Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 19

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:44 pm
by Jordan F
Neil Hewitt continues to win, he's a low scoring champ but he is winning and has three to his name thus far. Can he get to the half octochamp mark today? Dr. Phil Hammond is still here, and still has yet to show his plums to anybody yet, whether that's a good thing or not depends on the individual viewer, but regardless he might be saving them for a special occasion.

Join James for one of his soon to be copyrighted, maybe, Robinson Recaps later.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:36 pm
by John Brackstone
Antique for an equaller

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:02 pm
by John Garcia
Handbaker for the conundrum - classic!!!

Was it just me, or was that the easiest conundrum ever? I'm crap at conundrums, but even I got that almost right away.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:15 pm
by Jack Worsley
John Garcia wrote:Handbaker for the conundrum - classic!!!

Was it just me, or was that the easiest conundrum ever? I'm crap at conundrums, but even I got that almost right away.
HANDBRAKE jumped out at me very quickly but I was thrown because I thought it would be more scrambled if it was the answer. Took me a few seconds to realise I was right first time. Nice to see I've got some competition for the worst conundrum guess of the series. :lol:

PETUNIA in round 6, GOURDES in round 7 and ROOTSIER in round 12.

1st numbers alt: 25x(7+5)x3-2=898

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:50 pm
by Rhys Benjamin
Jordan F wrote:Join James for one of his soon to be copyrighted, maybe, Robinson Recaps later.
:?: :?

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:55 pm
by Tony Atkins
UNMEANT as an alt in R1

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:04 pm
by Jordan F
Rhys Benjamin wrote:
Jordan F wrote:Join James for one of his soon to be copyrighted, maybe, Robinson Recaps later.
:?: :?
Bad joke on my part.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:06 pm
by James Robinson
Tony Atkins wrote:UNMEANT as an alt in R1
Round 2, surely :?: :oops:

MY FIRST MAX GAME OF 2012 FOR ME!!! ;) :) :D :mrgreen: 8-)

CERULEAN in round 4 and INTRORSE (which I remembered from earlier in the week) in round 12.

Also quite liked Jocelyn too, she had a nice aura around her. Hope she can win a few more.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:58 pm
by Matt Morrison
Jordan F wrote:
Rhys Benjamin wrote:
Jordan F wrote:Join James for one of his soon to be copyrighted, maybe, Robinson Recaps later.
:?: :?
Bad joke on my part.
Jordan - it's pretty much become an unwritten (and sometimes written) rule of the forum that if Rhys suggests you've done something wrong, don't worry. Don't worry.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:08 pm
by John Garcia
James Robinson wrote: Also quite liked Jocelyn too, she had a nice aura around her. Hope she can win a few more.
She was really good in the letters round I thought. Bizarre that her letters seem to be so much better than her numbers (given she is a maths tutor).

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:46 pm
by Thomas Carey
John Garcia wrote:
James Robinson wrote: Also quite liked Jocelyn too, she had a nice aura around her. Hope she can win a few more.
She was really good in the letters round I thought. Bizarre that her letters seem to be so much better than her numbers (given she is a maths tutor).
Agreed. She sort of reminded me of Christine Buffrey but loads, loads better.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:13 am
by John Bosley
John Garcia wrote: ........ Bizarre that her letters seem to be so much better than her numbers (given she is a maths tutor).
Is there a necessary connection between maths and the numbers game ?

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 2nd 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:15 pm
by Gavin Chipper
John Bosley wrote:
John Garcia wrote: ........ Bizarre that her letters seem to be so much better than her numbers (given she is a maths tutor).
Is there a necessary connection between maths and the numbers game ?
There isn't but I'm often surprised that mathsy people don't seem to know their way around arithmetic very well. You also don't even need to be particularly good at mental arithmetic to do numbers games, unless perhaps you do six small. You just need to know a few basic methods.