c4countdown

Today sees Marcus and Scott take each other on in the last quarter of series 63 to win the right to take on myself in tomorrows' episode.

All games so far have gone as expected, but with Marcus and Scott being #4 and #5 respectively and being at a very similar standard on apterous at the time of recording, this one is too difficult to call, looking like it should be one of the closest games of the series.

I am sure James will be round with some stats later.

JackHurst wrote:I am sure James will be round with some stats later.

As promised:

Firstly, No.4 Seed Marcus Hares - 8 Wins, 834 Points
Highest Score: 116 vs. James Bradley (2nd Game)
Lowest Score: 87 vs. Steve Turvey (1st Game)
9's Achieved: 3/7
Total Points/Max/%: 834/1017 (82%)
Letters Points/Max/%: 572/710 (81%)
Numbers Points/Max/%: 202/227 (89%)
Conundrum Points/Max/%: 60/80 (75%)

Secondly, No.5 Seed Scott Gillies - 8 Wins, 810 Points
Highest Score: 126 vs. Judith Hunt (7th Game)
Lowest Score: 87 vs. Kevin Quinn (6th Game)
9's Achieved: 2/7
Total Points/Max/%: 810/1035 (78%)
Letters Points/Max/%: 555/715 (78%)
Numbers Points/Max/%: 225/240 (94%)
Conundrum Points/Max/%: 30/80 (38%)

Am also looking forward to this battle of the Apto-titans. Who will win "The Street Fighter" or "The Jamestown Jacobite"

Oliver will recap later.

I prefer Scott "The Darkie's Delight" Gillies.

Prepare for the battle of the apterites!

Is it me or are Marcus's glasses new?

I think they are - and I got 'numen' towards the end.

Well played, lads, very good game, best of the quarters.

I thought Marcus would win, if he had control of the two numbers games and vice-versa for Scott. Heh now I understand that quip about "who would spot EYESORE?" A while back

This was a fantastic game, really good to watch in the studio. Felt great for Marcus, but also a bit shit for Scott as he came so close.

Also, I used to think that the amount of comments on the spoilers thread for an episode were proportional to how good it was, but thats clearly not the case. Where are all the comments about how good it was?

As the text commentator on Football Manager says: "What a game!!!"

Really good contest this, kind of makes me wish I hadn't found out the result beforehand. Great play from both of you.

JackHurst wrote:Also, I used to think that the amount of comments on the spoilers thread for an episode were proportional to how good it was, but thats clearly not the case. Where are all the comments about how good it was?

Well, I'll add one - this was a superb match - well done to both. Marcus reminded me of how he kept calm through his run - if I remember correctly he did get behind in that once or twice, but never lost his cool, and came up with one or two crucial words at just the right time to prevail each time.

Excellent contest - EYESORE was a superb spot. What were you fishing for in that round Scott as you went for 5 vowels playing right into Marcus' hands I'm sure

Unlucky to lose as I thought you had won it when you led all the way.

Lastly, what a brilliant scramble; LARGEBAPS. I think it was Damian's way of taking the piss out of Scott's moobs.

Kirk Bevins wrote:Excellent contest - EYESORE was a superb spot. What were you fishing for in that round Scott as you went for 5 vowels playing right into Marcus' hands I'm sure

SEERAGE?

Kirk Bevins wrote:Lastly, what a brilliant scramble; LARGEBAPS. I think it was Damian's way of taking the piss out of Scott's moobs.

He said something about being inspired by someone in the office who was wearing a revealing top. No doubt a joke.

Kirk Bevins wrote:Excellent contest - EYESORE was a superb spot. What were you fishing for in that round Scott as you went for 5 vowels playing right into Marcus' hands I'm sure

Unlucky to lose as I thought you had won it when you led all the way.

Lastly, what a brilliant scramble; LARGEBAPS. I think it was Damian's way of taking the piss out of Scott's moobs.

i was fishing for agarose and it went all tits up when it didnt appear lol

Ryan Taylor wrote: He said something about being inspired by someone in the office who was wearing a revealing top. No doubt a joke.

And GRASPABLE makes sense too. Wow, this is even better than UGLYHINTS.

Edit: Wow, GRASPABLE isn't an apto conundrum either - that surprises me.

That was a phenomenal game. Very high standard, as to be expected.

Very unlucky, Scott. Very good performance and to be ahead all the way, bar the end must be gut-wrenching.

But, well done, Marcus, for masterminding a great comeback. Your semi-final with Jack tomoroow should be a treat as well.

FORGOES in round 1, TOOTER in round 4, CUTTLES in round 7 and ANDISOLS in round 12.

1st Numbers 881 (Closest Possible): (((75 x 4) + (50 / 25)) x 3) - 25

These final 3 matches are going to be awesome, methinks.

Kirk Bevins wrote:

Ryan Taylor wrote: He said something about being inspired by someone in the office who was wearing a revealing top. No doubt a joke.

And GRASPABLE makes sense too. Wow, this is even better than UGLYHINTS.

