Spoilers for Wednesday 7th January 2026 (Series 93, Heat 3)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 14465
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Spoilers for Wednesday 7th January 2026 (Series 93, Heat 3)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

That first numbers could be done more easily with 75×8-7+100/25 = 597.

Also in the 690 round the challenger did the classic 5×50/25 to make a 10 instead of 50/5.
Philip A
Kiloposter
Posts: 1714
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2021 2:56 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 7th January 2026 (Series 93, Heat 3)

Post by Philip A »

Numbers trick you sometimes. TBH it took me 20 seconds to spot the 75*8 route.
Series 78 Runner-up
John Garcia
Enthusiast
Posts: 387
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 7th January 2026 (Series 93, Heat 3)

Post by John Garcia »

Gavin Chipper wrote: Wed Jan 07, 2026 3:16 pm That first numbers could be done more easily with 75×8-7+100/25 = 597.
That's the way I did it too.

p.s. anyone else notice the backhander Rachel gave Megel when he chose 4 large in the 1st numbers:
"Your favourite that you've prepared for, and we've seen evidence of that now"
:D :) ;)
Philip Wilson
Devotee
Posts: 693
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 7th January 2026 (Series 93, Heat 3)

Post by Philip Wilson »

John Garcia wrote: Wed Jan 07, 2026 5:14 pm
Gavin Chipper wrote: Wed Jan 07, 2026 3:16 pm That first numbers could be done more easily with 75×8-7+100/25 = 597.
That's the way I did it too.
Me too. Also, absolutely no offence to anyone who might be reading this of course, but as the challenger had already beaten Megel with 4L in rounds 3 and 9, it did seem a strange decision not to choose it for R14!
Post Reply