Ask Graeme?
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Ask Graeme?
lol <3 Kirk! Have there ever been any declarations where the contestant knew the word from real life?
- Grant Waters
- Acolyte
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:48 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
JackHurst wrote:Which contestant(s) with at least one wine has the highest loss:win ratio?
![Surprised :o](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
If we list all the DC guests in order of the average joint score in all 15-round heat games they appeared in, the top five are:Zarte Siempre wrote:I'm expecting this to take far too much time and effort to be worthwhile answering, but on the off-chance.
Are there lucky omens in Dictionary Corner? i.e. - does one produce the highest average scores, and does one (excluding finals week obviously) preside over more future series champions in their heats than anyone else?
Code: Select all
Tony Christie 178.60
Steve Davis 178.20
Clare Balding 174.25
Ingrid Tarrant 171.80
Jonathan Maitland 167.00
Code: Select all
Sue MacGregor 164.20
Joan Bakewell 163.80
Kathryn Apanowicz 162.80
Dr Hilary Jones 161.90
Matt Le Tissier 161.40
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
18 contestants have offered words with two phantoms. Nobody's managed more.Jack Worsley wrote:Who's used the most phantom letters in a letters round?
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
Mark Deeks wrote:Have there ever been any declarations on Countdown that would be pencils on Apterous today? So, valid as maxes, valid in ODE3 now, still unpencilled.
Anything regarding apterous pencils is a dead end I'm afraid - I don't have access to the apterous database, only the one I made from the wiki.Kirk Bevins wrote:Have there been any declarations (during 15 round Countdown) that had a) never come up on the show before and b) were pencils at the time on apterous, i.e. the contestant knew the word from life or, if an apterite, had never offered it before as a max.
- Innis Carson
- Devotee
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:24 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
There has definitely been at least one - MYOGLOBIN remains unpencilled.Mark Deeks wrote:Have there ever been any declarations on Countdown that would be pencils on Apterous today? So, valid as maxes, valid in ODE3 now, still unpencilled.
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
- Mark Deeks
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:15 am
Re: Ask Graeme?
Well fuck a duck, Michael Calder. That's a brilliant spot.Innis Carson wrote:There has definitely been at least one - MYOGLOBIN remains unpencilled.Mark Deeks wrote:Have there ever been any declarations on Countdown that would be pencils on Apterous today? So, valid as maxes, valid in ODE3 now, still unpencilled.
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Ask Graeme?
Nice one Graeme.
MYOGLOBIN is incredible! Worth remembering as BOOMINGLY^.
Surprised it's not a listed conundrum on apterous as I've heard of it through biology and there are many much more obscure words included as a conundrum online.
MYOGLOBIN is incredible! Worth remembering as BOOMINGLY^.
Surprised it's not a listed conundrum on apterous as I've heard of it through biology and there are many much more obscure words included as a conundrum online.
Re: Ask Graeme?
If we had a graph, consisting of all contestants joined to other contestants they had played, what would be the largest connected bit of the graph? Which player in that part has the least degrees of separation from any other player? Finally, how many degrees of separation am I away from that player?
Finally finally, can you answer this question again after the championship has finished?
Thanks <3
Finally finally, can you answer this question again after the championship has finished?
Thanks <3
- Innis Carson
- Devotee
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:24 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
There was a discussion about this a while back, and it seems to be the case that all contestants are linked in this way, apart from a small isolated group in Series 53. So that answers the first part of the question at least, would be interesting to know the answer to the other part.JackHurst wrote:If we had a graph, consisting of all contestants joined to other contestants they had played, what would be the largest connected bit of the graph? Which player in that part has the least degrees of separation from any other player? Finally, how many degrees of separation am I away from that player?
Finally finally, can you answer this question again after the championship has finished?
Thanks <3
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:03 am
Re: Ask Graeme?
Measured by (number of maxed rounds/number of rounds played), which was the best series in Countdown history?
