Moderator: James Robinson
Also should she get far enough, Oli Garner is set to be her second opponent of series 62, so like Jacqui, Jan's run could well be terminated at 5 wins and we'd have to wait ages to see if she makes the finals.James Robinson wrote:Jan is still the champ. Interestingly, she seems to be doing a Jackie Baker, by having 4 wins at the end of the series and having to carry on in the next series. Well, we'll know if that happens if she wins today.
James Robinson wrote:Well, we have reached the end of the preliminaries of Series 61, well by the end of the day we will have anyway.
When Charlie writes equally inspiring stuff, does the Daily Mail Beckham?D Eadie wrote:Inspiring stuff. The Daily Mail beckons.James Robinson wrote:Well, we have reached the end of the preliminaries of Series 61, well by the end of the day we will have anyway.
I haven't given it too much thought to be honest, Douglas. Even now, I'm still undecided.Douglas Wilson wrote:Sorry to take this thread off on a tangent but who would you rather: Jackie or Jan?
That is an inappropriate comment for this forum, especially considering that one or both of these women could read it.Douglas Wilson wrote:Sorry to take this thread off on a tangent but who would you rather: Jackie or Jan?
Yeah good point, I would have to say both at the same time, so as not to offend either.JackHurst wrote:That is an inappropriate comment for this forum, especially considering that one or both of these women could read it.Douglas Wilson wrote:Sorry to take this thread off on a tangent but who would you rather: Jackie or Jan?
As opposed to numerous comments about members of production team/hosting team?JackHurst wrote: That is an inappropriate comment for this forum, especially considering that one or both of these women could read it.
James Robinson wrote:Well, we have reached the end of the preliminaries of Series 61, well by the end of the day we will have anyway.
Jan is still the champ. Interestingly, she seems to be doing a Jackie Baker, by having 4 wins at the end of the series and having to carry on in the next series. Well, we'll know if that happens if she wins today.
After today of course, we'll have the series finals. I think it's still too close to call in terms of who will win the series, but that just adds to the excitement of it all, doesn't it?
How is it inappropriate to ask who you would rather play a game of Countdown with on a Countdown forum?JackHurst wrote:That is an inappropriate comment for this forum, especially considering that one or both of these women could read it.Douglas Wilson wrote:Sorry to take this thread off on a tangent but who would you rather: Jackie or Jan?
I certainly hope not.D Eadie wrote:Inspiring stuff. The Daily Mail beckons.James Robinson wrote:Well, we have reached the end of the preliminaries of Series 61, well by the end of the day we will have anyway.
How is that "taking this thread off at a tangent"?Douglas Wilson wrote:How is it inappropriate to ask who you would rather play a game of Countdown with on a Countdown forum?JackHurst wrote:That is an inappropriate comment for this forum, especially considering that one or both of these women could read it.Douglas Wilson wrote:Sorry to take this thread off on a tangent but who would you rather: Jackie or Jan?
No.Marc Meakin wrote:LOBBIERS?
Oh, but it should be.Kirk Bevins wrote:No.Marc Meakin wrote:LOBBIERS?
No.Marc Meakin wrote:Oh, but it should be.Kirk Bevins wrote:No.Marc Meakin wrote:LOBBIERS?
Sitting next to Kirk inthe audience, I got this... And he didn't!!!Mark Kudlowski wrote:DAINTY ?
You can see my lovely lovely girlfriend Robyn behind the guy answering the conundrum when the camera is close up.Kirk Bevins wrote:Good to see Innis in the audience...might have been others but I just noticed him in the brief few seconds.
Because this thread is to talk about spoilers in today's show, not who you'd rather play at Countdown.Clive Brooker wrote: How is that "taking this thread off at a tangent"?
That's Chris isn't it? What happened to opposites attract?Derek Hazell wrote:
Brilliant, Chris.Chris Davies wrote:TRAITEURS - I honestly can't rememeber whether or not I spotted this in the studio.
I thought I was doing good with TRUSTIER. 
And behind him is Andrew Hulme.Howard Somerset wrote:Looks like Andrew from the previous day's game sitting on the other side of Chris's gf.
A-lolMatt Morrison wrote:That's Chris isn't it? What happened to opposites attract?Derek Hazell wrote:
