c4countdown

John Garcia

Sophie Ellis-Bexter's mum (Janet Ellis?) has been on Blue Peter? If it's that, I wouldn't have got it from most of the clues. But it's not really early 80s specifically anyway so probably not that. Am I in the right ballpark? Blue Peter does sound like a good baddie though. Correct! Janet Ellis. No...

John Garcia

Gevin Chapwell wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2026 5:10 pm Don't know!

Final clue: It's a puzzle

Bonus clue: The TV presenters daughter is a famous pop singer who herself has been a DC guest (more times than her mum who has only been on 1 week).

John Garcia

R3: I thought (50+8) x 4 = 232 and then 100/(75-25) for the 2 to add on was an easier solution
R5: SHALIEST for 8

John Garcia

Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2026 1:04 pm Yeah, maybe a 4th...

4. You'll find this in a workshop

If that's still not enough, the Horror film the baddie is from is a franchise (quite a famous one).

John Garcia

It won't let me edit old posts so just to reiterate:

1. Kids TV show from the early 1980's (presenter of which has been a DC guest)
2. Horror film baddie
3. Clothes shop / brand

John Garcia

Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 10:31 pm Is there a third clue?

Have updated clue 1 to be early 80's. Also clue 3

3. Clothes shop / brand

I can give a 4th if it's still too cryptic.

John Garcia

P.s. that was a fun game Colin invented today. I came up with a similar game, this time a word not a person:
1. Kids TV show from the 1980's.
2. Horror film baddie

John Garcia

R5 - DESOLATED for 9

John Garcia

Luke becomes the 4th octochamp of the series and it's still only February. 0 points from the last 2 rounds means 913 instead of potentially 933 but he's still number 1 seed. To see him miss today's conundrum was a surprise. I almost get the impression he would do better if he just treated it like a...

John Garcia

This “restaurant rule” is rubbish. Scrap it. Agree 100%. The issue isn't whether you could feasibly use a word in a particular way in real life, but whether it is specified in the dictionary. It doesn't make sense to have a single rule overriding the dictionary for one type of noun (foods), but not...

John Garcia

I didn't get it, but HATORADE was in round 12. Also that final numbers that Rachel got late by doing 473 + 100 = 573, I got two completely different (and I would argue much more straightforward) ways in the time: 100*(4+1)+9*7+10 = 573 (100+9*10+1)*(7-4) = 573 Her way was (9*4+7)*(10+1)+100 = 573. ...

John Garcia

Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Mon Feb 16, 2026 5:09 pm Probably shouldn't put spoilers for later episodes without hiding it in some way. But I'm taking the points anyway.

Oops. Have amended. That's the closest I could get for hiding, unless someone has a better way?

John Garcia

Anybody got an explanation for posset, possetted, possetting and cosset, cosseted, cosseting? No, I thought not. Wanna hear something funny? [Spoiler info for Monday 16th Feb] On Monday's episode possets came up, and Susie mentioned the word possetting in the explanation, only the sub-titler spelt ...

John Garcia

I quite liked the content warning. Was waiting for Susie Dent to explode into an expletive-laden rant, which sadly never materialised. Maybe one day.

John Garcia

How did they not spot that Henry is a P.E. teacher? Today's episode came with a "Danger Guidance" warning on 4od. I think I know why: R1: AMNIOTES as an alt 8 R2: PEAKIER for 7 R4: URCHINS for 7 R12: SPOILAGE as an alt 8, but the dict suggests PILOTAGES for 9 would be valid, as it's listed...

John Garcia

R13: MARINATE for an 8 seemed fairly obvious
3rd Numbers I did (9+7)x3=48; 48-10=38; (38x10)+1=381

John Garcia

R2 - GALIPOT as an alt 7
R10 - DUNGAREES as an alt 9 to UNGREASED

John Garcia

After talks of The Traitors possibly peaking out in 2026 in the same way as Big Brother, The X Factor and The Apprentice did in 2004, 2010 and 2012 respectively according to popular opinion Is this the same popular opinion that voted for Brexit? :D I would argue that Big Brother peaked in 2000. The...

John Garcia

2nd Numbers: 9 - 2 = 7; then 7 x 7 x 7 + 5 = 348 was a much more elegant solution IMHO.
I'm a simple man. I see a cube, I use a cube.

