c4countdown

Ryan Taylor wrote:

Jon Corby wrote:

Matt Morrison wrote: (Jono?)

That's Beevers a bit further up as well, isn't it?

Very good.

I meant the guy with the nunchucks, not a generic "beaver" joke btw. You knew that, right?

Jon Corby wrote:I meant the guy with the nunchucks, not a generic "beaver" joke btw. You knew that, right?

This reminds me of the c4c football thread.

Jon Corby wrote:

Matt Morrison wrote: (Jono?)

That's Beevers a bit further up as well, isn't it?

Haha I knew which pic you meant straight away without looking, that's excellent!

I still can't work out how the hell that naked family portrait happens.

In other news, now that we're on the second page I'll just post two pics per post and loading won't be so hairy in future.

Matt Morrison wrote:I still can't work out how the hell that naked family portrait happens.

While it is a bit unusual, and I wouldn't do it, there isn't actually (necessarily) anything 'wrong' with it at all.

Jon Corby wrote:

Matt Morrison wrote:I still can't work out how the hell that naked family portrait happens.

While it is a bit unusual, and I wouldn't do it, there isn't actually (necessarily) anything 'wrong' with it at all.

I actually quite liked it. It was my favourite of the lat. I love the naturalness of it and the innocence.

Ryan Taylor wrote:

Jon Corby wrote:

Matt Morrison wrote:I still can't work out how the hell that naked family portrait happens.

While it is a bit unusual, and I wouldn't do it, there isn't actually (necessarily) anything 'wrong' with it at all.

I actually quite liked it. It was my favourite of the lat. I love the naturalness of it and the innocence.

Precisely. My kids pile up on me (not naked) and there's nothing sexual about it, but then obviously there still wouldn't be even if we were naked. You kind of make the assumption as well that as a family they are comfortable being naked around each other, there isn't actually really any reason why that shouldn't be the case. As you say, it's a pose for art, there's nothing sexual in it, I too find it quite beautiful.

That said, I'd also like to fuck the arse off the mother in the picture.

Jon Corby wrote:That said, I'd also like to fuck the arse off the mother in the picture.

5th from the bottom for me (top one).

Jon Corby wrote:

Ryan Taylor wrote:

Jon Corby wrote:While it is a bit unusual, and I wouldn't do it, there isn't actually (necessarily) anything 'wrong' with it at all.

I actually quite liked it. It was my favourite of the lat. I love the naturalness of it and the innocence.

Precisely. My kids pile up on me (not naked) and there's nothing sexual about it, but then obviously there still wouldn't be even if we were naked. You kind of make the assumption as well that as a family they are comfortable being naked around each other, there isn't actually really any reason why that shouldn't be the case. As you say, it's a pose for art, there's nothing sexual in it, I too find it quite beautiful.

That said, I'd also like to fuck the arse off the mother in the picture.

Beautiful? That picture is the antithesis of beauty and art. It's vulgar and horrific. It's not sexual... far from it. But it is child abuse to expose your kids to such a massacre of taste.

Jon O'Neill wrote:Beautiful? That picture is the antithesis of beauty and art. It's vulgar and horrific. It's not sexual... far from it. But it is child abuse to expose your kids to such a massacre of taste.

I have no idea what you find vulgar or horrific about it, but as long as you're not slating it on anything other than subjective artistic merit, then fair dos.

ETA Now's the moment when Matt pwns us totally and explains that the kids have all been taken into care after the parents have raped 35 kids or something.

Jon Corby wrote:

Jon O'Neill wrote:Beautiful? That picture is the antithesis of beauty and art. It's vulgar and horrific. It's not sexual... far from it. But it is child abuse to expose your kids to such a massacre of taste.

I have no idea what you find vulgar or horrific about it, but as long as you're not slating it on anything other than subjective artistic merit, then fair dos.

I dunno, I'm not big into art, but I do get offended by stuff like that. It's probably something to do with how forced and unnatural it is when it's trying to be EXACTLY the opposite. The stupid grins clash with the naked bodies. They look like stacked-up corpses in some mass grave from the Holocaust.

Oh yeah, and p33dofiles.

Jon O'Neill wrote:

Jon Corby wrote:

Jon O'Neill wrote:Beautiful? That picture is the antithesis of beauty and art. It's vulgar and horrific. It's not sexual... far from it. But it is child abuse to expose your kids to such a massacre of taste.

I have no idea what you find vulgar or horrific about it, but as long as you're not slating it on anything other than subjective artistic merit, then fair dos.