Edit: Wow, GRASPABLE isn't an apto conundrum either - that surprises me.

none of the finals have apto conundrums Kirk, which was planned by Dam

Scott Gillies wrote: none of the finals have apto conundrums Kirk, which was planned by Dam

Eoin's QF conundrum is on apterous and Eoin solved it in 2.5 seconds the time he solved it.

First numbers game: Deja vu?

http://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_4127

Johnny Canuck wrote:First numbers game: Deja vu?

http://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_4127

Pretty amazing.

Kirk Bevins wrote:

Scott Gillies wrote: none of the finals have apto conundrums Kirk, which was planned by Dam

Eoin's QF conundrum is on apterous and Eoin solved it in 2.5 seconds the time he solved it.

A few days ago Jack mentioned that one of the finals conundrums was inadvertently used in the last heat game (and it isn't an apterous conundrum). Maybe Eoin got the one that was meant to be for that game?

Graeme Cole wrote:

Kirk Bevins wrote:

Scott Gillies wrote: none of the finals have apto conundrums Kirk, which was planned by Dam

Eoin's QF conundrum is on apterous and Eoin solved it in 2.5 seconds the time he solved it.

A few days ago Jack mentioned that one of the finals conundrums was inadvertently used in the last heat game (and it isn't an apterous conundrum). Maybe Eoin got the one that was meant to be for that game?

Yeah, Damian mentioned this to me.

Cheers for the nice comments guys - I want to say it was a really memorable game but I could barely remember anything about it until I watched it back tonight. This was always going to be a close game and I had a lot of luck with it - first off I won the toss so it meant I could have two choices at the numbers (which Scott is better at), and secondly both 8's that I assumed were slightly risky (INDEXERS and SUNDIALS) Jeff went to Scott for the declaration first, I could very well have declared 7's if I had been asked first.

It was a great game though and congratulations to Scott on giving a great account.

Next stop, Jack Hurst... *gulp*!

Scott Gillies wrote:

Kirk Bevins wrote: none of the finals have apto conundrums Kirk, which was planned by Dam

I wouldnt be so sure about that.

Really excellent game today; it's just a shame one of you had to lose.
(The latter thought being something of a recurring theme in these finals.)

This Morning's telegraph was

Basically:

""large baps" was revealed as the final round on yesterday's show... further embarrassment was caused when Marcus Hares declared "GRASPABLE"."

Rhys Benjamin wrote:This Morning's telegraph was

Basically:

""large baps" was revealed as the final round on yesterday's show... further embarrassment was caused when Marcus Hares declared "GRASPABLE"."

This sort of filth wouldn't happen were it not for Europe, the nanny state, and political correctness gone mad.

Rear Admiral Charles Bletchley-Cholmondeley (retd.)

Just been catching up with these games - excellent game. Both played very well and could have gone either way.

Johnny Canuck wrote:First numbers game: Deja vu?

http://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_4127

I think I suggested once that because of the limitations in the combinations of 4-large, if someone was sufficiently dedicated they might be able to learn all the solutions in advance. Not sure it would actually be doable though.

Gavin Chipper wrote:Just been catching up with these games - excellent game. Both played very well and could have gone either way.

Johnny Canuck wrote:First numbers game: Deja vu?

http://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_4127

I think I suggested once that because of the limitations in the combinations of 4-large, if someone was sufficiently dedicated they might be able to learn all the solutions in advance. Not sure it would actually be doable though.

Even if it was possible, it would be far more effective to actually practise and get good enough to spot most solutions than trying to learn them all and recall them from memory.

There are 55 possible possible combinations of small, and 899 targets giving 49445 possible 4 large rounds. There are a few that you can get to using just the 4 large, but that's a small proportion. Learning the tricks that help you tap into certain areas of the target region is the best place to start, for example the 302/203/154, 937.5 and 625+-50/100. Once you've learned and practised these, a lot of rounds become a lot easier if you have faith that the method works and don't spend half the time of the round convincing yourself that it works. There's also some nice acrobatics you can do with a 5 or 10 in the selection, but AFAIK I am the only person on apterous that uses this.

JackHurst wrote:

Gavin Chipper wrote:Just been catching up with these games - excellent game. Both played very well and could have gone either way.

Johnny Canuck wrote:First numbers game: Deja vu?

http://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_4127

I think I suggested once that because of the limitations in the combinations of 4-large, if someone was sufficiently dedicated they might be able to learn all the solutions in advance. Not sure it would actually be doable though.

Even if it was possible, it would be far more effective to actually practise and get good enough to spot most solutions than trying to learn them all and recall them from memory.

There are 55 possible possible combinations of small, and 899 targets giving 49445 possible 4 large rounds. There are a few that you can get to using just the 4 large, but that's a small proportion. Learning the tricks that help you tap into certain areas of the target region is the best place to start, for example the 302/203/154, 937.5 and 625+-50/100. Once you've learned and practised these, a lot of rounds become a lot easier if you have faith that the method works and don't spend half the time of the round convincing yourself that it works. There's also some nice acrobatics you can do with a 5 or 10 in the selection, but AFAIK I am the only person on apterous that uses this.

Yep, I might join you on the 4-large scene quite soon.