Page 1 of 1
Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:15 am
by Douglas Wilson
Well the climax of Series 62 will be recorded today and tomorrow and a select group of lucky people are in Manchester watching it unfold.
The rest of us will have to make do with the latest prelim edition of Series 62 which features 3 time winner Nicki who may or may not be back recording today. She'll definitely need to win today and tomorrow to stand any chance and the long awaited second octochamp party of the series could be next Monday.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:31 pm
by Marc Meakin
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:31 pm
by Andrew Hulme
TOURACO Rd 2
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:45 pm
by Marc Meakin
UNAVOWED was there for 8.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:47 pm
by Kirk Bevins
FOSSAE for 6 in round 7.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:48 pm
by Matt Morrison
Marc Meakin wrote:
This is way more annoying than leaving whatever was there intact. Probably. I wouldn't know cos I didn't get to see it obviously, but I'm annoyed now gard damnit.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:48 pm
by Kirk Bevins
RORTIEST for 8 in round 8 for a beater.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:51 pm
by Marc Meakin
Matt Morrison wrote:Marc Meakin wrote:
This is way more annoying than leaving whatever was there intact. Probably. I wouldn't know cos I didn't get to see it obviously, but I'm annoyed now gard damnit.
Wanted to delete the post but couldn't.
To put you out of your misery, I put down MOLERAT but it is only a CSW word.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:52 pm
by Matt Morrison
Marc Meakin wrote:Matt Morrison wrote:Marc Meakin wrote:
This is way more annoying than leaving whatever was there intact. Probably. I wouldn't know cos I didn't get to see it obviously, but I'm annoyed now gard damnit.
Wanted to delete the post but couldn't.
To put you out of your misery, I put down MOLERAT but it is only a CSW word.
Thanks Marc! Be a love and leave it next time

I'm sure I've seen you doing plenty of "would have been XXXXXX there but it's CSW only" posts before, so dunno why this one got culled.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:02 pm
by John Brackstone
opencast for a dc-equaller
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:07 pm
by Marc Meakin
Fantastic contest today.
Well done Nikki for acheiving your half octochampdom.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:11 pm
by Ray Folwell
Slightly simpler version of the 3rd numbers : (6x25+2) x (10-6)
I do hope Rachel gets well soon

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:19 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Ray Folwell wrote:Slightly simpler version of the 3rd numbers : (6x25+2) x (10-6)
I do hope Rachel gets well soon

The contestants virtually did this. They said, essentially, 25x6x4+10 for their 2 away. They wanted to do 25x6x4+8 which is 25x6x4+2x4, which is (25x6+2)x4, which is what Rachel did. Job done.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:27 pm
by Matt Morrison
Kirk Bevins wrote:Ray Folwell wrote:Slightly simpler version of the 3rd numbers : (6x25+2) x (10-6)
I do hope Rachel gets well soon

The contestants virtually did this. They said, essentially, 25x6x4+10 for their 2 away. They wanted to do 25x6x4+8 which is 25x6x4+2x4, which is (25x6+2)x4, which is what Rachel did. Job done.
Sometimes I get frustrated when Rachel's method is very very similar to the contestants and just involves splitmultiplicationising it, yet she presents it in a totally different-looking way.
I think usually the contestants don't see the link at all and it's a shame Rachel doesn't get another 10 seconds just to explain how they could have developed their method just slightly to get it right.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:59 pm
by Ben Hunter
Marc Meakin wrote:Well done Nikki for acheiving your half octochampdom.
Can Huddersfield win tonight?
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:05 pm
by Peter Mabey
Ray Folwell wrote:Slightly simpler version of the 3rd numbers : (6x25+2) x (10-6)
I do hope Rachel gets well soon

I did it quite differently: (25+6X6)X10-2

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:48 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Peter Mabey wrote:Ray Folwell wrote:Slightly simpler version of the 3rd numbers : (6x25+2) x (10-6)
I do hope Rachel gets well soon

I did it quite differently: (25+6X6)X10-2

Mabey I did it like that too. In fact I definitely did.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:57 pm
by Jon Corby
I did (6*5-6)*25+10-2.
Well done Nicki!
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:25 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Nice one Nikki! Great steal on the conundrum woohoo!!
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:31 pm
by David Williams
Matt Morrison wrote:Sometimes I get frustrated when Rachel's method is very very similar to the contestants and just involves splitmultiplicationising it, yet she presents it in a totally different-looking way.
I think usually the contestants don't see the link at all and it's a shame Rachel doesn't get another 10 seconds just to explain how they could have developed their method just slightly to get it right.
Agreed. I can appreciate that Rachel's got a few things to think about at the same time, while not forgetting her own solution. I can also see it could look like trying to make contestants look foolish, but Susie often does something similar ("You'll kick yourself") without upsetting anyone. It would be good to illustrate the tricks of the trade for viewers at home in this way.