Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 24

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:59 pm
by Jordan F
Victoria James is still here, in what was arguably her best performance thus far yesterday, but I still think she probably has a ways to go before getting to an octochamp type level. Can she inch closer today. Kate Humble is still in the Corner...and I think I've decided I don't like her. She seems a bit..I don't know if smug is the right word, but there's something about when she talks about words that she obviously didn't find that bothers me. Sorry Corby.

James will recap into the night later.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:11 pm
by Jon Corby
Jordan F wrote:Sorry Corby.
Why?

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:14 pm
by Jordan F
Jon Corby wrote:
Jordan F wrote:Sorry Corby.
Why?
Because you were trying to convince me to like her with that video you were talking about, but I just can't do it.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:16 pm
by Jon Corby
Jordan F wrote:
Jon Corby wrote:
Jordan F wrote:Sorry Corby.
Why?
Because you were trying to convince me to like her with that video you were talking about, but I just can't do it.
Not really. I just think it's always better to have as much information as possible when making a decision. I often find that annoying people become far less annoying if I like their boobs.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:52 pm
by Jack Worsley
SIDESMAN in round 7 and TETRODE in round 13.

1st numbers: (75+9)x8+9+6 = 287
2nd numbers: (75/(4-1))x4x2 = 200
3rd numbers: (75-6)x(10-1)=7-1 = 627

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:55 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Jon Corby wrote:I often find that annoying people become far less annoying if I like their boobs.
I'll be taking a photo of mine to send you as soon as the tray of ice cubes I've just put in the freezer is ready.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:58 pm
by John Garcia
Round 12 - ACTIVES for 7 to match DC's ABUSIVE

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:20 pm
by Karen Pearson
I thought I got two nines today but as no one else has mentioned them, I'm wondering if I am mistaken! (I was busy cooking so I wasn't giving it my full attention)
BAROMETER
MANGINESS

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:37 pm
by Keith Bennett
Karen Pearson wrote:I thought I got two nines today but as no one else has mentioned them, I'm wondering if I am mistaken! (I was busy cooking so I wasn't giving it my full attention)
BAROMETER
MANGINESS
Was looking for 2nd R to come out for BAROMETER but it didn't, second T instead

And I got ASSIGNED somewhere which may be the other round you're thinking of, so D instead of 2nd N (assuming I wrote them down correctly).

Bet the food's good though!

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:41 pm
by Karen Pearson
:-(
Thought it was too good to be true!

Spicy pork and bean casserole. Smells yummy!

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:50 pm
by Brian Moore
Jordan F wrote:Kate Humble is still in the Corner...and I think I've decided I don't like her. She seems a bit..I don't know if smug is the right word, but there's something about when she talks about words that she obviously didn't find that bothers me.
I'm with you on this, Jordan - tries to sound authoritative but doesn't pull the act off, or acknowledge that she's been fed words. Her comment for FIANCES "doesn't look right" was splendid. Nothing interesting to say, basically.

Other than that, she's great.

2nd numbers alt:
(4x5x2) x (4+1) = 200

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:07 pm
by Graeme Cole
OATIER in the GOATIER^ round.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:08 pm
by James Robinson
Brian Moore wrote:2nd numbers alt:
(4x5x2) x (4+1) = 200
Which is what Rachel did, but put in a different way........... :oops: :roll:
Jack Worsley wrote:TETRODE in round 13.
11, surely :?:
Jack Worsley wrote:1st numbers: (75+9)x8+9+6 = 287
25, surely :?: Your sum equals 687 :!:

UNIPED in round 1, ORGEAT in round 2, ABETTOR in round 4, COINAGES in round 6, SOIGNEE & WIGEONS in round 8, DUIKERS in round 9 and LLANERO in round 13.

1st Numbers Alt.: (25 x 8) + (9 x 9) + 6 = 287

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:56 pm
by David Barnard
I think I got BERETTA in round 4, I swear I have heard of it before but haven't verified it, maybe saw it in one of Jack W's games, if I was in the studio I would certainly risk declaring that

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:08 pm
by James Robinson
David Barnard wrote:I think I got BERETTA in round 4, I swear I have heard of it before but haven't verified it, maybe saw it in one of Jack W's games, if I was in the studio I would certainly risk declaring that
Unfortunately, it's BIRETTA, but ABETTER is a valid anagram of beretta.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:23 pm
by David Barnard
James Robinson wrote:
David Barnard wrote:I think I got BERETTA in round 4, I swear I have heard of it before but haven't verified it, maybe saw it in one of Jack W's games, if I was in the studio I would certainly risk declaring that
Unfortunately, it's BIRETTA, but ABETTER is a valid anagram of beretta.
Ah right, that's why it wasn't mentioned then, I thought I had 116 points but now it's been slashed to 109 but we dont mind :D

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:04 pm
by Brian Moore
James Robinson wrote:
Brian Moore wrote:2nd numbers alt:
(4x5x2) x (4+1) = 200
Which is what Rachel did, but put in a different way........... :oops: :roll:
Sorry, James. I must pay more attention in class. I was probably wiping lasagne off the keyboard at the time. (I won't bother to put that in the Tonight's Dinner thread now.)

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:39 am
by Andy Platt
Only just got round to watching this, thought the champ wasn't up to the same standard today - I'd only have beaten her yesterday because of her not being up to scratch with numbers. This time, she was showing a bit less gaminess and was a little lousier.

Round 10 weird alternative, (4+4)*75/(2+1), taking it up to 600 needlessly, everything else posted already. Glad I spotted LLANERO, haven't seen that word for ages