Page 1 of 1
Spoilers for Friday April 20th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 69)
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:44 pm
by Jordan F
It's 4/20 and it's the 69th prelim. Mr. Morrison, if you want to make a joke based on these facts, be my guest.
Matt Heal got win number 2 yesterday, he needs the third to be in contention for the finals though, can he do it? It's the end of Margaret Mountford this week, and overall I like her. Had bad moments yes, but I think there's been significantly worse corner guests before her.
Join Thomas for the recap later.
Re: Spoilers for Friday April 20th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 69
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:18 pm
by Matt Morrison
Jordan F wrote:It's 4/20 and it's the 69th prelim.
Re: Spoilers for Friday April 20th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 69
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:34 pm
by James Robinson
INDENTORS for 9 in round 8
Re: Spoilers for Friday April 20th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 69
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:36 pm
by James Robinson
DRAGNET in round 9 as a nice equaller.
Re: Spoilers for Friday April 20th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 69
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:47 pm
by James Robinson
EMBOLUS as an equaller in round 12.
Re: Spoilers for Friday April 20th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 69
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:09 pm
by John Garcia
GRADATE as an equaller in R9.
MATRIXES similar in R7.
Alt 2nd numbers - ((7x3x5)+1)x9
Be sure of it!
Re: Spoilers for Friday April 20th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 69
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:12 pm
by James Robinson
John Garcia wrote:Alt 2nd numbers - ((7x3x5)+1)x9
I don't think that makes 934, John.
And also Rachel used that method for her 954 in round 5............
Re: Spoilers for Friday April 20th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 69
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:05 pm
by Tony Atkins
A real alt second numbers: ((100-6)x(9+1))-(2x3)=934.
Re: Spoilers for Friday April 20th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 69
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 5:05 pm
by John Garcia
James Robinson wrote:John Garcia wrote:Alt 2nd numbers - ((7x3x5)+1)x9
I don't think that makes 934, John.
And also Rachel used that method for her 954 in round 5............
OOps, I meant 1st numbers game then! I thought Rachel made the 106 differently, but wasn't paying attention.