Spoilers For Monday August 4th 2014
Moderator: James Robinson
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Spoilers For Monday August 4th 2014
So, a lot seems to have happened in the last 7 days, since our last viewing of Countdown..............
We have a Champion of Champions tournament to look forward to at the start of next year, COHUD2014 has been announced, and there's no horse racing to annoy us from our viewing of our favourite show .............. well, not for 2 more weeks anyway
Ah well, let's get onto the better news for now anyway.
She might be controversial in some people's eyes, but Tricia Pay has proven to be a formidable opponent, and despite surviving 2 close calls in crucial conundrums, she has her half-octochampdom to her name (and is currently #1 seed to boot, at the moment), and will be hoping to be the first octochamp of the series on Thursday.
Bill Turnbull is in DC up until Thursday, before ex-Blue Peter presenter, Gethin Jones, comes in on Friday. (Incidentally, his new ITV game show, The 21st Question is starting today in The Chase slot, presumably trying to be better than last year's summer filler, Take On The Twisters.)
Andy will be around with the recap later.
We have a Champion of Champions tournament to look forward to at the start of next year, COHUD2014 has been announced, and there's no horse racing to annoy us from our viewing of our favourite show .............. well, not for 2 more weeks anyway
Ah well, let's get onto the better news for now anyway.
She might be controversial in some people's eyes, but Tricia Pay has proven to be a formidable opponent, and despite surviving 2 close calls in crucial conundrums, she has her half-octochampdom to her name (and is currently #1 seed to boot, at the moment), and will be hoping to be the first octochamp of the series on Thursday.
Bill Turnbull is in DC up until Thursday, before ex-Blue Peter presenter, Gethin Jones, comes in on Friday. (Incidentally, his new ITV game show, The 21st Question is starting today in The Chase slot, presumably trying to be better than last year's summer filler, Take On The Twisters.)
Andy will be around with the recap later.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday August 4th 2014
Another easy numbers...
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:45 pm
- Location: West Bridgford
Re: Spoilers For Monday August 4th 2014
Pretty sure Tick said TILTED in Round 5 instead of JILTED, unless I'm going crazy
Definitely not Jamie McNeill or Schrodinger's Cat....
- Innis Carson
- Devotee
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:24 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday August 4th 2014
Think his accent makes it ambiguous, but it sounded close enough to JILTED to me that I'd give him the benefit of the doubt.James Laverty wrote:Pretty sure Tick said TILTED in Round 5 instead of JILTED, unless I'm going crazy
- Mark Kudlowski
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 473
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:15 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday August 4th 2014
4th numbers: ((75 + 8) x 7) + 1
Re: Spoilers For Monday August 4th 2014
Kiattisik Thepsuria is well known in Thailand for his Scrabble abilities. Played the odd tournament over here. Jessica knows him well on the Internet circuit - met him once at New Malden. Thai people have a very bad concept of the English Language, although very capable Scrabble players, their accent is very difficult to understand. Jessica found this out when she played in the WYSC in the Far East and spoke to many of the young players.James Laverty wrote:Pretty sure Tick said TILTED in Round 5 instead of JILTED, unless I'm going crazy
Must admit I heard TILTED too
Mauro
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday August 4th 2014
In previous games I've been defending Tricia against various accusations, but I turned to this thread thinking I couldn't defend her this time. And there's nothing!
The EMOTES round. C2. "Six". C1. Agonisingly long pause. "Five".
Incidentally, I heard JILTED.
The EMOTES round. C2. "Six". C1. Agonisingly long pause. "Five".
Incidentally, I heard JILTED.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday August 4th 2014
She might have had a risky 6 or 7 that she was agonising over. She wouldn't have been able to get away with cheating here without it looking really obvious. It would have been - Long pause, "Six. Er, not written down." That would have looked pretty bad.David Williams wrote:In previous games I've been defending Tricia against various accusations, but I turned to this thread thinking I couldn't defend her this time. And there's nothing!
The EMOTES round. C2. "Six". C1. Agonisingly long pause. "Five".
Incidentally, I heard JILTED.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday August 4th 2014
It's possible. I know it's dangerous to read too much into body language and the like, but it didn't come over to me as "I'l stick with a safe five because my six/seven that I thought of and rejected during the thirty seconds is so risky I think my best bet is to assume that your word is invalid". It was a lot more like "Even now you've declared a six I still can't see one."Gavin Chipper wrote:She might have had a risky 6 or 7 that she was agonising over.David Williams wrote:In previous games I've been defending Tricia against various accusations, but I turned to this thread thinking I couldn't defend her this time. And there's nothing!
The EMOTES round. C2. "Six". C1. Agonisingly long pause. "Five".
Incidentally, I heard JILTED.
- Clive Brooker
- Devotee
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 pm
- Location: San Toy
Re: Spoilers For Monday August 4th 2014
This reminds me of the "slow pass" in bridge. Etiquette demands that if you think for a conspicuously long time over an opening bid, you can't then pass. If your partner does this, you mustn't take advantage.Gavin Chipper wrote:She might have had a risky 6 or 7 that she was agonising over. She wouldn't have been able to get away with cheating here without it looking really obvious. It would have been - Long pause, "Six. Er, not written down." That would have looked pretty bad.
Back to Countdown, what should you do if you realise you've hesitated far too long over a declaration? Make a declaration that make it clear you haven't taken advantage, perhaps.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday August 4th 2014
Well, I suppose if you take too long, you just have to declare something that you have written down.Clive Brooker wrote:This reminds me of the "slow pass" in bridge. Etiquette demands that if you think for a conspicuously long time over an opening bid, you can't then pass. If your partner does this, you mustn't take advantage.Gavin Chipper wrote:She might have had a risky 6 or 7 that she was agonising over. She wouldn't have been able to get away with cheating here without it looking really obvious. It would have been - Long pause, "Six. Er, not written down." That would have looked pretty bad.
Back to Countdown, what should you do if you realise you've hesitated far too long over a declaration? Make a declaration that make it clear you haven't taken advantage, perhaps.