined eyebrow to raise slightly in surprise.
Re: CountMax errors
Were the other letters G A N ?Rob Thomas wrote:Most of the time my risky words are rubbish and I don't bat an eyelid when they are not in. Today, I had "sieged" ruled out in my Daily Duel. I had a nagging sense that it was dodgy as I played it (mainly because it wasn't "besieged"), but its disallowment still caused the left half of my one joined eyebrow to raise slightly in surprise.
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:54 pm
- Location: London
Re: CountMax errors
Sadly no. If they were, I would have been able to release / free / detatch / withdraw my doubts...
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Did VERONALS ever get added back to Apterous? It's been allowed loads of times since Series 49, but since the CDB index is working backwards, I'm not sure how many hits I will get for it. Hmm so why don't I try?
Two so far, although I think it's been allowed more often that than, just the recaps don't exist yet.
Two so far, although I think it's been allowed more often that than, just the recaps don't exist yet.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- JimBentley
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2820
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
OK, I'm gone through all the comments on this thread since the last update and am going to post the new wordlist in the next half hour or so.
The following will be removed from the list:
CARLING
CARLINGS
FILABEG
FILABEGS
MEOW
MEOWED
MEOWING
MEOWS
TAGATIED
TAGATIES
WHITIER
WHITIEST
And this lot will be added:
BENTER
BENTEST
COZENAGES
EUCRITES
FANDOMS
FAUXER
FAUXEST
GRANITES
JOINDERS
KATSINAM
MATTEST
MOHAIRS
PIQUETS
RAREBITS
TAGATIS
VERONALS
If anyone strongly believes that any of the above are wrong, post here quick-smart. Ta!
EDIT: Here is the latest list, anyway. I can always do more tinkering later.
The following will be removed from the list:
CARLING
CARLINGS
FILABEG
FILABEGS
MEOW
MEOWED
MEOWING
MEOWS
TAGATIED
TAGATIES
WHITIER
WHITIEST
And this lot will be added:
BENTER
BENTEST
COZENAGES
EUCRITES
FANDOMS
FAUXER
FAUXEST
GRANITES
JOINDERS
KATSINAM
MATTEST
MOHAIRS
PIQUETS
RAREBITS
TAGATIS
VERONALS
If anyone strongly believes that any of the above are wrong, post here quick-smart. Ta!
EDIT: Here is the latest list, anyway. I can always do more tinkering later.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Looks great, good job.
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
FETTUCINI isn't in anymore of course, but then it's somewhat unlike that those letters will come up. But still...
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: CountMax errors
Also, CAFETIERE isn't in my version of Countmax.Martin Gardner wrote:FETTUCINI isn't in anymore of course, but then it's somewhat unlike that those letters will come up. But still...
- JimBentley
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2820
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Oh shit, yeah, I hadn't realised. Right, new version here.Kirk Bevins wrote:Also, CAFETIERE isn't in my version of Countmax.Martin Gardner wrote:FETTUCINI isn't in anymore of course, but then it's somewhat unlike that those letters will come up. But still...
Keep them coming, I'm going to try to keep this thing reasonably current if I can.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: CountMax errors
Not necessarily a CountMax error but I think MANIAE should be a word as HERNIAE, MEDIAE etc. are wods.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: CountMax errors
I presume HERNIAE is an alternative plural of HERNIA, but what is MEDIAE? Clearly not a plural of MEDIA, since that is already a plural.Kai Laddiman wrote:Not necessarily a CountMax error but I think MANIAE should be a word as HERNIAE, MEDIAE etc. are wods.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: CountMax errors
A media is a layer in the wall of a blood cell as well.Phil Reynolds wrote:I presume HERNIAE is an alternative plural of HERNIA, but what is MEDIAE? Clearly not a plural of MEDIA, since that is already a plural.Kai Laddiman wrote:Not necessarily a CountMax error but I think MANIAE should be a word as HERNIAE, MEDIAE etc. are wods.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: CountMax errors
Thanks Kai. Just checked and it's listed with that sense in Collins Dictionary. It's not in the online Oxford though for some reason.Kai Laddiman wrote:A media is a layer in the wall of a blood cell as well.
- Mike Brown
- Legend
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
- Location: King's Lynn
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Personally, I think MEOW (etc.) should still be allowed, on the basis that under its own entry, it's not specified as being a US spelling, but am willing to concede because it is listed as being such under MIAOW! I can't see anything wrong with TAGATIED (how else would you spell the past tense of TAGATI?), although I can see that perhaps TAGATIES might be iffy. Another case of Oxford being a bit lax by not specifying, I guess.
- Mike Brown
- Legend
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
- Location: King's Lynn
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Don't think VERONALS should be allowed, for exactly the reasons originally given by Kirk.
- JimBentley
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2820
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Yeah, I agree, especially as TAGATIING pretty much has to stay given that TAGATI is a verb. At the time it seemed wrong taking out TAGATIES and leaving TAGATIED but now I think about it, TAGATIED could probably stay; TAGATI/TAGATIS/TAGATIED/TAGATIING. I'm with you on MEOW as well, but when Julian posted it I assumed it must have changed with the latest revision.Mike Brown wrote:I can't see anything wrong with TAGATIED (how else would you spell the past tense of TAGATI?), although I can see that perhaps TAGATIES might be iffy.