- Ben Wilson
- Legend
- Posts: 4549
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
- Location: North Hykeham
Re: Ask Graeme?
I'm guessing that 68 & 33 should perhaps be disregarded for this question.Nick Deller wrote:Measured by (number of maxed rounds/number of rounds played), which was the best series in Countdown history?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:03 am
Re: Ask Graeme?
Fair point, though 68 isn't in the Graemebase anyway. Not sure what to do about series which started with a CoC, also.Ben Wilson wrote:I'm guessing that 68 & 33 should perhaps be disregarded for this question.Nick Deller wrote:Measured by (number of maxed rounds/number of rounds played), which was the best series in Countdown history?
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Ask Graeme?
For a curio, include these series and see how they compare with regular ones.Ben Wilson wrote:I'm guessing that 68 & 33 should perhaps be disregarded for this question.Nick Deller wrote:Measured by (number of maxed rounds/number of rounds played), which was the best series in Countdown history?
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13333
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
Yes. Good question.Nick Deller wrote:Measured by (number of maxed rounds/number of rounds played), which was the best series in Countdown history?
For series with CofCs, specials etc. I think it would be best to disreagard the CofC games. They're not really part of the series after all, but just categorised like that. They could even be given their own separate rating like series 33.
-
- Series 78 Champion
- Posts: 1344
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 8:56 pm
- Location: Dadford, Buckinghamshire
Re: Ask Graeme?
After the great answer to my last question:
How many people have won a game, after missing a 9 that their opponent didn't miss?
How many people have won a game, after missing a 9 that their opponent didn't miss?
Possibly the first contestant to accelerate with a mic clipped...
Re: Ask Graeme?
I remember Paul Howe doing this in his heats, the lady he was against got DESPERADO in round 1. You've gotta be thinking your time's up when that happens.Zarte Siempre wrote:After the great answer to my last question:
How many people have won a game, after missing a 9 that their opponent didn't miss?
Last edited by Jon Corby on Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Ask Graeme?
Which contestant was the most successful after declaring an invalid word in round one of their first game?
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Ask Graeme?
Stewart Holden with UNMAILED. Although he did manage to pull it back in round 2 with a 9er...Andy Platt wrote:Which contestant was the most successful after declaring an invalid word in round one of their first game?
Cheers Graeme
- Mark Deeks
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:15 am
Re: Ask Graeme?
Me. Incidentally, that round would also answer my previous question - DISPERSER is unpencilled.Zarte Siempre wrote:After the great answer to my last question:
How many people have won a game, after missing a 9 that their opponent didn't miss?
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
- Grant Waters
- Acolyte
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:48 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
Well I'm not in Stewart Holden's league but my first declaration was mascule. It's valid in Latin as it happens but I was probably getting mixed up with MACULES.Andy Platt wrote:Which contestant was the most successful after declaring an invalid word in round one of their first game?
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
I've counted letters and numbers rounds as two maxable rounds, so if both players maxed it that counts as 2 out of 2. For conundrums I've only counted them once - they're either 0/1 or 1/1. As expected, the top of this table is dominated by CoCs. The highest ordinary series is series 29, in which 43.92% of offerings were maxes.Ben Wilson wrote:I'm guessing that 68 & 33 should perhaps be disregarded for this question.Nick Deller wrote:Measured by (number of maxed rounds/number of rounds played), which was the best series in Countdown history?
Top 20:
Code: Select all
Championship of Champions XII 66.90
Championship of Champions XI 58.39
Championship of Champions IV 57.36
Championship of Champions XIII 57.24
Championship of Champions V 57.03
Championship of Champions VI 57.03
Championship of Champions VII 54.69
Series 33 (Supreme Championship) 53.83
Championship of Champions III 53.15
Championship of Champions I 52.94
Masters Series 1 50.59
Championship of Champions IX 49.06
Masters Series 2 47.74
Special episodes 47.00
Championship of Champions VIII 45.31
Junior Championship 45.10
Series 29 43.92
Series 27 43.36
Series 63 42.91
Series 31 42.88
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:03 am
Re: Ask Graeme?
