I thought the "obvious" way to do that 3rd numbers was 75*50/6+6*100/25 = 649. It's essentially a 25 squared method.
The last numbers could also be done an easier way than Rachel's method - (8+4)*3*10+2 = 362. Rachel did 45*8+2, getting the 45 a rather clunky way.
By the way, while I'm here - the other day did they ask whether anyone had ever played their parent/offspring in a game? I wasn't paying that much attention and can't remember what day it was or why it might have come up. But anyway Wayne Summers famously lost to his father in a heat game before going on to win the series and the CoC.
Spoilers for Monday 8th September 2025 (Series 92, Heat 51)
Moderator: James Robinson
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 14274
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm
Re: Spoilers for Monday 8th September 2025 (Series 92, Heat 51)
Yeah that's the way I did it too.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 2:46 pm I thought the "obvious" way to do that 3rd numbers was 75*50/6+6*100/25 = 649. It's essentially a 25 squared method.
Not the biggest numbers faux-pas on today's show though.
Colin asked "A number 1 followed by 100 zeros is known by what name?"
Rachel replied "A googolplex".
The correct answer was a googol. A googolplex is a 1 followed by 10^100 zeros, so slightly out.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 14274
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Monday 8th September 2025 (Series 92, Heat 51)
If she'd said "four" she would have been closer arithmetically speaking, if not conceptually so.John Garcia wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 3:27 pmYeah that's the way I did it too.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 2:46 pm I thought the "obvious" way to do that 3rd numbers was 75*50/6+6*100/25 = 649. It's essentially a 25 squared method.
Not the biggest numbers faux-pas on today's show though.
Colin asked "A number 1 followed by 100 zeros is known by what name?"
Rachel replied "A googolplex".
The correct answer was a googol. A googolplex is a 1 followed by 10^100 zeros, so slightly out.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm
Re: Spoilers for Monday 8th September 2025 (Series 92, Heat 51)
Yeah. There aren't enough atoms in the universe to even write out that number.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 4:28 pm If she'd said "four" she would have been closer arithmetically speaking, if not conceptually so.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2019 6:05 am
Re: Spoilers for Monday 8th September 2025 (Series 92, Heat 51)
r11 alt: (I think easier) 4*8*10+3*2*7=362
- Adam Dexter
- Devotee
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
- Location: Kidderminster
Re: Spoilers for Monday 8th September 2025 (Series 92, Heat 51)
I gave up on 45 * 8 + 2 and did
(10+3)*4*7 + 2
ADAM DEXTER: MAXED DATER
We're off to button moon
We're off to button moon