- Mike Brown
- Legend
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
- Location: King's Lynn
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
The ODE entry hasn't changed, it's just that Susie disallowed it on the September 26th show of last year (which prompted Julian's post). Still think we should probably allow it, though. I'm not even convinced it *is* purely a US spelling, although I think I would always use the admittedly slightly odd MIAOW spelling myself.JimBentley wrote:I'm with you on MEOW as well, but when Julian posted it I assumed it must have changed with the latest revision.
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
They have allowed it before (as cited above) but the dictionary entry might have changed since. I've just Googled OPALINES on the Countdown Wiki and it only comes up with one hit in the plural (loads in the singular) and it was disallowed - Aaron Webber vs. Anita Freeland. So that gets zero hits as a valid word, and VERONALS at the very least gets two.Mike Brown wrote:Don't think VERONALS should be allowed, for exactly the reasons originally given by Kirk.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Mike Brown
- Legend
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
- Location: King's Lynn
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
They used to allow the plural of OPALINE on the grounds that it wasn't listed as a mass noun, even though its equivalent MILK-GLASS was (dodgy logic, in my opinion, but I suppose it was kind of following the dictionary to the letter). That anomaly seems to have been addressed by Damian and Susie, so I suspect they would now almost certainly disallow VERONALS because BARBITONE is listed as a mass noun, and I'm pretty certain its plural would be considered verboten.Martin Gardner wrote:They have allowed it before (as cited above) but the dictionary entry might have changed since. I've just Googled OPALINES on the Countdown Wiki and it only comes up with one hit in the plural (loads in the singular) and it was disallowed - Aaron Webber vs. Anita Freeland. So that gets zero hits as a valid word, and VERONALS at the very least gets two.
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Hmm I'm on that page now, it says:Mike Brown wrote:They used to allow the plural of OPALINE on the grounds that it wasn't listed as a mass noun, even though its equivalent MILK-GLASS was (dodgy logic, in my opinion, but I suppose it was kind of following the dictionary to the letter). That anomaly seems to have been addressed by Damian and Susie, so I suspect they would now almost certainly disallow VERONALS because BARBITONE is listed as a mass noun, and I'm pretty certain its plural would be considered verboten.Martin Gardner wrote:They have allowed it before (as cited above) but the dictionary entry might have changed since. I've just Googled OPALINES on the Countdown Wiki and it only comes up with one hit in the plural (loads in the singular) and it was disallowed - Aaron Webber vs. Anita Freeland. So that gets zero hits as a valid word, and VERONALS at the very least gets two.
I think it's somewhat pluralisable because you could take two veronals before you go to sleep (like aspirine). Hmm. I'm now officially on the fence on this one.noun [mass noun] a long-acting sedative and sleep-inducing drug or the barbituate type.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: CountMax errors
Martin Gardner wrote: (like aspirine)
Have to stop you here. It's spelt ASPIRIN.
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4552
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: CountMax errors
This does not make sense. I am sorry, Kirk.Kirk Bevins wrote:Martin Gardner wrote: (like aspirine)
Have to stop you here.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: CountMax errors
Just I am not because very good at grammar and construction sentences does not mean have to you pick up on my mistakes.Jon O'Neill wrote:This does not make sense. I am sorry, Kirk.Kirk Bevins wrote:Martin Gardner wrote: (like aspirine)
Have to stop you here.
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Ha yes, good spot. I thought it was like adrenalin(e) but no, there's no e. There is one in French, which confused me.Kirk Bevins wrote:Martin Gardner wrote: (like aspirine)
Have to stop you here. It's spelt ASPIRIN.
Speaking of aspirin, it says : "noun [mass noun] (pl. same or aspirins)." See brandy for another example of this.
Final word, as I'm bored of talking about it, the plural of VERONALS is somewhat unlikely but at least possible in the sentence "I took two veronals before I went to bed." So if you're allowing anything that's possible, even if unlikely, I say yes to this one.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: CountMax errors
Velvet just got COZIEST against me on Apterous. Is that not American?
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Callum Laddiman
- Rookie
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere in East Sussex
Re: CountMax errors
Probrably not, I think it is just another way of spelling it.Martin Gardner wrote:Velvet just got COZIEST against me on Apterous. Is that not American?
Oh, don't you just love pets..... Ahhhhhhh......
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: CountMax errors
It is indeed listed as cosy (US cozy).Martin Gardner wrote:Velvet just got COZIEST against me on Apterous. Is that not American?
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: CountMax errors
Is there an electronic version available?JimBentley wrote:Right, new version here.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
-
- Series 62 Champion
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:13 pm
Re: CountMax errors
Is probrably another way of spelling probablyCallum Laddiman wrote:Probrably not, I think it is just another way of spelling it.Martin Gardner wrote:Velvet just got COZIEST against me on Apterous. Is that not American?
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: CountMax errors
Probrably.Oliver Garner wrote:Is probrably another way of spelling probablyCallum Laddiman wrote:Probrably not, I think it is just another way of spelling it.Martin Gardner wrote:Velvet just got COZIEST against me on Apterous. Is that not American?
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.