Ooh that's interesting, thank you! 29, 27 and 31 all in the top four regular series suggests 1993-1995 as an unsuspected and surprising golden era for the show, and I can't really remember why that would be the case.
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3969
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Ask Graeme?
That's when I most enjoyed watching. Isn't that the time of the likes of Saldahna?Nick Deller wrote:Ooh that's interesting, thank you! 29, 27 and 31 all in the top four regular series suggests 1993-1995 as an unsuspected and surprising golden era for the show, and I can't really remember why that would be the case.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:03 am
Re: Ask Graeme?
It's a little bit after Saldanha's time. The winners of those series were Darren Shacklady, David Elias and David Acton respectively though, so definitely three quality players.Ian Volante wrote:That's when I most enjoyed watching. Isn't that the time of the likes of Saldahna?Nick Deller wrote:Ooh that's interesting, thank you! 29, 27 and 31 all in the top four regular series suggests 1993-1995 as an unsuspected and surprising golden era for the show, and I can't really remember why that would be the case.
It's also my own general era.
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Re: Ask Graeme?
What is the longest undefeated streak in countdown.. i know jack hurst is on 14 at this time and just wondering who and what is the best undefeated streak??
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Ask Graeme?
If you discount the Master Series, which a lot of people do, then it's Harvey Freeman, who never lost a match on the show, and he played 19 of themLee Kelly wrote:What is the longest undefeated streak in countdown.. i know jack hurst is on 14 at this time and just wondering who and what is the best undefeated streak??
![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
His only loss was to Mark Nyman in the Masters, when Nyman got the final conundrum (according to Mike Brown) on ZERO seconds
![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
But for genuine unbeatenness, if that won't do, ask Graeme.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13333
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
How many rounds have all of the octochamps scored points in out of the 120 or 72? Basically everything I asked about the maxes but changed to just whether they scored anything in the round.
Also, instead of maxes, how would everyone have scored with the following system - with letters, 1 point for a max, 1/2 for one off the max, 1/4 for two off the max (halving each time), regardless of whether their opponent beat them. For conundrums, just 1 point if they got it and nothing otherwise. For numbers, 1 for a max, 1/2 for one off, 1/3 for two off, 1/4 for three off (denominator goes up by 1 each time). Obviously they can't score if their opponent beat them because no valid method is verified. It seems intuitively right to have the drop-off less in the numbers than the letters. So as above, all the same information as with the max stats - thanks in advance!!!
Also, instead of maxes, how would everyone have scored with the following system - with letters, 1 point for a max, 1/2 for one off the max, 1/4 for two off the max (halving each time), regardless of whether their opponent beat them. For conundrums, just 1 point if they got it and nothing otherwise. For numbers, 1 for a max, 1/2 for one off, 1/3 for two off, 1/4 for three off (denominator goes up by 1 each time). Obviously they can't score if their opponent beat them because no valid method is verified. It seems intuitively right to have the drop-off less in the numbers than the letters. So as above, all the same information as with the max stats - thanks in advance!!!
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Ask Graeme?
Gevin Scoring v0.5
- Clive Brooker
- Devotee
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 pm
- Location: San Toy
Re: Ask Graeme?
Can you give Gevin access to the database please?Gavin Chipper wrote:Also, instead of maxes, how would everyone have scored with the following system - with letters, 1 point for a max, 1/2 for one off the max, 1/4 for two off the max (halving each time), regardless of whether their opponent beat them. For conundrums, just 1 point if they got it and nothing otherwise. For numbers, 1 for a max, 1/2 for one off, 1/3 for two off, 1/4 for three off (denominator goes up by 1 each time). Obviously they can't score if their opponent beat them because no valid method is verified. It seems intuitively right to have the drop-off less in the numbers than the letters. So as above, all the same information as with the max stats - thanks in advance!!!
