Jeff Stelling is to RESIGN from Countdown at the end of Series 65.




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ds-newsxml
Jeff Clayton's last name isn't Stelling.Charlie Reams wrote:Phew, for one moment I thought Jeff Clayton had quit Countdown! Luckily it's only Jeff Stelling.
I agree Ken would be a good host, but broadcasting his radio show from Manchester for one (or at most two) days a year when he's in DC is a very different proposition from the 45 days a year he'd need to accommodate Countdown into his schedule. I'm absolutely positive this is a non-starter.Ross Allatt wrote:From that list above I think Ken Bruce is a great shout. He's got plenty experience of the show as a guest in DC, he's an experienced live broadcaster with a comforting persona/voice. He's smart and very quick witted. Not sure if he has much/any telly experience but he'd have no problems balancing his radio show with Countdown (broadcasts from Manchester on the days he's appearing in DC).
lolAdam Gillard wrote:If the next presenter is someone of average height and build, they might have to cut 5 minutes off the transmission.
Although I pretty much think you're right about this, it might not be completely out of the question. Mark & Lard did their Radio 1 show from Manchester full-time for many years and were very rarely alongside the rest of the DJs in London.Phil Reynolds wrote:I agree Ken would be a good host, but broadcasting his radio show from Manchester for one (or at most two) days a year when he's in DC is a very different proposition from the 45 days a year he'd need to accommodate Countdown into his schedule. I'm absolutely positive this is a non-starter.
He lives in Oxfordshire with a large family. Not likely to uproot them.JimBentley wrote:Although I pretty much think you're right about this, it might not be completely out of the question. Mark & Lard did their Radio 1 show from Manchester full-time for many years and were very rarely alongside the rest of the DJs in London.Phil Reynolds wrote:I agree Ken would be a good host, but broadcasting his radio show from Manchester for one (or at most two) days a year when he's in DC is a very different proposition from the 45 days a year he'd need to accommodate Countdown into his schedule. I'm absolutely positive this is a non-starter.
No, not again. He's only quitting once - the same event has been reported several times.
Sloblock, surely.Michael Wallace wrote:Looking down the list it's clearly just a load of bollocks (Stephen Fry at 17? Really?)
With many it's a matter of taste. As far as Eamonn Holmes concerned he's just an arsehole, so I wouldn't imagine they'd let him do it.Nicholas Randall wrote:Here is a list of replacements:
Aled Jones
Alexander Armstrong
Eamonn Holmes
Gordon Burns
Paul Merton
Rory Bremner
Out of these I would probably go for Alexander Armstrong but I don't think he will do it as he turned down the role before and he now presents Pointless which is in an early evening slot. Aled Jones would be my second choice. He does do presenting with Songs Of Praise and Escape To The Country but Countdown is a totally different programme. I don't think Eamonn Holmes will do it as he presents Sky's breakfast programme but he has been linked to presenting Countdown before. I have seen Gordon Burns's name been linked on the internet this morning as he is leaving North West Tonight in September and obviously works in Manchester so he could be the man to take over. Paul Merton has been linked before but would not be my own personal choice and again Rory Bremner has been linked before but he would not be my personal choice either.
I have been reading on a newspaper website that viewing figures are down to 600,000. I wonder if Channel 4 will let Coundown continue or will they finish it?
Nicholas
Your enjoyment doesn't make me sad at all.Tracey Lilly wrote:Very sad news - i have enjoyed the rapport between him and Rachel
That's no way to talk about Tracey.Gavin Chipper wrote:I don't mind doing it.
Yes it is.Matt Morrison wrote:That's no way to talk about Tracey.Gavin Chipper wrote:I don't mind doing it.
Ah. Oh well. Whatever. He's weird anyway!! Why, you say? Well, I'll tell you why!...when I've thought about it.........But still, its not really such a big deal - firstly, it's just gossip, not nessacerily true. Secondly, the people who decide who to present Countdown won't just let someone like Mr Bean present it will they?!?!?!! Although it would be incredibly funny if it was the mr bean version of countdown - just imagine it; way more fun!!James Robinson wrote:Jeff Stelling is to RESIGN from Countdown at the end of Series 65.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Erm, you've thought about it, Sophie. CLEARLY NOT!!!Soph K wrote:when I've thought about it.........But still, its not really such a big deal - firstly, it's just gossip, not nessacerily true.James Robinson wrote:Jeff Stelling is to RESIGN from Countdown at the end of Series 65.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
oh whatever!!!! anyway why do you like jeff so much?? hes just...jeff!James Robinson wrote:Erm, you've thought about it, Sophie. CLEARLY NOT!!!Soph K wrote:when I've thought about it.........But still, its not really such a big deal - firstly, it's just gossip, not nessacerily true.James Robinson wrote:Jeff Stelling is to RESIGN from Countdown at the end of Series 65.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And it's nowhere near gossip if Jeff himself says it to be true.....
I genuinely can't decide if 2) or 3) is better.Soph K wrote:1) His jokes are always groaned at - we need someone who tells better jokes anyway!
