Page 1 of 1

David Mitchell

Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:01 pm
by Julian Fell
Has he been in DC yet? If not, is there any news as to if/when he might be on?

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:27 pm
by M. George Quinn
I think I remember Damian saying that they asked him but he thought we were all twits or something like that.

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:40 pm
by Charlie Reams
M. George Quinn wrote:I think I remember Damian saying that they asked him but he thought we were all twits or something like that.
I think I remember Damian saying:
Damian Eadie wrote:Thanks to those who asked us to get David Mitchell, we're on the case but it might not be until June, due to his current commitments.
I have a pretty good memory.

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:08 pm
by Damian E
No joy so far. Several new guests lined up for Series 59 though. :)

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:17 pm
by M. George Quinn
Damian E wrote: We have tried David Mitchell, but he thought you were all c****, so no joy.
See, my memory isn't that bad. It even has a profanity filter.

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 2:18 am
by Benji Hanks
Damian E wrote:No joy so far. Several new guests lined up for Series 59 though. :)

i thought you were keeping me a secret?

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:57 am
by Julian Fell
On the subject of guests in general - just seen on Ceefax - Phil Hammond on this week! Brilliant, nice one Damian and YTV, that makes up for not getting David Mitchell (yet).

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:02 am
by Joseph Bolas
Julian wrote:On the subject of guests in general - just seen on Ceefax - Phil Hammond on this week! Brilliant, nice one Damian and YTV, that makes up for not getting David Mitchell (yet).
They're ending the series on Dr Hammond?. At least the quality of the contestants will make up for a poor DC choice :D.

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:28 am
by Lucy Gowers
The real reason why David Mitchell is playing hard to get: http://youtube.com/watch?v=1WaCfFtCsbw

Possibly....

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:06 pm
by John Tuttle
Great to hear about the several new guests, I always enjoy seeing new people on. Most of the frequently-appearing guests are very good, but I like the variety so I think one stint per series should probably be enough.

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:13 pm
by John Tuttle
Has David Mitchell actually said he doesn't want to do it, or is there still a chance?

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:35 pm
by Derek Hazell
Not sure you'd want David Mitchell anymore after this comment on The Big Fat Quiz of the Year 2009 . . . or even if he'd actually want to do it:

Talking about the fourth plinth, one of the panellists suggested that the idea of featuring members of the public doing their own thing on there should be continued permanently, and Mitchell replied "When we get bored of it, that's the moment to push on through. That's what they did with Countdown!"

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:00 pm
by Matthew Green
Although it must be added that he carried that show on his own. If it wasn't for him, I dont think many people could have put up with those dreadful unfunny egomaniacs and Jimmy Carr's appalling laugh.

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:24 pm
by Charlie Reams
Derek Hazell wrote:Not sure you'd want David Mitchell anymore after this comment on The Big Fat Quiz of the Year 2009 . . . or even if he'd actually want to do it:

Talking about the fourth plinth, one of the panellists suggested that the idea of featuring members of the public doing their own thing on there should be continued permanently, and Mitchell replied "When we get bored of it, that's the moment to push on through. That's what they did with Countdown!"
I thought that was well funny.

Re: David Mitchell

Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:36 pm
by DANNI WOODHOUSE
Lucy Gowers wrote:The real reason why David Mitchell is playing hard to get: http://youtube.com/watch?v=1WaCfFtCsbw

Possibly....
that video has gone because of **********ing copyright issues - so what was it ?