If you're going to start crediting players (or groupings of players) for what they did whether they scored in a round or not, you may be unfairly penalising them for trying to match their opponent with a word they know is probably invalid, which it could be argued shows better awareness and stronger gameplay.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13333
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
No system is perfect, and you'll be able to find scenarios like that in all of them. I don't think your scenario would happen too often anyway. If you're looking at maxes or points scored, for example, then people will lose out from playing safe when their opponent has declared first so they know they will score anyway.Clive Brooker wrote:Can you give Gevin access to the database please?Gavin Chipper wrote:Also, instead of maxes, how would everyone have scored with the following system - with letters, 1 point for a max, 1/2 for one off the max, 1/4 for two off the max (halving each time), regardless of whether their opponent beat them. For conundrums, just 1 point if they got it and nothing otherwise. For numbers, 1 for a max, 1/2 for one off, 1/3 for two off, 1/4 for three off (denominator goes up by 1 each time). Obviously they can't score if their opponent beat them because no valid method is verified. It seems intuitively right to have the drop-off less in the numbers than the letters. So as above, all the same information as with the max stats - thanks in advance!!!
If you're going to start crediting players (or groupings of players) for what they did whether they scored in a round or not, you may be unfairly penalising them for trying to match their opponent with a word they know is probably invalid, which it could be argued shows better awareness and stronger gameplay.
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1763
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Ask Graeme?
Graeme, what is the average maximum available for a letters round and for a numbers round? Just wondering how much difference on average the proposed format change will make (I'm guessing about 2-3 points).
Mike Brown: "Round 12: T N R S A E I G U
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4552
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Ask Graeme?
Some sort of distribution around the average would also be quite useful.Adam Gillard wrote:Graeme, what is the average maximum available for a letters round and for a numbers round? Just wondering how much difference on average the proposed format change will make (I'm guessing about 2-3 points).
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Ask Graeme?
On this subject, it would be pretty sweet to see series-by-series breakdowns, to see if an apto-effect can be identified.Jon O'Neill wrote:Some sort of distribution around the average would also be quite useful.Adam Gillard wrote:Graeme, what is the average maximum available for a letters round and for a numbers round? Just wondering how much difference on average the proposed format change will make (I'm guessing about 2-3 points).
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
Average maximum points available is 7.7783 for letters, 9.8723 for numbers. However, some of the maxes for earlier games might be wrong as they use the ODE2r rather than the COD. If we just look at 15 rounders, the average maximum in a letters round is 7.9277. If we look only at 15 rounders since the start of 2011 (the introduction of the ODE3) it's 7.8368.Adam Gillard wrote:Graeme, what is the average maximum available for a letters round and for a numbers round? Just wondering how much difference on average the proposed format change will make (I'm guessing about 2-3 points).
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Ask Graeme?
Oh yeah, just realized my query doesn't make sense given that I thought we were talking about declarations, rather than maxes. If we could have stats on declarations over the past few series that would be fun (and arguably more indicative of what sort of change the new format would have on scores).
- Johnny Canuck
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:44 pm
- Location: Montréal 😃, Québec 😕, Canada 😃
Re: Ask Graeme?
If Jon O'Neill's 122 is the highest score without a nine, what is the highest without a nine or an eight (no words of more than 7 letters)? What is the highest without a nine, eight or seven (has this ever happened at all)? Also, what is the shortest longest word length ever offered by a contestant in a game?
Thanks to Gavin Chipper for having inspired this question. Apologies if you're too busy with other questions right now.
Thanks to Gavin Chipper for having inspired this question. Apologies if you're too busy with other questions right now.
I'm not dead yet. In a rut right now because of stress from work. I'll be back later in S89. I also plan to bring back the Mastergram - if I can find a way to run a timer or clock through pure MediaWiki without having to upload to Vimeo every time.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:50 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
Surely a three letter word is the smallest offered ever? But then again, I'm sure I've seen someone just give up and offer nothing; when probably there was a two or a three letter word there?
