Page 1 of 1

Wednesday 25th September 2002 (Ser. 48, Prelim 48)

Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:53 pm
by James Robinson
Countdown recap for Wednesday 25 September 2002.

C1: Champion Roger Ordish (1 win, 88 points.)
C2: Challenger Joyce Dunkley.
DC: Richard Samson and Thelma Barlow.
CV: Carol Vorderman.
OT: Other words or solutions.

R01: R V C M I A E S O
R02: G D R L A I E E T
R03: P N R D A I O U A
R04: T S L I E U E M P
R05: 100, 6, 9, 1, 8, 10. Target: 519.
TTT: HEATCAR - "From the neck down"
R06: C G T B I A O E H
R07: R S D K I E A F N
R08: G L T M U A O E D
R09: S R N W U O E C S
R10: 50, 25, 6, 9, 8, 7. Target: 866.
TTT: REFUTAL - "Eyes well that ends well"
R11: T L P G A U O I E
R12: R V T D E A O A N
R13: S Z Y M F E U O L
R14: 25, 75, 4, 4, 7, 10. Target: 636.
R15: M O A N I D E N T (conundrum)


And now a brief interlude before our main feature:

SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER

Enjoy the show.

Round 1: R V C M I A E S O

C1: VARIES (6)
C2: SCREAM (6)
DC: OVARIES (7) VARICOSE (8)
Score: 6–6 (max 8)

Round 2: G D R L A I E E T

C1: glaired
C2: TRAILED (7)
DC: RETAILED (8)
OT: GAITERED (8) LITREAGE (8)
Score: 6–13 (max 16)

Round 3: P N R D A I O U A

C1: APRON (5)
C2: PIANO (5)
DC: PARANOID (8)
Score: 11–18 (max 24)

Round 4: T S L I E U E M P

C1: EPISTLE (7)
C2: IMPULSE (7)
DC: LUMPIEST (8) TEMPLES (7)
OT: PLUMIEST (8)
Score: 18–25 (max 32)

Round 5: 100, 6, 9, 1, 8, 10. Target: 519.

C1: 519. (100 x (6 - 1)) + 10 + 9 (10)
C2: 519. (100 x (6 - 1)) + 10 + 9 (10)
Score: 28–35 (max 42)

Teatime teaser: HEATCAR -> TRACHEA

Round 6: C G T B I A O E H

C1: BITCH (5)
C2: BIGHT (5)
DC: BIOTECH (7) ICEBOAT (7)
OT: ACHIOTE (7) COHABIT (7)
Score: 33–40 (max 49)

Round 7: R S D K I E A F N

C1: FRIENDS (7)
C2: FRISKED (7)
DC: SARDINE (7) FRANKED (7)
OT: DARKENS (7) DARKIES (7) FINDERS (7) REDSKIN (7) SKINDER (7) KNIFERS (7) SANDIER (7) SNAKIER (7) SNARFED (7)
Score: 40–47 (max 56)

Round 8: G L T M U A O E D

C1: GLOATED (7)
C2: MALTED (6)
DC: MODULATE (8)
Score: 47–47 (max 64)

Round 9: S R N W U O E C S

C1: COWERS (6)
C2: WORSENS (7)
DC: UNSCREWS (8)
OT: CORNUSES (8) SNOWSURE (8)
Score: 47–54 (max 72)

Round 10: 50, 25, 6, 9, 8, 7. Target: 866.

C1: -
C2: -
CV: 864. (7)
OT: 866. ((50 x (25 - 8)) + 9 + 7 (10)
Score: 47–54 (max 82)

Teatime teaser: REFUTAL -> TEARFUL

Round 11: T L P G A U O I E

C1: PILOTAGE (8)
C2: GLUEPOT (7)
DC: GALIPOT (7)
Score: 55–54 (max 90)

Round 12: R V T D E A O A N

C1: RAVEN (5)
C2: TREAD (5)
DC: VERDANT (7) NOVATED (7)
OT: TAVERNA (7) VERANDA (7)
Score: 60–59 (max 97)

Round 13: S Z Y M F E U O L

C1: FLUMES (6)
C2: MULES (5)
DC: MYSELF (6) FULSOME (7)
Score: 66–59 (max 104)

Round 14: 25, 75, 4, 4, 7, 10. Target: 636.

C1: 656.
C2: 645. ((75 - 4 - 4) x 10) - 25 (5)
CV: 636. ((75 - 7 - 4) x 10) - 4 (10)
Score: 66–64 (max 114)

Round 15: M O A N I D E N T

C2 buzzes on 8 seconds to say NOMINATED which is correct.
Score: 66–74 (max 124)

Statistics Corner

Roger:
Total score - 66
Raw score - 72
Total % of max - 53
Raw % of max - 58
Total average score per round - 4.4
Raw average score per round - 4.8
Number of maxes - 3

Joyce:
Total score - 74
Raw score - 92
Total % of max - 60
Raw % of max - 74
Total average score per round - 4.9
Raw average score per round - 6.1
Number of maxes - 3

Further summaries are at:
http://www.apterous.org/cdb/series.php?series=48

Re: Wednesday 25th September 2002 (Ser. 48, Prelim 48)

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:44 pm
by Charlie Reams
Nice. Where did you get this?

Re: Wednesday 25th September 2002 (Ser. 48, Prelim 48)

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:03 pm
by James Robinson
Charlie Reams wrote:Nice. Where did you get this?
It's on YouTube, thanks to Timothy Fail, who has donated quite a few 2002 episodes to Thomas Wood. So, I thought why not upload them :?:

Re: Wednesday 25th September 2002 (Ser. 48, Prelim 48)

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:20 pm
by Clive Brooker
Good work James.

Quite a few of the Youtube uploads (but not all) have been linked from Countdownwiki, which seems very sensible. Should I be volunteering to help with this?

There are a few episodes on Youtube put there by people other that Thomas Wood, notably this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh1itxk4 ... re=related

It would be good to have them all catalogued.

Re: Wednesday 25th September 2002 (Ser. 48, Prelim 48)

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:24 pm
by James Robinson
Clive Brooker wrote:Good work James.

Quite a few of the Youtube uploads (but not all) have been linked from Countdownwiki, which seems very sensible. Should I be volunteering to help with this?

There are a few episodes on Youtube put there by people other that Thomas Wood, notably this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh1itxk4 ... re=related

It would be good to have them all catalogued.
It's a very good idea, Clive.

I definitely think it needs doing as a matter of urgency.

Re: Wednesday 25th September 2002 (Ser. 48, Prelim 48)

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:45 pm
by Clive Brooker
It's not really my idea.

I've just had a look at the Wiki, and there seem to be two separate initiatives, involving Thomas Wood and Martin Gardner:

http://wiki.apterous.org/YouTube_contents

http://wiki.apterous.org/Category:Episodes_on_YouTube

So leaping in to help might cause confusion rather than clarify things.