I dunno, I'm not big into art, but I do get offended by stuff like that. It's probably something to do with how forced and unnatural it is when it's trying to be EXACTLY the opposite. The stupid grins clash with the naked bodies. They look like stacked-up corpses in some mass grave from the Holocaust.

Oh yeah, and p33dofiles.

Oh okay. I find those pretty daft objections then, tbf. (I don't really love it that much btw, I just gushed about it like that to give my crude line at the end about fucking the mother more impact.)

But, they're a family (I assume). Nothing about it looks forced or unnatural to me, particularly the smiles.

I just looked again, and this time, I threw up.

Jon O'Neill wrote:I just looked again, and this time, I spunked up.

You disgust me.

(Edit: Oops, I probably shouldn't play with my balls on a subforum that you moderate )

Poor.

Just thought I'd put some captions to some of these pictures, with the catch being that every caption has to be a direct quote from a film. (I've got a couple more, but like Matt said I'm trying to limit the number of pictures in each post).


Nobody puts Baby in a corner.- Dirty Dancing


Looks like somebody threw away a perfectly good white boy.- Men at Work


I see dead people- The Sixth Sense


You don't understand! I could’ve had class.I could’ve been a contender. I could've been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what I am.- On the Waterfront

Haha, solid contribution.

Haha yes, that made me chuckle inside and I don't really know why.

Candidate for oddest headline of the year award. Article is here.

(jono)

Matt Morrison wrote:

It's the way you can see it on their screens

One word, love: wax

Not quite in the same humorous vein, but did any of you see this from yesterday's Tour de France?:





Video:
http://ewoud.home.xs4all.nl/cycling/201 ... crash.html

Hoogerland was catapulted into the barbed wire fence at about 30mph - it hardly bears thinking about. And then both of the riders knocked off the road by the car carried on to finish the 204km stage. Incredible.

Bet he wishes he'd sorted those tan lines out before being photographed like that. So embarrassing.

Jon O'Neill wrote:Bet he wishes he'd sorted those tan lines out before being photographed like that. So embarrassing.

Not as embarrassing as this:

Haha quality.

Also noting the insensitive barbed wire tattoo there.

Matt Morrison wrote:Haha quality.

Also noting the insensitive barbed wire tattoo there.

What? What's going on? Are they all urinating or something? What am I missing? Is it something to do with Deeks?

Jon Corby wrote:

Matt Morrison wrote:Haha quality.

Also noting the insensitive barbed wire tattoo there.

What? What's going on? Are they all urinating or something? What am I missing? Is it something to do with Deeks?

I hope they're all pissing. Otherwise I just wasted a wank.

Matt Morrison wrote:I hope they're all pissing. Otherwise I just wasted a wank.

Oh. I can't actually see any pee though. I guess I kinda can if I look real hard in front of the first guy.

A few more captions:

These go to eleven.- This is Spinal Tap



He's not the Messiah - he's a very naughty boy.- Life of Brian



If you build it, he will come.- Field of Dreams



Say “hello” to my little friend!- Scarface



Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue- Airplane




With this one I was spoiled for choice:
Nice beaver!- The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!
We're not worthy. We're not worthy.- Wayne's World
Mr. DeMille, I'm ready for my close-up.- Sunset Boulevard
Or, given Lesleys comments above:
I'd like to make her look a little more attractive, how far can you pull back?:- How do you feel about Cleveland?'- Tootsie
Or even :
Wax on, wax off.- The Karate Kid

Haha. I like the Scarface one. That thing looks like it could definitely be mafia. And the kiss. haha.

Matt Morrison wrote:Haha. I like the Scarface one. That thing looks like it could definitely be mafia. And the kiss. haha.

Scarface wasn't in the mafia :@

Gangster's kiss.

Charlie Reams wrote:

My boss has one of those swanky digital photo frames that works off a memory stick with a load of photos of his family and stuff on it and my colleague and I just added that one.

And by the way, that is Jimmy Saville introducing Frank Bruno to Peter Sutcliffe.

Andy Wilson wrote:And by the way, that is Jimmy Saville introducing Frank Bruno to Peter Sutcliffe.

I remember that "serial killers special" episode well, it caused outrage at the time. I seem to recall Jim fixing it for Ian Brady and Myra Hindley to perform with Cheryl Baker and Mike Nolan as Bucks Fizz causing the biggest stir.

I'm back, bitches!

Solid.