Re: Ask Graeme?
For a given player's offerings during a game (e.g. 7,7,7,6,5,8,8,6,7,8,7) we take the maximum value. (So the max length of a word offered during the show). In that example, it's 8. He's wondering which player had the smallest maximum value in a game.Dave Preece wrote:Surely a three letter word is the smallest offered ever? But then again, I'm sure I've seen someone just give up and offer nothing; when probably there was a two or a three letter word there?
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:50 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
Arrr, right, I see - sorry - new to all this.Conor wrote:For a given player's offerings during a game (e.g. 7,7,7,6,5,8,8,6,7,8,7) we take the maximum value. (So the max length of a word offered during the show). In that example, it's 8. He's wondering which player had the smallest maximum value in a game.Dave Preece wrote:Surely a three letter word is the smallest offered ever? But then again, I'm sure I've seen someone just give up and offer nothing; when probably there was a two or a three letter word there?
Q. What is the shortest word declared in any round, I've seen a three, surely no one has ever declared a two?
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Ask Graeme?
Yeah, no-one has gone lower than 3 in terms of declaration or winning points.Dave Preece wrote:Q. What is the shortest word declared in any round, I've seen a three, surely no one has ever declared a two?
![Geek :geek:](./images/smilies/icon_e_geek.gif)
Re: Ask Graeme?
Here's a question that's come to mind...
Have the words COUNTDOWN or CONUNDRUM ever popped up in a game (either during the letters or as the conundrum)?
Have the words COUNTDOWN or CONUNDRUM ever popped up in a game (either during the letters or as the conundrum)?
- Johnny Canuck
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:44 pm
- Location: Montréal 😃, Québec 😕, Canada 😃
Re: Ask Graeme?
I happen to know the answer to this one, so I'll step in.
Turns out the conundrum solution for the first-ever series final was CONUNDRUM. Since the name "conundrum" for the last round is never mentioned in Episode 1 (you can see it on YouTube), that might have been when they decided to call them conundrums in the first place.
DONUTWONC = COUNTDOWN was used as a conundrum in this match from Series 46.
AFAIK, neither of these have ever come up in a letters game. However, in Round 2 here, we were one consonant/vowel pick away.
Turns out the conundrum solution for the first-ever series final was CONUNDRUM. Since the name "conundrum" for the last round is never mentioned in Episode 1 (you can see it on YouTube), that might have been when they decided to call them conundrums in the first place.
DONUTWONC = COUNTDOWN was used as a conundrum in this match from Series 46.
AFAIK, neither of these have ever come up in a letters game. However, in Round 2 here, we were one consonant/vowel pick away.
I'm not dead yet. In a rut right now because of stress from work. I'll be back later in S89. I also plan to bring back the Mastergram - if I can find a way to run a timer or clock through pure MediaWiki without having to upload to Vimeo every time.
- Thomas Carey
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:17 pm
- Location: North-West of Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Ask Graeme?
COUNTDOWN would have if Phil bloody Watkins had picked a final consonant. http://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_4145Mark Ivey wrote:Here's a question that's come to mind...
Have the words COUNTDOWN or CONUNDRUM ever popped up in a game (either during the letters or as the conundrum)?
Edit: ninja'd by Johnny.
cheers maus
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:39 am
- Location: Seated at a computer
Re: Ask Graeme?
Graeme: I'm interested in how Numbers skills have evolved over the series of Countdown, specifically with regard to the Numbers round picks that contestants have selected. I seem to recall that in the early days, when Countdown was dominated by Scrabblers, it was very rare that anyone would pick anything other than 1 or 2 large. Nowadays, the 6-small specialists, and those who have put in effort to learn 4 large tricks, have come to the fore, realising how much of an advantage it confers to go for these traditionally more difficult selections.
