Page 1 of 1

Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:28 pm
by James Robinson
Into the midweek we arrive, and following on from yesterday's gut-wrenching finish, Andy just about remains in the champions' chair. But can he survive the next onslaught :?:

I'll be around later with the Robinson Recap. ;) :) :D :mrgreen: 8-)

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:02 pm
by Adam Gillard
Every Wednesday I half expect another aptoctochamp to be waiting in the wings, but there can't be that many to have one on every week, surely?...

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:16 pm
by James Robinson
Adam Gillard wrote:Every Wednesday I half expect another aptoctochamp to be waiting in the wings, but there can't be that many to have one on every week, surely?...
Not impossible, but they would probably have to spread out nicely, or in other words, start their run on a Thursday or Friday, then they'd be on 3 separate weeks. :idea:

EDIT: We have already failed for this series, as we had no octochamp 3 weeks ago. :geek:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:07 pm
by Dan McColm
Call it a hunch, but I think there'll be an apterite on tomorrow

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:32 pm
by Joseph Krol
NOYADES in the EXPANDS round

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:34 pm
by Stewart Gordon
Have enough chess players BISHOPED their pawns for this word to be in there?

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:43 pm
by Adam Gillard
Dan McColm wrote:Call it a hunch, but I think there'll be an apterite on tomorrow
Is it Dale Levell? :?

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:46 pm
by Adam Gillard
RURALIST in the RITUALS round

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:15 pm
by Tony Atkins
Adam Gillard wrote:RURALIST in the RITUALS round
The other DC beater was MOMENTA, with equallers OUTMAN and MANQUE,
in R8 where Ms Dent said AMOUNT was the only 6.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:00 pm
by James Robinson
Also DYSPNOEA in round 4 and OMENTUM in round 8.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:24 pm
by Graeme Cole
Did anyone else notice Jeff made the all-too-common error of saying "astrological" instead of "astronomical" during his opening anecdote? And shout things at the screen as a result?

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:27 pm
by Mike Brown
Graeme Cole wrote:Did anyone else notice Jeff made the all-too-common error of saying "astrological" instead of "astronomical" during his opening anecdote? And shout things at the screen as a result?
Yes, but there was no shouting from me, just an inward "oh no, not again"!

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:23 am
by Stewart Gordon
Graeme Cole wrote:Did anyone else notice Jeff made the all-too-common error of saying "astrological" instead of "astronomical" during his opening anecdote? And shout things at the screen as a result?
Indeed, it got me thinking along the lines of "a telescope that sees into the future?"

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:41 pm
by Rhys Benjamin
I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
:x

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:42 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Rhys Benjamin wrote:I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
:x
Where did you find this out?

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:39 am
by Rhys Benjamin
On the internet.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:40 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Rhys Benjamin wrote:On the internet.
I found nothing.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:13 am
by Rhys Benjamin
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Rhys Benjamin wrote:On the internet.
I found nothing.
That's because the video was taken off YouTube.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:34 am
by Ian Volante
Rhys Benjamin wrote:I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
:x
Technically? You mean they sampled the engine noise and the crunch or something?

