Page 1 of 1
Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:34 pm
by James Robinson
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:24 pm
by Ryan Taylor
I wasn't mad at Lee for winning, I was just hugely disappointed by Peter. I was left feeling empty.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:25 pm
by Matt Morrison
Ryan Taylor wrote:I wasn't mad at Lee for winning, I was just hugely disappointed by Peter. I was left feeling empty.
A bit like Badcock after Peter lost his right to make sweet octochamp love to her.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:27 pm
by Michael Wallace
Matt Morrison wrote:Ryan Taylor wrote:I wasn't mad at Lee for winning, I was just hugely disappointed by Peter. I was left feeling empty.
A bit like Badcock after Peter lost his right to make sweet octochamp love to her.
I wonder how many people in the world have had sex with an octochamp. (Bearing in mind it doesn't count if they had sex with them
before they became a massive Countdown nerd.)
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:37 pm
by Jon O'Neill
Michael Wallace wrote:Matt Morrison wrote:Ryan Taylor wrote:I wasn't mad at Lee for winning, I was just hugely disappointed by Peter. I was left feeling empty.
A bit like Badcock after Peter lost his right to make sweet octochamp love to her.
I wonder how many people in the world have had sex with an octochamp. (Bearing in mind it doesn't count if they had sex with them
before they became a massive Countdown nerd.)
I'm sure we could get in touch with all of them and find out how many each octo has banged. Problem is people who've slept with more than one octochamp.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:42 pm
by Jon Corby
Jon O'Neill wrote:Problem is people who've slept with more than one octochamp.
I've slept with four octochamps.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:48 pm
by Matt Morrison
Jon Corby wrote:Jon O'Neill wrote:Problem is people who've slept with more than one octochamp.
I've slept with four octochamps.
I'd presume this was some kind of masturbation joke but your use of such a small number just makes it frankly impossible.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:49 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Jon O'Neill wrote:I'm sure we could get in touch with all of them and find out how many each octo has banged. Problem is people who've slept with more than one octochamp.
Cue the return of a Jeffrey Burgin post. (and Ralph Gillions no doubt)
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:50 pm
by Michael Wallace
Ryan Taylor wrote:Jon O'Neill wrote:I'm sure we could get in touch with all of them and find out how many each octo has banged. Problem is people who've slept with more than one octochamp.
Cue the return of a Jeffrey Burgin post. (and Ralph Gillions no doubt)
I've only just realised that that thread title implies there's some sort of fisting going on

Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:59 pm
by James Robinson
Ryan Taylor wrote:I wasn't mad at Lee for winning, I was just hugely disappointed by Peter. I was left feeling empty.
I was personally worrying about the fatigue factor. I can't really answer having got nowhere near close to being an octochamp, but how drained do you become when doing an 8th show
Just thinking about the schedule probability, Peter must have done his 8 shows in a period of not much longer than 24 hours.

Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:20 pm
by Ralph Gillions
Ryan Taylor wrote:Jon O'Neill wrote:I'm sure we could get in touch with all of them and find out how many each octo has banged. Problem is people who've slept with more than one octochamp.
Cue the return of a Jeffrey Burgin post. (and Ralph Gillions no doubt)
Coo-eee. Here I am. I appreciate that you understand my special interests Ryan.
I am unwavering.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:21 pm
by Howard Somerset
Michael Wallace wrote:I wonder how many people in the world have had sex with an octochamp.
Would you include octochamps having sex with themselves in this count?
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:23 pm
by Michael Wallace
Howard Somerset wrote:Michael Wallace wrote:I wonder how many people in the world have had sex with an octochamp.
Would you include octochamps having sex with themselves in this count?
Oh, they'd count for double

Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:32 pm
by Innis Carson
Ooh. Guess it wasn't a pseudonym after all.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:32 pm
by Oliver Garner
APOMICT
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:34 pm
by Kirk Bevins
DARKSOME as a beater.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:40 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Jon O'Neill wrote:
I'm sure we could get in touch with all of them and find out how many each octo has banged.
What if you genuinely can't remember?
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:46 pm
by Matt Morrison
Octochamp right? Keeping it real for the SEO massive.
Last time I took notice of Daniel he was around 1100-1200 ish I think. He rolls on 1500s now and his performances are great.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:49 pm
by Matt Morrison
Bejesus, I've not seen anyone get that close to a monitor since that time that zookeeper picked up that lizard. Awesome.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:50 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Is there something you weren't telling us?
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:52 pm
by Matt Morrison
Ooh. So close to QUAALUDES. Oh, which for some reason isn't valid anyway.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:52 pm
by Matt Morrison
Kirk Bevins wrote:Jon O'Neill wrote:I'm sure we could get in touch with all of them and find out how many each octo has banged.
What if you genuinely can't remember?
Is there something you weren't telling us?
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:06 pm
by Matt Morrison
Pretty surprising fuck up on the last numbers then, all things considered.
Technically honest too, considering that 100x2 still gave several options for finishing it off, like adding 6*(3-1) before multiplying by the other 2.
All told good then. I'll stick on the octochamp prediction, depending on forthcoming apterites of course.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:11 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Quality debut, Daniel. I was impressed by your apterous performances and you've taken it to the big stage too. Well done.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:31 pm
by Daniel Pati
Hey
Thanks for the kind words. I'm honestly not that serious in real life! It must have just been nerves. And yes, everyone took the piss that I looked like an old man doing a crossword. I think I need glasses.
Hope this isn't spoilerific but something quite funny happens on Monday's episode. Well funny to me, as I have the mind of a 12 year old schoolboy.
Dan
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:37 pm
by Ralph Gillions
Congratulations on your smashing win today Dan. Most impressive performance.
.....and congratulations on your first post in this forum.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:41 pm
by Eoin Monaghan
Hi Daniel

Glad you finally joined.
I thought you were brilliant today and my dad came in the room and asked if that was your first show, I told him it was and he said you seemed very confident.
Hopefully you can emulate today's success and go on and win the 8!

Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:05 pm
by Matt Morrison
I don't wanna take the piss Eoin, but you make all that fuss about the spoiler James posted and then you go and make a post of your own that clearly refers to the result of at least your first show? I mean, seriously!?
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:11 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Daniel Pati wrote:Hope this isn't spoilerific but something quite funny happens on Monday's episode. Well funny to me, as I have the mind of a 12 year old schoolboy.
For fuck's sake. I didn't want to read about Monday's spoilers in the Friday spoiler thread.

Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:12 pm
by Eoin Monaghan
Matt Morrison wrote:I don't wanna take the piss Eoin, but you make all that fuss about the spoiler James posted and then you go and make a post of your own that clearly refers to the result of at least your first show? I mean, seriously!?
Okay, edited. However, I didn't think it was very spoilery as it doesn't really give any result away.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:23 pm
by Charlie Reams
My very strong advice to people who've seen anything that hasn't yet been broadcast is: shut the fuck up. It's much easier to spoiler people (or make them think they've been spoilered) than you think. Just don't say anything. Seriously.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:26 pm
by James Robinson
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Is there something you weren't telling us?
Not quite.
A few weeks ago I was on Apterous playing a match and it was against the person who is going to be challenger this coming Monday (he just told me straight away that he was). He said he played against a guy called Dan who told him about Apterous, so I tried to work out which Dan it was. After trying to remember as many as possible, I still had no joy, mainly because I didn't think about lengthening Dan to Daniel.
Then a couple of weeks later, someone on Apterous said that Daniel was on the show soon, but I had not enough proof to justify saying if he was on or not.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:44 pm
by Ryan Taylor
James Robinson wrote:Kirk Bevins wrote:
Is there something you weren't telling us?
Not quite.
A few weeks ago I was on Apterous playing a match and it was against the person who is going to be challenger this coming Monday (he just told me straight away that he was). He said he played against a guy called Dan who told him about Apterous, so I tried to work out which Dan it was. After trying to remember as many as possible, I still had no joy, mainly because I didn't think about lengthening Dan to Daniel.
Then a couple of weeks later, someone on Apterous said that Daniel was on the show soon, but I had not enough proof to justify saying if he was on or not.
Didn't you think to ask this challenger on Monday what Daniel's surname was. It's only 4 pissing letters long!!!
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:08 pm
by James Robinson
Ryan Taylor wrote:Didn't you think to ask this challenger on Monday what Daniel's surname was. It's only 4 pissing letters long!!!
Yeah, he said he couldn't remember.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:25 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Ryan Taylor wrote:Didn't you think to ask this challenger on Monday what Daniel's surname was. It's only 4 pissing letters long!!!
But James didn't know it was only four letters long, so didn't think to ask what his surname was.
Re: Spoilers For Friday September 3rd 2010
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:43 pm
by Edward McCullagh
Excellent performance Daniel - great to finally see you on the show