For each series, what percentage of Numbers games have been 1 large, 2 large, 3 large, 4 large, and 6 small?
For each series, what percentage of Numbers games have been 1 large, 2 large, 3 large, 4 large, and 6 small?
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Ask Graeme?
This.Matt Bayfield wrote:Graeme: I'm interested in how Numbers skills have evolved over the series of Countdown, specifically with regard to the Numbers round picks that contestants have selected. I seem to recall that in the early days, when Countdown was dominated by Scrabblers, it was very rare that anyone would pick anything other than 1 or 2 large. Nowadays, the 6-small specialists, and those who have put in effort to learn 4 large tricks, have come to the fore, realising how much of an advantage it confers to go for these traditionally more difficult selections.
For each series, what percentage of Numbers games have been 1 large, 2 large, 3 large, 4 large, and 6 small?
The advent of web technology etc is very significant.
Even if a contestant isn't using apterous, they can still find websites with numbers tricks etc.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Harlow
Re: Ask Graeme?
What were the selections availableJames Robinson wrote:Yeah, no-one has gone lower than 3 in terms of declaration or winning points.Dave Preece wrote:Q. What is the shortest word declared in any round, I've seen a three, surely no one has ever declared a two?
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Surprised :o](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:12 pm
- Location: Kildare, Rep. of Ireland
Re: Ask Graeme?
Most consective crucial conundrums? Most consecutive non-crucials?(I'm guessing series 63 or 64 for that one)
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
Looking over series 46 to 67, it doesn't vary much. In the following table, only valid declarations are counted, and, in the case where the opponent's word was longer, the number of points that would have been scored otherwise are counted.Michael Wallace wrote:Oh yeah, just realized my query doesn't make sense given that I thought we were talking about declarations, rather than maxes. If we could have stats on declarations over the past few series that would be fun (and arguably more indicative of what sort of change the new format would have on scores).
Code: Select all
Series Average raw letters round score
46 6.5655
47 6.6532
48 6.6655
49 6.4315
50 6.5692
51 6.6875
52 6.6582
53 6.6728
54 6.6059
55 6.5168
56 6.6033
57 6.5465
58 6.4486
59 6.4981
60 6.5070
61 6.6052
62 6.4805
63 6.6236
64 6.4590
65 6.4398
66 6.3961
67 6.5213
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
I refer the honourable gentleman to...Dave Preece wrote:Arrr, right, I see - sorry - new to all this.Conor wrote:For a given player's offerings during a game (e.g. 7,7,7,6,5,8,8,6,7,8,7) we take the maximum value. (So the max length of a word offered during the show). In that example, it's 8. He's wondering which player had the smallest maximum value in a game.Dave Preece wrote:Surely a three letter word is the smallest offered ever? But then again, I'm sure I've seen someone just give up and offer nothing; when probably there was a two or a three letter word there?
Q. What is the shortest word declared in any round, I've seen a three, surely no one has ever declared a two?
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1763
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Ask Graeme?
Thank you!Graeme Cole wrote:Average maximum points available is 7.7783 for letters, 9.8723 for numbers. However, some of the maxes for earlier games might be wrong as they use the ODE2r rather than the COD. If we just look at 15 rounders, the average maximum in a letters round is 7.9277. If we look only at 15 rounders since the start of 2011 (the introduction of the ODE3) it's 7.8368.Adam Gillard wrote:Graeme, what is the average maximum available for a letters round and for a numbers round? Just wondering how much difference on average the proposed format change will make (I'm guessing about 2-3 points).
Mike Brown: "Round 12: T N R S A E I G U
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13333
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
What is the average score that an octochamp gets in the letters and the numbers rounds?
