Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Tuesday 1st June 2010

Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:37 pm
by Douglas Wilson
Well it's a new month and for many of us the start of a new working week. :|

We do however have the same Champion as yesterday in the shape of Dominic Travers, do we know if he's any relation to the great Conor Travers :?: Regardless he'll be hoping to make it a 4 wins today and if he holds on til the end of the week he'll be gracing the series final. If he makes it the full set next Monday we'll be describing Series 62 Octochamps like London buses :!:

I have no idea who does Tuesday recaps and have no desire to find out so it will be a nice suprise for those of you that way inclined later :D :!: :ugeek:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 1st June 2010

Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:45 pm
by Liam Tiernan
SUPERNAL/PURSLANE rd 6 as equallers

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 1st June 2010

Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:57 pm
by Mark Kudlowski
CHARINESS in round 8 ?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 1st June 2010

Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:04 pm
by Liam Tiernan
Mark Kudlowski wrote:CHARINESS in round 8 ?
Invalid, unfortunately. Although it has been tried before:http://www.apterous.org/lexplorer.php?word=chariness
RACINESS as another equaller.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 1st June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:50 am
by John Brackstone
vexate as a beater

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 1st June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:48 am
by Charlie Reams
John Brackstone wrote:vexate as a beater
'Fraid not (please check before you post).

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 1st June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 5:10 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Charlie Reams wrote:
John Brackstone wrote:vexate as a beater
'Fraid not (please check before you post).
It vexates me when people don't.

Edit - although Lexplorer isn't perfect.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 1st June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:06 pm
by James Robinson
Douglas Wilson wrote:We do however have the same Champion as yesterday in the shape of Dominic Travers, do we know if he's any relation to the great Conor Travers :?:
He says no.

Easier 3rd numbers: (50 x 6) - (9 x 8) = 228