Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:16 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Peter might become an octochamp today and I'm pretty sure most of us want to see this happen. He has been bloody brilliant from start to finish on his run so hopefully he can cap it off in style. Yesterday he absolutely humiliated that taxi driver anouncing 8's when he had 5's and the funny thing was, I didn't feel sorry for him cos I was just all like "yeyyy go Peter you monster...wooooo".

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:17 pm
by Matt Morrison
Peter's on the list of people who Badcock is allowed to shag.

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:03 pm
by Jon Corby
Matt Morrison wrote:Peter's on the list of people who Badcock is allowed to shag.
I bet he's on yours too, you big bumder.

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:26 pm
by Michael Wallace
I haven't seen any of this guy's shows. If I were to watch one, which would you recommend for me to get the best feel for his awesome-ness?

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:33 pm
by tomrowell
Michael Wallace wrote:I haven't seen any of this guy's shows. If I were to watch one, which would you recommend for me to get the best feel for his awesome-ness?
not today's ;)

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:54 pm
by Chris Davies
I did (75+9)*(7+5)-50-5 for the second numbers to get it exactly. Watching on +1 so I'm not sure whether Rachel will solve it after the break.

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:09 pm
by Eoin Monaghan
Aww, really annoyed he lost, what a really pleasant guy.

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:55 pm
by Hugh Binnie
If Facebook had a dislike button, I would ask Charlie to add one to this forum so that I could dislike today's episode. :(

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:25 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:09 pm
by JackHurst
:(

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:24 pm
by James Robinson
:( :cry: :( :cry: Am well sad doing the recap at the moment. Almost as sad as when I did Jonathan Wynn's game 2 months ago.

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:56 pm
by Matt Morrison
Hands off my girlfriend Peter, it'll never be the same.

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:25 pm
by Oliver Garner
The challenger had a dog called Howie. What kind of name is this? I bet its surname's Mandel. Peter was so much better.

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:54 pm
by Innis Carson
Ugh. Just checked here to make sure Peter had won before I watched this on 4oD, not going to now.

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:06 am
by Ben Hunter
A tragedy. Well done to matey boy though.

And did anyone else notice Rachel Dixon in the audience?

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:58 am
by Matt Morrison
Ben Hunter wrote:A tragedy. Well done to matey boy though.

And did anyone else notice Rachel Dixon in the audience?
Josh Hurst, and I, for two. Good amount of camera time.

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 8:03 am
by Jon Corby
Ben Hunter wrote:A tragedy. Well done to matey boy though.

And did anyone else notice Rachel Dixon in the audience?
Who's Rachel Dixon? The fit redhead behind the conundrum-getter?

Re: Spoilers for 2nd September 2010 (AND ALSO SEP 1st)

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:58 pm
by Robert Baxter
Ryan Taylor wrote:Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!