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
Okay. Who are you, and what have you done with Matt?Matt Bayfield wrote:Graeme: I'm interested in how Numbers skills have evolved over the series of Countdown
According to the database, the show was nearly seven years old before anyone thought to pick 4 large. The caveat to this is that series 1 and 2 have hardly any round details associated with them, so we can't say for certain that it didn't happen then.Matt Bayfield wrote:specifically with regard to the Numbers round picks that contestants have selected. I seem to recall that in the early days, when Countdown was dominated by Scrabblers, it was very rare that anyone would pick anything other than 1 or 2 large. Nowadays, the 6-small specialists, and those who have put in effort to learn 4 large tricks, have come to the fore, realising how much of an advantage it confers to go for these traditionally more difficult selections.
For each series, what percentage of Numbers games have been 1 large, 2 large, 3 large, 4 large, and 6 small?
Graph is as follows, but take series 1 and 2 with a pinch of salt. Only series games are included, not CoCs and specials and so on. The Supreme Championship (series 33) is included, but perhaps surprisingly the numbers picks don't seem to be much different from other series around that time. As expected, the favourite pick is 1 large, and in the very early days it was almost unheard of for anyone to pick anything other than 1 or 2 large. 6 small went through a period of being intermittently more popular than 2 large in the 1990s, but 2 large seems to have made a comeback more recently.
Also, I've not included series 67 because complete details aren't in the database. I do now have all of series 67 in machine-readable form (thanks Clive), I just haven't got round to working it into my database yet.
![Image](http://greem.co.uk/countdown/stats/num_pick_freq.png)
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4552
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Ask Graeme?
Awesome. Great question. Great answer.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Ask Graeme?
Neat, thanks. Any chance you could run the same but only include the finalists?Graeme Cole wrote:Looking over series 46 to 67, it doesn't vary much. In the following table, only valid declarations are counted, and, in the case where the opponent's word was longer, the number of points that would have been scored otherwise are counted.Michael Wallace wrote:Oh yeah, just realized my query doesn't make sense given that I thought we were talking about declarations, rather than maxes. If we could have stats on declarations over the past few series that would be fun (and arguably more indicative of what sort of change the new format would have on scores).
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
The most consecutive games where the conundrum was not crucial was 26, which were the 26 games up to and including this game in series 63, and which included the heat games of Eoin Monaghan, Daniel Pati, Tom Rowell and Peter Godwin. The special between Charlie Reams and Junaid Mubeen provided the crucial before this 26-game drought. If you exclude all specials, this run of non-crucials would have been 33 games long: between here and here.Liam Tiernan wrote:Most consective crucial conundrums? Most consecutive non-crucials?(I'm guessing series 63 or 64 for that one)
The most consecutive games with crucials was 7, which happened twice: the seven games up to and including Episode 231 and the seven games up to and including Episode 1743.
- Mike Brown
- Legend
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
- Location: King's Lynn
- Contact:
Re: Ask Graeme?
Given that I missed very little of Series 1 and 2 (even though I didn't start recaps straight away), I'm pretty certain that this is the first ever occurrence, especially as I noted "MB's dream" next to it at the time (sad, I know). What was the first 4 large in a non-Masters game? (sorry if I've missed it in the veritable sea of stats!)Graeme Cole wrote: According to the database, the show was nearly seven years old before anyone thought to pick 4 large. The caveat to this is that series 1 and 2 have hardly any round details associated with them, so we can't say for certain that it didn't happen then.
Great stuff, Graeme, loving it...
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Ask Graeme?
Episode 954 was the first in a non-Masters game.Mike Brown wrote:Given that I missed very little of Series 1 and 2 (even though I didn't start recaps straight away), I'm pretty certain that this is the first ever occurrence, especially as I noted "MB's dream" next to it at the time (sad, I know). What was the first 4 large in a non-Masters game? (sorry if I've missed it in the veritable sea of stats!)Graeme Cole wrote: According to the database, the show was nearly seven years old before anyone thought to pick 4 large. The caveat to this is that series 1 and 2 have hardly any round details associated with them, so we can't say for certain that it didn't happen then.
Great stuff, Graeme, loving it...