Page 1 of 1

Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 12:31 pm
by Derek Hazell
I'm not going to start the spoilers thread today - I'm going to let James Robinson do it just to piss Davy off.

Over to you James . . .

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:11 pm
by Davy Affleck
Derek Hazell wrote:I'm not going to start the spoilers thread today - I'm going to let James Robinson do it just to piss Davy off.

Over to you James . . .

To make it a bit easier simply copy & paste these details then fill in the blanks James

Day

Month

Year

Time

Weather

Champion

Number of wins

Number required for "Octochamp"

Average score

Predicted seeding

Challenger

D.C. Guest

Any other info

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:12 pm
by James Robinson
Thank you, Derek. ;) (and no thank you, Davy.)

Today's match-up could be a critical point in Series 61. Should Tom lose, the quarter-finals will be completed, leaving the last 4 prelims as an intriguing competition to see who will be carryover champion for Series 62.

He's done well so far, just missing out on a good century yesterday. Maybe he has been getting some tips from Kirk :? (Probably not!)

It seems that Jon Gaunt is still dividing opinions among fellow forumites, especially after his talk about food yesterday, but I'm still on the "not so sure" side of things about him. Still, we could always plead to Damian to bring on a journalist who is the direct opposite to Gaunt.

Any suggestions :?:

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:14 pm
by Edwin Mead
How about David Sullivan?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:44 pm
by Marc Meakin
James Robinson wrote:Thank you, Derek. ;) (and no thank you, Davy.)

Today's match-up could be a critical point in Series 61. Should Tom lose, the quarter-finals will be completed, leaving the last 4 prelims as an intriguing competition to see who will be carryover champion for Series 62.

He's done well so far, just missing out on a good century yesterday. Maybe he has been getting some tips from Kirk :? (Probably not!)

It seems that Jon Gaunt is still dividing opinions among fellow forumites, especially after his talk about food yesterday, but I'm still on the "not so sure" side of things about him. Still, we could always plead to Damian to bring on a journalist who is the direct opposite to Gaunt.

Any suggestions :?:
Tony Parsons or Brian Reade.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:46 pm
by Davy Affleck
James Robinson wrote:Thank you, Derek. ;) (and no thank you, Davy.)

Today's match-up could be a critical point in Series 61. Should Tom lose, the quarter-finals will be completed, leaving the last 4 prelims as an intriguing competition to see who will be carryover champion for Series 62.

He's done well so far, just missing out on a good century yesterday. Maybe he has been getting some tips from Kirk :? (Probably not!)

It seems that Jon Gaunt is still dividing opinions among fellow forumites, especially after his talk about food yesterday, but I'm still on the "not so sure" side of things about him. Still, we could always plead to Damian to bring on a journalist who is the direct opposite to Gaunt.

Any suggestions :?:


What's the weather like & who is your team playing this weekend James

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:48 pm
by Phil Reynolds
James Robinson wrote:It seems that Jon Gaunt is still dividing opinions among fellow forumites
Is he? Where are all the posts from people who like him? :?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:54 pm
by Jon Corby
Phil Reynolds wrote:
James Robinson wrote:It seems that Jon Gaunt is still dividing opinions among fellow forumites
Is he? Where are all the posts from people who like him? :?
They're the silent majority that Jon Gaunt speaks on behalf of.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 2:08 pm
by James Robinson
Davy Affleck wrote:What's the weather like & who is your team playing this weekend James
Nice and sunny, for once. My team are going to deck Leeds United on Saturday lunchtime. ;) :) :D

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 2:54 pm
by Marc Meakin
Phil Reynolds wrote:
James Robinson wrote:It seems that Jon Gaunt is still dividing opinions among fellow forumites
Is he? Where are all the posts from people who like him? :?
I think Charlie and Damo kind of defended him. (although I admit it doesn't necessarily mean they like him)

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:36 pm
by Marc Meakin
NEGATORS for round 4

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:40 pm
by Liam Tiernan
WRONGEST is invalid on Lexplorer.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:51 pm
by Marc Meakin
Also RESPITED

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:53 pm
by Liam Tiernan
Marc Meakin wrote:Also RESPITED
and SPIDERED

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:02 pm
by Marc Meakin
QUEAN also

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:05 pm
by Derek Hazell
I'm surprised the "custardy" Marc didn't get TRIFLES.

Also was upset to not see a repeat of Rachel's STD gag in the previous round! :)

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:05 pm
by Liam Tiernan
STIFLERS RD 13

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:07 pm
by Matt Morrison
It's what, sorry, Jeff? Trow-matic? Hmm.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:09 pm
by AnnieHall
I was surprised "Aquae" was disallowed- make it at scrabble all the time. Likewise "Quean" was missed by Susie- a scrabble favourite!
Pleased to say I got "Origami" and "Realists"

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:09 pm
by Niall Seymour
Liam Tiernan wrote:STIFLERS RD 13
And FRAILEST

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:20 pm
by Liam Tiernan
Final numbers (100-(9x3))x6 +25=463 (10 mins though)