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:49 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Ian Volante wrote:
Rhys Benjamin wrote:I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
:x
Technically? You mean they sampled the engine noise and the crunch or something?
It sounds unlikely. The only "evidence" is apparently some video that was taken down from YouTube.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 6:03 pm
by JimBentley
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Ian Volante wrote:
Rhys Benjamin wrote:I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
:x
Technically? You mean they sampled the engine noise and the crunch or something?
It sounds unlikely. The only "evidence" is apparently some video that was taken down from YouTube.
And why would a shampoo advert use the audio from a Formula 1 crash in which someone dies? Who could possibly think that was a good idea (given that any production company making such an advert would have access to pretty much an unlimited amount of stock sound effects)? It all sounds very unlikely to me.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:07 pm
by Rhys Benjamin
JimBentley wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Ian Volante wrote:Technically? You mean they sampled the engine noise and the crunch or something?
It sounds unlikely. The only "evidence" is apparently some video that was taken down from YouTube.
And why would a shampoo advert use the audio from a Formula 1 crash in which someone dies? Who could possibly think that was a good idea (given that any production company making such an advert would have access to pretty much an unlimited amount of stock sound effects)? It all sounds very unlikely to me.
I would link to it, but I can't.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:29 pm
by Mark James
Rhys Benjamin wrote:I would link to it, but I can't.
Can you at least link us to the shampoo advert so we can hear what you're on about. I doubt I'll care either way though.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 9:30 pm
by Gavin Chipper
I think it's this. There's no crash sound. I think Rhys might just mean the racing noises were from the same race. But even if the "proof" video no longer exists, you could at least tell us the way in which the video enlightened you to this fact.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:06 pm
by Ian Volante
I really doubt they'd pick a random race from 1994 when there'd be much better quality from more recently, plus shampoo can't drive, what?

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:42 pm
by Charlie Reams
Rhys Benjamin wrote: I would link to it, but I can't.
Well, you've certainly convinced me!

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 9:09 am
by Mark James
Gavin Chipper wrote:I think it's this. There's no crash sound. I think Rhys might just mean the racing noises were from the same race. But even if the "proof" video no longer exists, you could at least tell us the way in which the video enlightened you to this fact.
Cheers Gavin. Sounds like standard stock noises to me. How is one supposed to differentiate between the sounds of one formula 1 race from another anyway? They all sound exactly the same. Not to mention that they all look pretty much the same too. What a rubbish sport.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:16 am
by Ian Volante
Mark James wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:I think it's this. There's no crash sound. I think Rhys might just mean the racing noises were from the same race. But even if the "proof" video no longer exists, you could at least tell us the way in which the video enlightened you to this fact.
Cheers Gavin. Sounds like standard stock noises to me. How is one supposed to differentiate between the sounds of one formula 1 race from another anyway? They all sound exactly the same. Not to mention that they all look pretty much the same too. What a rubbish sport.
I bet Ecclestone's a tory.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:05 pm
by Rhys Benjamin
Ian Volante wrote:
Mark James wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:I think it's this. There's no crash sound. I think Rhys might just mean the racing noises were from the same race. But even if the "proof" video no longer exists, you could at least tell us the way in which the video enlightened you to this fact.
Cheers Gavin. Sounds like standard stock noises to me. How is one supposed to differentiate between the sounds of one formula 1 race from another anyway? They all sound exactly the same. Not to mention that they all look pretty much the same too. What a rubbish sport.
I bet Ecclestone's a tory.
The Tories were a completely different party in the 1880's! The Conservatives and the Tories were 2 different parties¬!

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:24 pm
by Ian Volante
Rhys Benjamin wrote:
Ian Volante wrote:
Mark James wrote: Cheers Gavin. Sounds like standard stock noises to me. How is one supposed to differentiate between the sounds of one formula 1 race from another anyway? They all sound exactly the same. Not to mention that they all look pretty much the same too. What a rubbish sport.
I bet Ecclestone's a tory.
The Tories were a completely different party in the 1880's! The Conservatives and the Tories were 2 different parties¬!
You do know he's older than Monty Burns?

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 4:18 pm
by Liam Tiernan
Ian Volante wrote:
Rhys Benjamin wrote: The Tories were a completely different party in the 1880's! The Conservatives and the Tories were 2 different parties¬!
You do know he's older than Monty Burns?
I've always suspected there was something odd about Rhys.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:54 am
by Rhys Benjamin
Liam Tiernan wrote:
Ian Volante wrote:
Rhys Benjamin wrote: The Tories were a completely different party in the 1880's! The Conservatives and the Tories were 2 different parties¬!
You do know he's older than Monty Burns?
I've always suspected there was something odd about Rhys.
Monty Burns must be under 13 then.