Page 1 of 1

Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:22 am
by Ben Hunter
Post your spellars in this thread.

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:35 am
by James Robinson
Well that ends my run this year :!: :lol:

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:20 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Is it my recap today?

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:25 pm
by James Robinson
Ryan Taylor wrote:Is it my recap today?
Yes. :D

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:20 pm
by Tom Barnes
PAGANISE disallowed?

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:28 pm
by James Nguyen
Tom Barnes wrote:PAGANISE disallowed?
This; DC's mistake's or ... ?

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:40 pm
by Joseph Krol
UNEXACTED?

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:28 pm
by Josh Hurst
Obelised was there as a beater in round 3, and fasciae as an equaller in round 4.

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:58 pm
by Malcolm James
R10

7x5=35
35-3=32
32x6=192
192-7=185
185x5=925

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 7:13 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Did not know what to do regarding PAGANISE. So have listed it as disallowed by Susie and not counted it on Ned's total but then listed it as OT and included it in the max. Quite retarded yes but I don't know what is best since both apterous and the recap writer says it is valid.

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:34 pm
by Graeme Cole
Ryan Taylor wrote:Did not know what to do regarding PAGANISE. So have listed it as disallowed by Susie and not counted it on Ned's total but then listed it as OT and included it in the max. Quite retarded yes but I don't know what is best since both apterous and the recap writer says it is valid.
I was surprised at it being disallowed, but I've checked my ODE3 and PAGANISE^ isn't in it. Nor is PAGANIZE^.

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:03 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Graeme Cole wrote:
Ryan Taylor wrote:Did not know what to do regarding PAGANISE. So have listed it as disallowed by Susie and not counted it on Ned's total but then listed it as OT and included it in the max. Quite retarded yes but I don't know what is best since both apterous and the recap writer says it is valid.
I was surprised at it being disallowed, but I've checked my ODE3 and PAGANISE^ isn't in it. Nor is PAGANIZE^.
Thanks for clearing this up Graeme.

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:37 pm
by Mike Brown
Joseph Krol wrote:UNEXACTED?
'Fraid not, Joseph...