2) His name is boring. It should be something like Kyle Lococla...much more fun to say!
3) He is boring - he just says "Start the clock"; it would be better to say, "I demand that the cool countdown clock starts to go tick tock!" (Woah i didnt actually mean that to rhyme...that phrase should be in a hollywood star poet's poem!)
4) At the end of countdown, Rachel should share some secretive fashion secret top tips for soon-to-be top model girls, especially for girls whose second name begins with K. Guess who??!
SO I THINK YOU'LL FIND THAT JEFF STELLING IS WEIRD!
**smiles**Michael Wallace wrote:I genuinely can't decide if 2) or 3) is better.Soph K wrote:1) His jokes are always groaned at - we need someone who tells better jokes anyway!
2) His name is boring. It should be something like Kyle Lococla...much more fun to say!
3) He is boring - he just says "Start the clock"; it would be better to say, "I demand that the cool countdown clock starts to go tick tock!" (Woah i didnt actually mean that to rhyme...that phrase should be in a hollywood star poet's poem!)
4) At the end of countdown, Rachel should share some secretive fashion secret top tips for soon-to-be top model girls, especially for girls whose second name begins with K. Guess who??!
SO I THINK YOU'LL FIND THAT JEFF STELLING IS WEIRD!
I love Bill Turnbull. I wake up with him most mornings.Gavin Chipper wrote:Why have people mentioned Bill Turnbull? I only know him as some non-entity on the BBC breakfast programme. Does he have any other claim to fame?
I have to say I don't really pay that much attention to breakfast when I have it on but I can sort of see how he is a bit similar to Jeff Stelling. But I've always considered Bill and Charlie Stayt to be interchangeable.Martin Bishop wrote:Bill Turnbull is very good on Breakfast. He's not dissimilar to Jeff stelling in some ways. He would do a good job on Countdown, but he's clearly far too busy.
Substitute "Sky Sports" for "the BBC breakfast programme" and that was exactly the reaction of most Countdown viewers to the announcement that Jeff Stelling was taking over.Gavin Chipper wrote:Why have people mentioned Bill Turnbull? I only know him as some non-entity on the BBC breakfast programme. Does he have any other claim to fame?
Mark James wrote:Personally I hope who ever ends up doing it ensures the show flops and that Rachel has to resort to doing porn.
I think it's...Mark James wrote:What does everyone think of this idea?
oh I see. Yes, this is a good idea. An amazing one. It'd be awesome to watch, if just for a series, not that I could ever see it happening.Mark James wrote:Instead of having the guest in dictionary corner have a different guest host every week a la Have I Got News For You.
I'd thought about this, but it doesn't really make sense to me. It works on HIGNFY because the presenter is basically part of the entertainment, whereas on Countdown the presenter is primarily there just to be a bit of lubricant between rounds. It would seem really weird to have a different host every week when most of what they have to say is "let's start the clock" and "anything else from dictionary corner?".Matt Morrison wrote:Mark James wrote:Personally I hope who ever ends up doing it ensures the show flops and that Rachel has to resort to doing porn.I think it's...Mark James wrote:What does everyone think of this idea?
oh I see. Yes, this is a good idea. An amazing one. It'd be awesome to watch, if just for a series, not that I could ever see it happening.Mark James wrote:Instead of having the guest in dictionary corner have a different guest host every week a la Have I Got News For You.
I imagine it'd be a nightmare to organise, but you'd also think it would be a surefire way to reinject some interest in the programme.
True, hadn't thought of that. The format would have to change - the presenter would be DC at the same time. This would be quite different to the current setup (both physically and, er, programmatically?!) but would work I reckon. Plus killing two celebrities with one seat ought to make the whole thing more achievable in terms of booking availability and booking costs.Michael Wallace wrote:I'd thought about this, but it doesn't really make sense to me. It works on HIGNFY because the presenter is basically part of the entertainment, whereas on Countdown the presenter is primarily there just to be a bit of lubricant between rounds. It would seem really weird to have a different host every week when most of what they have to say is "let's start the clock" and "anything else from dictionary corner?".Matt Morrison wrote:oh I see. Yes, this is a good idea. An amazing one. It'd be awesome to watch, if just for a series, not that I could ever see it happening.Mark James wrote:Instead of having the guest in dictionary corner have a different guest host every week a la Have I Got News For You.
I imagine it'd be a nightmare to organise, but you'd also think it would be a surefire way to reinject some interest in the programme.
lol.Ryan Taylor wrote:I love Bill Turnbull. I wake up with him most mornings.
Can't say I'm keen. I think it would probably be O.K. for Specials, but otherwise I can't see it working very well. For me, there's probably only a few of the guests I'd like to see in the host's chair and I suspect it would also be a pain in the fundament for the production team. After all, the host does glue the show together and, unlike HIGNFY, it's not just a case of reading an autocue - and that show also takes ages to record, as you're no doubt all aware.Mark James wrote:What does everyone think of this idea? Instead of having the guest in dictionary corner have a different guest host every week a la Have I Got News For You.