Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim 54)

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:28 pm
by Jordan F
Rose Boyle is on the verge of having a clean sweep of the week. Can she end the week on her 5th win? Sad to see Dr. Phil go as well, always one of my favorite guests.

Join Thomas for the recap later.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:22 pm
by Jordan F
Couldn't Rose have put an R at the end of her GREASE for GREASER? I always thought that was in.

Is PALETTE a valid spelling of the word?

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:45 pm
by szodiac
Second numbers game different (simpler) solution: (((9+9) x 8) + 1)

Mauro

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:28 pm
by szodiac
Round two: I thought Star Trek! I thought Ferengi and lo and behold FERINGHIS. Definitely not Scrabble word :shock:

Round four: like with GREASE + R why not PRESAGE + R as well ? Definitely a Scrabble word :)

Mauro

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:50 pm
by Peter McNamara
FITMENT as a beater in round 11

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:01 pm
by Tony Atkins
szodiac wrote:First numbers game different (simpler) solution: (((9+9) x 8) + 1)

Mauro
That's the second numbers game - another method ((9+8)x(9+1))-(100-75).
Alt for the first ((50-8-1)x8)-75. Both were sadly for me out of time.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:02 pm
by Tony Atkins
szodiac wrote:Round four: like with GREASE + R why not PRESAGE + R as well ? Definitely a Scrabble word :)

Mauro
PRESAGER is fine but I didn't risk it.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:13 pm
by Tony Atkins
Jordan F wrote:Couldn't Rose have put an R at the end of her GREASE for GREASER? I always thought that was in.

Is PALETTE a valid spelling of the word?
It is the only spelling, I believe, and is a beater in round 8.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:44 pm
by James Robinson
Jordan F wrote:Is PALETTE a valid spelling of the word?
My mum thought she spotted TEATOWEL, but it's not in, so I presume it's still 2 words.

Carrying on with the 1st numbers alts., I was well happy with my method, considering that I don't normally go with sky-high (of sorts) methods: ((50 - 8) x ((75 x 8) / 100)) + 1 = 253

2nd Numbers Alt.: ((100 - 75 - 8) x (9 - 1)) + 9 = 145

IMPACTS in round 3, FITMENT in round 11 and GEODIC (not quite GEODESIC) in round 12.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:44 pm
by Graeme Cole
Well played, Rose. Nice spot on the second numbers game.

Did anyone else spot the oddity during the conundrum?

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:03 pm
by Andy Platt
As I say I'm playing all these games through quiet moments at work so I'm seeing them in a different way, but I thought that 2nd nums was easy, just 18x8 + 1, ah well. I really struggled with the letters that game though (again).

What is the oddity Graeme? Apart from the fact the scramble meant it took about a quarter of a second..

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:04 pm
by Jack Worsley
Graeme Cole wrote:
Did anyone else spot the oddity during the conundrum?
Roses's buzzer sounded like a buzz, rather than a bell? I saw this the first time and have just watched it again to make sure I didn't imagine it. Strange.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:06 pm
by Graeme Cole
Andy Platt wrote:As I say I'm playing all these games through quiet moments at work so I'm seeing them in a different way, but I thought that 2nd nums was easy, just 18x8 + 1, ah well. I really struggled with the letters that game though (again).
Well, I was three away because 2 large is evil and should be exterminated.
Andy Platt wrote:What is the oddity Graeme? Apart from the fact the scramble meant it took about a quarter of a second.
Watch it again and see if anything seems different from normal. Wasn't the case on Wednesday or Tuesday, which is all the more odd.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:19 pm
by Graeme Cole
Jack Worsley wrote:
Graeme Cole wrote:
Did anyone else spot the oddity during the conundrum?
Roses's buzzer sounded like a buzz, rather than a bell? I saw this the first time and have just watched it again to make sure I didn't imagine it. Strange.
Yes, that. For some reason I replied to Andy's post without reading this one.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:35 pm
by Andy Platt
Graeme Cole wrote:
Andy Platt wrote:As I say I'm playing all these games through quiet moments at work so I'm seeing them in a different way, but I thought that 2nd nums was easy, just 18x8 + 1, ah well. I really struggled with the letters that game though (again).
Well, I was three away because 2 large is evil and should be exterminated.
As a 6 small player, I thought you'd be one of the ones to have destroyed it
Graeme Cole wrote:
Andy Platt wrote:What is the oddity Graeme? Apart from the fact the scramble meant it took about a quarter of a second.
Watch it again and see if anything seems different from normal. Wasn't the case on Wednesday or Tuesday, which is all the more odd.
Yeah but I can't get on 4OD at work or at home so short of going the pub on my own just to watch countdown I'm not sure that's gonna happen, haha

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:35 pm
by Jon O'Neill
Graeme Cole wrote:
Andy Platt wrote:As I say I'm playing all these games through quiet moments at work so I'm seeing them in a different way, but I thought that 2nd nums was easy, just 18x8 + 1, ah well. I really struggled with the letters that game though (again).
Well, I was three away because 2 large is evil and should be exterminated.
Andy Platt wrote:What is the oddity Graeme? Apart from the fact the scramble meant it took about a quarter of a second.
Watch it again and see if anything seems different from normal. Wasn't the case on Wednesday or Tuesday, which is all the more odd.
Come on, tell us.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:36 pm
by Jon O'Neill
Graeme Cole wrote:
Jack Worsley wrote:
Graeme Cole wrote:
Did anyone else spot the oddity during the conundrum?
Roses's buzzer sounded like a buzz, rather than a bell? I saw this the first time and have just watched it again to make sure I didn't imagine it. Strange.
Yes, that. For some reason I replied to Andy's post without reading this one.
Oh wait, don't worry.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 19th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:50 pm
by Graeme Cole
Andy Platt wrote:
Graeme Cole wrote:
Andy Platt wrote:As I say I'm playing all these games through quiet moments at work so I'm seeing them in a different way, but I thought that 2nd nums was easy, just 18x8 + 1, ah well. I really struggled with the letters that game though (again).
Well, I was three away because 2 large is evil and should be exterminated.
As a 6 small player, I thought you'd be one of the ones to have destroyed it
Not when there are big shiny large numbers distracting you.