John Garcia

That first numbers could be done more easily with 75×8-7+100/25 = 597. That's the way I did it too. p.s. anyone else notice the backhander Rachel gave Megel when he chose 4 large in the 1st numbers: "Your favourite that you've prepared for, and we've seen evidence of that now" :D :) ;)

John Garcia

Countdown presenter Rachel Riley was left "in genuine fear for her personal safety" after receiving death threats from a former contestant who developed a menacing grudge. Laura Greenwood made it to the quarter finals of the Channel 4 game show before being sectioned, after which the conv...

John Garcia

A significant proportion of the comments on the Daily Mail article also think this is fake:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... s-job.html

John Garcia

Well I think as we discussed off forum, the fact that he solved that easier one in more time than the other harder ones pretty much shows the other ones to be not legitimate. He may have solved some of them in some amount of time, but the filming would have been afterwards and a "reconstructio...

John Garcia

Well done to Jase, not just for winning, but for keeping his shirt tucked in at the end!
Commiseration to Brett who showed great sportsmanship throughout.
A fitting end to a superb series!

John Garcia

Game of the series IMHO. Ben was unlucky to choose the disallowed underlap instead of UNDERLIP. Had he have gone with the correct word we would have had a 116 116 tie before a crucial conundrum. That would have been the icing on the cake, but as it is, still the best game of the series. p.s. Ben say...

John Garcia

Can't be sure about legitimacy, but they look legit, and as one of the comments said, you try getting a 4 year old to learn a script and recite it that convincingly - easier to do the maths! In this instance learning a script is impressive, but way more realistic than what this kid is apparently do...

John Garcia

1st numbers:
Pretty much the usual method
(25 x 4) + 9 = 109; 109 x 9 = 981; 981 - (7x2) = 967

John Garcia

I'm predicting 1 will beat 5 and 2 will beat 3 to set up 1 v 2 in the final, where 1 will win.

John Garcia

2nd Numbers alt:
(3 x 25) - 9 - 5 = 61; (61 x 10) - 4 = 606

John Garcia

Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue Dec 09, 2025 4:45 pm Standard method for that first numbers was clearly 100×50/8-75/25=622. Positively jumped out.

Jumped out to me too. 625 is an incredibly useful product to know with 4 large.

R11: MESHUGA as an alt 7

John Garcia

4th Numbers
100 50 9 1 3 1 -> 617

50 - 3 = 47; 9+1+1 = 11; 47 x 11 = 517; 517 + 100 = 617

John Garcia

R2 - GRUNDIES for alt 8
R8 - PAKORAS for alt 7

John Garcia

I did:
(100 + 8x(10-6)) x 2 = 264.

p.s. I don't know if it's just me, but Ricky doesn't look anything like Anthony Hopkins. He is however a dead ringer for the late Menzies Campbell!

John Garcia

Is Graeme still answering questions? I have one for him (or anyone else that cares to answer). So RR was on "The Wheel" yesterday (Sat 29th Nov 2025) and she topped the leaderboard. One of her questions was: Which of these big cat species is the only one known to purr like a domestic cat? ...

John Garcia

Toby McDonald wrote: ↑Fri Nov 21, 2025 12:14 am REUNITES in R8

I had RETINUES

John Garcia

3rd Numbers
50 25 75 4 2 2 -> 544
Pretty simple once you spot the trick:
(50 / 2) * 25 = 625; 625 - 75 - 4 - 2 = 544

John Garcia

1st Numbers game (25, 100, 50, 75, 5,10 -> 364):
364 is pretty much the number of days in a year, i.e. 7 (days) x 52 (weeks)
7 = (100 + 75) / 25
52 = 50 + 10/5

John Garcia

In case you're wondering, the plural of GENUS is GENERA — not genuses as you might think. I discovered this and got null points. So there's your 'false-agram': NEGUSES. I've always wondered are 'false-agrams' actually useful, or are you better off just learning the correct word (since you are reinf...

John Garcia

I'm surprised NEGUS was a drink. I always knew it as some sort of ruler in Ethiopia . Same here. Both terms are listed as definitions [1 & 2]. But Negus the ruler is apparently capitalised. ACONITE was there as an alt 7 in R7. Anyone else think the conundrum was pretty easy? Surprised it took a...

John Garcia

Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 2:47 pm Outside the time but the 3rd numbers - ((100-2)×(6+8)+4-50)/2 = 663.

You've used the 2 twice I think?
Well out of time, but I did:
((100+6)*50 + 4)/8 = 663

R5 - ROOMIES for 7

John Garcia

opaline Pronunciation: /ˈəʊpəlʌɪn/ adjective opalescent. Example sentencesSynonyms noun 1 another term for milk-glass 1.1 translucent glass of a colour other than white. Arguably, the 1.1 definition is countable. https://premium.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/milk-glass milk-glass Pronun...

