Spoilers for Wednesday 6th November 2024 (Series 90, Heat 86)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 14273
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Spoilers for Wednesday 6th November 2024 (Series 90, Heat 86)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Well done to David Roe for becoming an octochamp and narrowly missing out on being the number 1 seed (but ending up 3rd). I thought it was interesting what Colin said about the tie-break if he'd got the conundrum. David would have ended up on 819 points, the same as Fiona Wood, but Colin said he'd be ahead by virtue of his highest score (117 to 113). But my understanding (and according to the wiki) was that it's done on number of conundrums solved as the first tie-breaker. They both solved 4, but it would be 5-4 to David had he got today's. I wondered if it would have been a tie so Colin just cut that bit out and moved on to the next tie breaking mechanism, but it seems not.
John Garcia
Enthusiast
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 6th November 2024 (Series 90, Heat 86)

Post by John Garcia »

R2: HOWDIES for 7
R7: EQUATORS as an alt 8
R9: There was a 9 which I missed
R13: ELECTRON for 8
Last edited by John Garcia on Wed Nov 06, 2024 7:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
L'oisleatch McGraw
Devotee
Posts: 990
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:46 am
Location: Waterford
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 6th November 2024 (Series 90, Heat 86)

Post by L'oisleatch McGraw »

I guess they don't want Susie looking into glory holes anymore?
Some serious censorship going on in Rd10.

I wonder what it was that they said that the C4 censors deemed not screenable, that was deemed fine by those in the studio at the time?
Last edited by L'oisleatch McGraw on Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
:arrow: :arrow: :arrow: S:778-ochamp
Mark Deeks wrote: Why are you always so weird about everything?
Philip A
Kiloposter
Posts: 1564
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2021 2:56 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 6th November 2024 (Series 90, Heat 86)

Post by Philip A »

John Garcia wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 7:31 pm R2: HOWDIES for 7
R7: EQUATORS as an alt 8
R9: There was a 9 which I missed
R13: ELECTRON for 8
HOWDIES unfortunately is invalid due to HOWDY only being an exclamation and not a noun or verb.
Series 78 Runner-up
User avatar
Graeme Cole
Series 65 Champion
Posts: 2150
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 6th November 2024 (Series 90, Heat 86)

Post by Graeme Cole »

Gavin Chipper wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 5:10 pm Well done to David Roe for becoming an octochamp and narrowly missing out on being the number 1 seed (but ending up 3rd). I thought it was interesting what Colin said about the tie-break if he'd got the conundrum. David would have ended up on 819 points, the same as Fiona Wood, but Colin said he'd be ahead by virtue of his highest score (117 to 113). But my understanding (and according to the wiki) was that it's done on number of conundrums solved as the first tie-breaker. They both solved 4, but it would be 5-4 to David had he got today's. I wondered if it would have been a tie so Colin just cut that bit out and moved on to the next tie breaking mechanism, but it seems not.
This was my understanding too, but it's so rare for two players to be equal on both wins and points that the rules might have been changed years ago and we'd never have noticed. The last time it mattered appears to have been in 2009, when Kirk says it was conundrum spots that put Cate Henderson above Jimmy Gough in Series 60.
David Roe
Enthusiast
Posts: 409
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:58 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 6th November 2024 (Series 90, Heat 86)

Post by David Roe »

From memory, Colin said that the number of conundrums was tied as well, but I couldn't swear to it. I do think that number of conundrums got a mention, though, but I would also have said that my hypothetical highest would have been 1 more than Fiona's (not 5 more) so clearly my memory can't be fully relied on.

As for round 10, one of the contestants said "Gollies" so after a discussion it was reshot so that we both said "Glories".
Philip A
Kiloposter
Posts: 1564
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2021 2:56 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 6th November 2024 (Series 90, Heat 86)

Post by Philip A »

David Roe wrote: Fri Nov 08, 2024 11:29 am As for round 10, one of the contestants said "Gollies" so after a discussion it was reshot so that we both said "Glories".
Probably a sensible recut.
Series 78 Runner-up
Post Reply