Page 1 of 1
Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 1:05 pm
by James Robinson
Right, so the new champion has been crowned, and his name is James (not a bad name
), but will the King's Cross signalman stay on the right track or go off the rails today
/
- Take your pick.
I'll be back later with the recap.
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 2:33 pm
by Marc Meakin
BALLSIER for a contestant beater in round 2.
PROTEINS round 4.
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 2:41 pm
by Marc Meakin
first numbers (100 x 4) - 75 - 3 x (50/25) = 644 (took 2 minutes though)
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 2:54 pm
by Michael Wallace
2nd numbers - (100-9)*8 - 25 + 3*4 works, right?
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 2:54 pm
by Kirk Bevins
(25x8+9-4)x3+100 for round 10.
I was quite impressed with this.
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 3:07 pm
by Michael Wallace
Wow, a level 9 conundrum today. Hardcore.
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 3:13 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Michael Wallace wrote:Wow, a level 9 conundrum today. Hardcore.
Yeah, I got it on about 35 seconds. Surprisingly difficult I thought. I think many people offer UNDERTEST but since this was the scramble, I was stumped.
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 3:14 pm
by Josh Hurst
Initially Dom declared WANKER in round 11, so it had to be shot again. LOL!
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 3:28 pm
by Michael Wallace
Josh Hurst wrote:Initially Dom declared WANKER in round 11, so it had to be shot again. LOL!
Ha, I did wonder about that. Good stuff
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 4:25 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Michael Wallace wrote:2nd numbers - (100-9)*8 - 25 + 3*4 works, right?
I hope so cos that's what I did.
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 6:09 pm
by James Robinson
Kirk Bevins wrote:Michael Wallace wrote:Wow, a level 9 conundrum today. Hardcore.
Yeah, I got it on about 35 seconds. Surprisingly difficult I thought. I think many people offer UNDERTEST but since this was the scramble, I was stumped.
Yeah, I was so happy with myself with getting RESTUNTED after 5 secs. What a fool I am
Having said that I was also proud of myself with GENIPAP too. What a shocker
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 7:57 pm
by Jim Treloar
Round 11, yes Josh, I was also there. I recall the take took quite a time, Jeff also got involved making some comment about it jumping out, then made some remark about, sorry, very unprofessional. Just as well it was easy to change one letter without making any difference to the score.
Kirk - it was me who had a quick word with you yesterday at the studio (in the loo, but no one read anything into that!), didn't actually introduce myself as the name wouldn't have meant anything to you, but nice to meet you.
Jim Treloar
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 27th 2010
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 10:37 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Jim Treloar wrote:
Kirk - it was me who had a quick word with you yesterday at the studio (in the loo, but no one read anything into that!), didn't actually introduce myself as the name wouldn't have meant anything to you, but nice to meet you.
Jim Treloar
Ah nice to meet you. I did recognise the name, yes, so you should have said!