Page 1 of 1
Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:59 pm
by Jordan F
We have a new champion in Ritch Greenwood, our first non-apterite champion since Peter Etherington, and only the second in over 2 months. Can Ritch get another?
Join James for the recap later.
Re: Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 2:11 pm
by szodiac
Just seen an ad for Horse Racing for tomorrow, so checked the TV guide. A reminder its 3.30pm Countdown tomorrow !
Mauro
Re: Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 2:23 pm
by Peter Mabey
Alt 1st numbers: (10-4)x(8+5)x(9+2)
Re: Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 2:24 pm
by Tony Atkins
Unusual for them not to point out an invalid word as I am sure Andy say "manners" for 6 in R2.
Alt 1st numbers ((2x4)+9)x5x10+8
Re: Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 2:26 pm
by Peter Mabey
He said MANORS
Re: Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 2:56 pm
by Tony Atkins
Peter Mabey wrote:He said MANORS
I didn't understand his northern accent!
Re: Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 3:00 pm
by Callum Todd
Great bit of banter with Rachel at the end.
Did anyone try to play governers?
Re: Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 3:02 pm
by Tony Atkins
Managed 976 out of time - ((6+7+1)x9)-4)x8
I assume Rachel got the last numbers okay as my picture froze?
Re: Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 3:04 pm
by Jack Worsley
Callum Todd wrote:
Did anyone try to play governers?
I somehow managed to hold back as I was convinced I'd had either the singular or plural disallowed before. For a moment I was worried I'd made a huge mistake so I was relieved to hear that it wasn't in.
2 away on 3rd numbers: ((7+6)x9+4+1)x8 = 976
Re: Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 3:39 pm
by John Garcia
Tony Atkins wrote:Managed 976 out of time - ((6+7+1)x9)-4)x8
I assume Rachel got the last numbers okay as my picture froze?
Yeah she managed it ok.
For the 3rd numbers I did:
(6x8)+1=49; 4+7+9=20; 49*20=980
to get 2 away from 978 in the other direction.
For the 4th numbers Rachel did:
75+2=77; 7+6=13; 77*13=1001; 7-3=4; 1001-4=997
Re: Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 4:34 pm
by Tony Atkins
John Garcia wrote:For the 4th numbers Rachel did:
75+2=77; 7+6=13; 77*13=1001; 7-3=4; 1001-4=997
Thanks - that was my method too.
Re: Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:58 pm
by Jon Corby
Tony Atkins wrote:Peter Mabey wrote:He said MANORS
I didn't understand his northern accent!
It sounds the same, it's just that he declared it as a six (I had to rewind as I was only half-watching and thought the same as you!)
Re: Spoilers for Thursday September 26th 2013 (S69 P57)
Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:13 pm
by Philip Wilson
Callum Todd wrote:Great bit of banter with Rachel at the end.
Did anyone try to play governers?
Sorry I'm a bit late - been away and catching up. I thought it was spelt with a 2nd 'o' too but may have declared a 9 if I was going 2nd in case you can have it with an 'e'. Saw the 9 in the following round though
