Page 1 of 1
Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 1:05 pm
by James Robinson
And it's go, GO,
GO on
Countdown as GO-Master Tony Atkins put in a very impressive performance after seeming to be out of it after part 1. Will there be any more thrills and spills today
Join me as I make 5 Of A Kind, and do my first current Friday recap to complete the set.

Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:18 pm
by Tony Atkins
I case you are wondering, yes Jordan is Jamie Humphries' (2 wins back in January) sister. Will she do as
well?
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:23 pm
by Charlie Reams
Tony Atkins wrote:I case you are wondering, yes Jordan is Jamie Humphries' (2 wins back in January) sister. Will she do as
well?
I salute your indefatigability.
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:26 pm
by Matt Morrison
I'm getting quite into the idea of Go after Tony championed it. Some useful information from the Wikipedia entry:

Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:30 pm
by Tony Atkins
Matt Morrison wrote:I'm getting quite into the idea of Go after Tony championed it. Some useful information from the Wikipedia entry:
http://www.britgo.org for British Go Association
www.kisekigo.com is my own site
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:37 pm
by Adam Gillard
I've never lost a single game of Go (I've never played a single game of Go). Maybe I could beat you, Tony...
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:38 pm
by Michael Wallace
I've watched the entire anime series Hikaru No Go, so I probably could as well.
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:43 pm
by Adam Gillard
PERIDOTS not in the Apterous dictionary for some reason... I strongly suggest Charlie / Mike read page xiii of ODE3 and fix silly things like this and CLOVERS.
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:44 pm
by Charlie Reams
I'm already pretty good at draughts so Go probably isn't that interesting for me.
I strongly suggest Charlie / Mike read page xiii of ODE3 and fix silly things like this and CLOVERS.
Well, since you ask so nicely...
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:46 pm
by Tony Atkins
I was very careful to check every answer except in the DUMPED round. I had a whole lot of 6s, eg POUNDS, MOUNDS and presumably HUMPED. Somehow I had writen HUMPED down as DUMPED and didn't check it. Should have picked one of the others....
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:51 pm
by Matt Morrison
Tony Atkins wrote:I was very careful to check every answer except in the DUMPED round. I had a whole lot of 6s, eg POUNDS, MOUNDS and presumably HUMPED. Somehow I had writen HUMPED down as DUMPED and didn't check it. Should have picked one of the others....
Don't you mean H*MPED, Tony!!! This week is full of rude words!
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:56 pm
by Adam Gillard
Charlie Reams wrote:
I strongly suggest Charlie / Mike read page xiii of ODE3 and fix silly things like this and CLOVERS.
Well, since you ask so nicely...
I strongly suggest... please.
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:58 pm
by Tony Atkins
Matt Morrison wrote:Tony Atkins wrote:I was very careful to check every answer except in the DUMPED round. I had a whole lot of 6s, eg POUNDS, MOUNDS and presumably HUMPED. Somehow I had writen HUMPED down as DUMPED and didn't check it. Should have picked one of the others....
Don't you mean H*MPED, Tony!!! This week is full of rude words!
Well there must be a lot of rude bridges out there! The combination of PISTONS and PASSION was a little bit rude...
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 3:14 pm
by Peter Mabey
Tony Atkins wrote:...
Don't you mean H*MPED, Tony!!! This week is full of rude words!
There are a couple of signs hereabouts warning of a "H****d Zebra Crossing", but I've never seen the animals at it

Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 3:25 pm
by Eoin Monaghan
ENTRESOL was there in round 4, the same selection as in my 6th game.
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 3:40 pm
by Tony Atkins
Adam Gillard wrote:I've never lost a single game of Go (I've never played a single game of Go). Maybe I could beat you, Tony...
I don't expect there will be time on Tuesday afternoon!
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 4:06 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Eoin Monaghan wrote:ENTRESOL was there in round 4, the same selection as in my 6th game.
And TENONERS and CRINOID in another round.
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 4:34 pm
by James Robinson
Eoin Monaghan wrote:ENTRESOL was there in round 4, the same selection as in my 6th game.
I thought it was your 7th game

Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 4:38 pm
by Brian Moore
Thought there was the alternative 7 ^LAGGIER in R1, but a bit surprised it's not yet in ODE, (nor ^LAGGY), as it's quite a common word in computerage. (42,000 and 2.75 million Google hits respectively.)
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 4:39 pm
by Adam Gillard
Brian Moore wrote:Thought there was the alternative 7 ^LAGGIER in R1, but a bit surprised it's not yet in ODE, (nor ^LAGGY), as it's quite a common word in computerage. (42,000 and 2.75 million Google hits respectively.)
The Oxford English Corpus is the Google of OUP's world.
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 5:01 pm
by Brian Moore
Adam Gillard wrote:The Oxford English Corpus is the Google of OUP's world.
Hmm, I'm very happy for the OUP, but 2.75m Google hits, and with OED saying "No Search Results", suggests that the corpus isn't quite up to speed on this one. Occasionally I feel the OED and ODE pick up more ephemeral jargonny words, and miss less obvious neologisms in common usage. (This conjecture is probably as accurate at the amateur weather forecasters who say that their forecasts made by sniffing pine cones are more accurate than those made by the Met Office with their Jolly Big computers. But I know that Charlie always likes conjecture with no citation or reasoning.)
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 5:43 pm
by Eoin Monaghan
James Robinson wrote:Eoin Monaghan wrote:ENTRESOL was there in round 4, the same selection as in my 6th game.
I thought it was your 7th game

Haha, I knew it. I wasn't sure which game and I knew you'd pick up on it

Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 7:01 pm
by Philip Jarvis
Did Keith Bennett get an answer to his question yesterday?
No word of a lie, my wife Julie watched today's episode whilst doing the ironing and asked if Tony is a carpet salesman. I was bit nonplussed until she said "He's got a nice line in rugs."
I remain au naturelle.
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Sat May 07, 2011 9:36 am
by Tony Atkins
Philip Jarvis wrote:Did Keith Bennett get an answer to his question yesterday?
No word of a lie, my wife Julie watched today's episode whilst doing the ironing and asked if Tony is a carpet salesman. I was bit nonplussed until she said "He's got a nice line in rugs."
I remain au naturelle.
It's the hairspray! Took my jumper off later and it all stood on end. Pehaps you are just being polite and suggesting in needs cutting?
Not enough time this week to do so with the finals on Tuesday/Wednesday (and Monday I am helping Roger scout out his summer holiday in Sheffield). Sorry I will not be able to post too much this week as a consequence - but there are some good shows coming up, so enjoy!
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Sat May 07, 2011 11:42 am
by Charlie Reams
Brian Moore wrote:2.75m Google hits, and with OED saying "No Search Results"
It's not saying No Results. It's saying Not Enough Results To Make It Into A Dictionary With Only 2000 Pages.
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Sat May 07, 2011 4:32 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Charlie Reams wrote:Brian Moore wrote:2.75m Google hits, and with OED saying "No Search Results"
It's not saying No Results. It's saying Not Enough Results To Make It Into A Dictionary With Only 2000 Pages.
"Slang" terms seem to be held to higher standards then "non-slang" ones. Is flid in the dictionary yet?
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Sat May 07, 2011 10:08 pm
by Brian Moore
Charlie Reams wrote:Brian Moore wrote:2.75m Google hits, and with OED saying "No Search Results"
It's not saying No Results. It's saying Not Enough Results To Make It Into A Dictionary With Only 2000 Pages.
Well, I'll do a deal with OED then if they're so short of space. They can take out 'cyberslacking' (new entry December 2010, 32,600 Google hits) and put in 'laggy' (and 'laggier') instead.
The trouble with these obviously 'constructed' new words is that they tend to fail the FUDGE test (Frequency, Unobtrusiveness, Diversity, Generation, Endurance) for words likely to make it into common usage: they're in all the papers for a while, but disappear soon after. In think 'laggy' will be still be around once 'cyberslacking' has gone.
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Sat May 07, 2011 10:55 pm
by Charlie Reams
Brian Moore wrote:Charlie Reams wrote:Brian Moore wrote:2.75m Google hits, and with OED saying "No Search Results"
It's not saying No Results. It's saying Not Enough Results To Make It Into A Dictionary With Only 2000 Pages.
Well, I'll do a deal with OED then if they're so short of space. They can take out 'cyberslacking' (new entry December 2010, 32,600 Google hits) and put in 'laggy' (and 'laggier') instead.
The trouble with these obviously 'constructed' new words is that they tend to fail the FUDGE test (Frequency, Unobtrusiveness, Diversity, Generation, Endurance) for words likely to make it into common usage: they're in all the papers for a while, but disappear soon after. In think 'laggy' will be still be around once 'cyberslacking' has gone.
I agree FWIW.
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 10:32 pm
by David Williams
SWAPTION has 111,000 hits.
I've never understood how they decide a word is in common enough usage to get in. Words that are commonly used in a highly specialised area are going to get less usage than uncommon transitory slang. They surely don't just go on numbers.
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 4:26 pm
by Peter Mabey
I think print media are given more weight, so that newspaper favourites win over words in common internet use

Re: Spoilers For Friday May 6th 2011
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 6:15 pm
by Martin Gardner
I thought Jordan looked a lot like Jameela Jamil of T4, and even a bit like a young Cheryl Cole. Oh, and good game and all that.