John Garcia

ESCORTING is one of those words that you wouldn’t unravel at first sight unless you’re a seasoned anagrammer. You would very easily fall for the ‘sectoring’ trap, and businesses occasionally talk about ‘business sectoring’. The permutations don’t really make you stop and think they don’t look right...

John Garcia

Well, we're all getting at least five years of hard Labour! Hard Labour? I think you mean Tory Light! I think this whole affair shows that it matters not a jot which order you select your 4 vowels and 5 consonants in (if anyone dares deviate from that ratio I'll be having words). Kinda like it matt...

John Garcia

Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 4:28 pm If she'd said "four" she would have been closer arithmetically speaking, if not conceptually so.

Yeah. There aren't enough atoms in the universe to even write out that number.

John Garcia

I thought the "obvious" way to do that 3rd numbers was 75*50/6+6*100/25 = 649. It's essentially a 25 squared method. Yeah that's the way I did it too. Not the biggest numbers faux-pas on today's show though. Colin asked "A number 1 followed by 100 zeros is known by what name?" R...

John Garcia

TIRESOME as an alt 8 in R13

John Garcia

First numbers - (25*10+10-9)*4-6 = 998 Surprised Rachel didn't get this. Fairly standard splitting the multiplication. The teatime teaser shortwave appears not to be valid, nor was it when it was the conundrum in the CoC III semi-final between Harvey Freeman and John Clarke. Not sure if it was in 2...

John Garcia

Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue Aug 05, 2025 5:16 pm Could have just done (7+4+1)×75+4×10=940 though.

That's the way I did it. Also today's conundrum was pretty straightforward I thought.

John Garcia

If ever a player deserved to be a finalist it was Angus. Great play from Brett. Seems like 4 large is gonna feature heavily in this series! Speaking of which, no 4-large tricks needed for R6.

2nd Numbers:
100 + 75 + (50/25 x 6) = 187; 187 x 5 = 935

John Garcia

It's only July but my money is on John for series champ.

John Garcia

Someone mentioned the similarity of the contestants on another thread. It's not that they look like twins, but at times it was like watching one of those old movies where they get the same actor to play two different parts. Great pair of contestants and a great final! Good choice of conundrum too - ...

John Garcia

4th Numbers. A bit of a toughie to spot:

100/25 = 4; 4 + 3 = 7; 50 - 1 = 49; 49 x 7 = 343; 343 + 75 = 418

John Garcia

Yeah great game. DIRECTOR (and CREDITOR) as alt 8s to RHETORIC.

It's good to see the conundrums are gettable these finals!

John Garcia

Also R14:

> "It's got loads of factors but none of them count"

I would beg to differ!

8 + 7 + 3 = 18;
50 - 5 + 1 = 46;
18 x 46 = 828

John Garcia

BURTON as in gone for a burton. Doesn't really help! According to Wikipedia, it means to be missing or to die Still not sure I fully understand it's usage but, from Oxford Dictionaries go for a burton Informal British English Meet with disaster; be ruined, destroyed, or killed: `his boat would cut ...

John Garcia

1st numbers (easy to miss this one)
75 - 25 + 7 - 5 = 52; 10 + 8 = 18; 18 x 52 = 936; 936 - 10 = 926

3rd numbers (a lot easier - got this straight away)
(4 + 4) x (75 + 10) = 680; 50 / 25 = 2; 680 + 2 = 682

John Garcia

R8 - I declared OVERCASTS and totally would have declared it in live play too. 1st numbers 733 - there was a 7 there, obvious thing was to look for 100. Oh look there is a 5 and a 5, oh and look there is a 4. Now we need to get closer so we add 6 to 100 and get 742. Oh look there is a 9 there. Take ...

John Garcia

I thought the better man won on the day, but Anthony can hold his head up high. Hope they don't make him wait 10 years before he is allowed to re-apply. Felt like a final in all but name.

John Garcia

R4 - DISUSED as alt 7
R11 - GAROTTING for 9

John Garcia

In hindsight it clearly wasn't fudging, but whilst watching it I (wrongly) thought the challenger was fudging. The point is the viewer, opponent and Colin have no idea whether the person is fudging or not, so I think this was good refereeing. I also thought the discussion afterwards made clear that ...

Search found 404 matches