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:27 pm
by Kirk Bevins
I was pleased with TRIMIX in round 6 and then DC had ORIGAMI. I always find this an impressive spot, including when James Doohan got it in the finals of Series 60.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:46 pm
by Ryan Taylor
I thought DC were on top form today, dont think they missed much did they? Beat me in pretty much every round..maybe its because I only just woke up..or because I am shit.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:53 pm
by Charlie Reams
Matt Morrison wrote:It's what, sorry, Jeff? Trow-matic? Hmm.
That would be correct, historically speaking. It's a bit weird nowadays though, isn't it?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:57 pm
by Matt Morrison
Charlie Reams wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:It's what, sorry, Jeff? Trow-matic? Hmm.
That would be correct, historically speaking. It's a bit weird nowadays though, isn't it?
Most odd. I guess he was being utterly clever, then. In a way.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:01 pm
by Eoin Monaghan
COSSETED in round 11.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:09 pm
by Richard Priest
Liam Tiernan wrote:
Marc Meakin wrote:Also RESPITED
and SPIDERED

And PRIESTED ;)

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:12 pm
by Karen Pearson
James Robinson wrote:
Davy Affleck wrote:What's the weather like & who is your team playing this weekend James
Nice and sunny, for once. My team are going to deck Leeds United on Saturday lunchtime. ;) :) :D
I beg to disagree! I think your lot are going to get a good hiding!! (Well, I hope so anyway!)

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:29 pm
by Alec Rivers
Matt Morrison wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:It's what, sorry, Jeff? Trow-matic? Hmm.
That would be correct, historically speaking. It's a bit weird nowadays though, isn't it?
Most odd. I guess he was being utterly clever, then. In a way.
The Dutch pronunciation of the diphthong AU is more-or-less like Jeff said it. I think a number of Middle English vowels were much more like Dutch, so this could indeed be an accurate throw-back (as Charlie suggests).

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:44 pm
by Charlie Reams
Alec Rivers wrote: The Dutch pronunciation of the diphthong AU is more-or-less like Jeff said it. I think a number of Middle English vowels were much more like Dutch, so this could indeed be an accurate throw-back (as Charlie suggests).
I actually meant the Greek τραυμα (wound), wherein αυ is pronounced "ow". Don't know much Dutch as such.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:32 pm
by Phil Makepeace
James Robinson wrote: Still, we could always plead to Damian to bring on a journalist who is the direct opposite to Gaunt.

Any suggestions :?:
Simon Barnes, Caitlin Moran and Johann Hari spring to mind.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:40 pm
by James Robinson
Eoin Monaghan wrote:COSSETED in round 11.
Slightly hard to make COSSETED with only 1 E in the selection, Eoin.

Alternative to 1st Numbers:

75 - 10 = 65, 65 / 5 = 13, 13 - 7 = 6, 6 x 100 = 600, 600 - 3 = 597

CATHODE in Round 7
SALTIRES in Round 13

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:12 pm
by Jon Corby
JEFF STELLING HATES DISABLEDS


Jeff: "I hate people that park in disabled spaces"

:o

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:06 am
by Daniel H
"I think we should monitor what our kids look at on the Internet. There are a lot of perverts and conmen on it." - Jon Gaunt, 2009

Why did nobody else think of that? What a trailblazer this guy is!

Hey Jon, show your kids this: Your dad's a fat, smug, annoying wanker.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 8:22 am
by Jon Corby
Daniel H wrote:Hey Jon, show your kids this: Your dad's a fat, smug, annoying wanker.
:(

I'm not fat.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 9:33 am
by Lesley Hines
Daniel H wrote:Your dad's a fat, smug, annoying wanker.
Young man, I'm going to have words with you about language like that. Don't disrespect your father.
(Hang on, are you not my Daniel? :lol:)

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 10:27 am
by John Bosley
Matt Morrison wrote:It's what, sorry, Jeff? Trow-matic? Hmm.
In my experience as many people use the 'trow' as the 'tror'. I use either -it depends, but not sure on what.

Mind you, I always say 'sez' for 'says' :)

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:35 pm
by Alec Rivers
Charlie Reams wrote:
Alec Rivers wrote: The Dutch pronunciation of the diphthong AU is more-or-less like Jeff said it. I think a number of Middle English vowels were much more like Dutch, so this could indeed be an accurate throw-back (as Charlie suggests).
I actually meant the Greek τραυμα (wound), wherein αυ is pronounced "ow". Don't know much Dutch as such.
Oh okay. I thought you might know how similar certain aspects of the two languages were a few hundred years ago (esp. pronunciation), prior to the vowel shifts (and grammatical changes) that have since occurred in English. [Source: Some Oxford publication or other (I can't remember which - probably an etymological dictionary).]

Re: Spoilers For Thursday 3rd December 2009

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:46 pm
by D Eadie
James Robinson wrote: It seems that Jon Gaunt is still dividing opinions among fellow forumites, especially after his talk about food yesterday, but I'm still on the "not so sure" side of things about him. Still, we could always plead to Damian to bring on a journalist who is the direct opposite to Gaunt.

Any suggestions :?:

I doubt it.