Page 1 of 1

Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:39 pm
by James Robinson
If anyone thinks that being a highly skilled Apterite almost guarantees you octochampdom, take a look at yesterday's game. Our Graeme was lucky to pass Graham Moonie-Dalton yesterday, and he will have to up his game today to make sure that that was just a blip and nothing permanent.

Liam will be joining you for the recap later. ;) :) :D

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:18 pm
by Stuart Arnot
R1 SIMOLEON

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:53 pm
by Tom Barnes
Well done again Graeme, seriously concerned for my record there

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:06 pm
by Tony Atkins
Tom Barnes wrote:Well done again Graeme, seriously concerned for my record there
It was higher score v zero, but that's not an official record.

I was quite please to equal Graeme in 12 rounds and nearly risked MATELESS, but didn't. Can anyone explain why TEAMLESS is not in ODE3, but MEATLESS and MATELESS are?

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:24 pm
by Jon O'Neill
Tony Atkins wrote:It was higher score v zero, but that's not an official record.
Who decides what constitutes an official record, out of interest?

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:33 pm
by Michael Wallace
Jon O'Neill wrote:
Tony Atkins wrote:It was higher score v zero, but that's not an official record.
Who decides what constitutes an official record, out of interest?
Me.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:43 pm
by Dan McColm
Good performance, Graeme, you missed very little. I spotted HAVELI in round 8.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:59 pm
by Joyce Phillips
Well done Graeme. Hard to keep concentrating against such poor opposition.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:35 pm
by Brian Moore
Good performance from Graeme after yesterday's scorcher, but oh dear, what a car crash for the challenger. I can only assume nerves got to him - lots of silly mistakes, missing obvious words and numbers. Not one of the most comfortable games to watch - even the last numbers I thought "phew", then he screwed it up. Oh dear indeed. Probably enough to make Graeme uncomfortable too.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:04 pm
by James Robinson
Jon O'Neill wrote:
Tony Atkins wrote:It was higher score v zero, but that's not an official record.
Who decides what constitutes an official record, out of interest?
Well there was a record (of sorts) set today.

Since Graeme was 79 points ahead at the end of part 2, it was impossible for Mike to win, even with 3 9's and the numbers and conundrum.

So, that was the earliest a game was actually won in the history of the show. :geek:

It was also the 3rd highest winning margin, out of interest.

FOETID in round 12 and REBASING in round 13.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:19 pm
by Ryan Taylor
James Robinson wrote:
Jon O'Neill wrote:
Tony Atkins wrote:It was higher score v zero, but that's not an official record.
Who decides what constitutes an official record, out of interest?
Well there was a record (of sorts) set today.

Since Graeme was 79 points ahead at the end of part 2, it was impossible for Mike to win, even with 3 9's and the numbers and conundrum.

So, that was the earliest a game was actually won in the history of the show. :geek:

It was also the 3rd highest winning margin, out of interest.

FOETID in round 12 and REBASING in round 13.
Please go on Mastermind and chooe Countdown as your specialist subject.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:24 pm
by Adam Gillard
Ryan Taylor wrote:
James Robinson wrote: :geek:
Please go on Mastermind and choo[s]e Countdown as your specialist subject.
This would be Really Kewell (Harry's cousin).

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:00 pm
by Keith Bennett
The letters rounds, fine. A lot of contestants faced with a top notch contestant like Graeme lose several rounds by one letter that they wouldn't to most other players; as a result their score on the day doesn't look too clever. But this guy screwed up 30 fairly straightforward points on numbers games. Graeme even abandoned 6 small for the first one which gave him a very fair chance.

The more I see heats like this the more I believe they need a rethink. Most of the people now in their 50s+ who both want to do the show and are genuinely good enough have probably already been on. If C4 insist, as they probably do, that the contestants are drawn from as wide a spectrum as possible in terms of age, gender, location and so on then sooner or later surely the rules have to change to let past contestants re-apply.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:15 pm
by Mike Brown
Ryan Taylor wrote:Please go on Mastermind and chooe Countdown as your specialist subject.
**LIKE **

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:16 pm
by Mike Brown
Tony Atkins wrote:Can anyone explain why TEAMLESS is not in ODE3, but MEATLESS and MATELESS are?
Presumably because it's less commonly used in written English, at least according to the Oxford corpus.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:51 pm
by Philip Jarvis
Ryan Taylor wrote:
James Robinson wrote: :geek:
Please go on Mastermind and choo[s]e Countdown as your specialist subject.
Yes - and just think ...... If you happen to lose, their rules allow you to go back on again at a later date. LOL

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:20 pm
by Brian Moore
Mike Brown wrote:
Tony Atkins wrote:Can anyone explain why TEAMLESS is not in ODE3, but MEATLESS and MATELESS are?
Presumably because it's less commonly used in written English, at least according to the Oxford corpus.
I sometimes have my doubts about how the Oxford corpus decides these things. Even if it is all computerised, the weighting given to different sources must be a human decision. Or is it a panel of the great and the good, cigar in one hand, glass of port in the other, taking a break from discussing the finer points of ancient Greece (or whatever Really Clever People do)?