Page 1 of 1

I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:25 am
by Jason Larsen
Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to apologize for getting my hopes up too high when I originally began to talk about Countdown in its current state.

It turns out that James Robinson was right. Countdown's ratings are dropping.

Its future is now in limbo.

Source: About 1/4 of the way down on the page http://www.gameshownewsnet.com

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:33 am
by Jason Larsen
I just called Lara Searle to express my sympathy.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:13 am
by D Eadie
I can't believe it, but I'll have to
Is this a new brand of margarine?
Jason Larsen wrote:I just called Lara Searle to express my sympathy.

So did i.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:01 am
by Darren Carter
How do the ratings compare to other programmes in that time slot? Quite favourably I would imagine.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:17 am
by Matthew Green
Jason Larsen wrote:I just called Lara Searle to express my sympathy.
I bet that made her feel better.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:17 pm
by Douglas Wilson
Why don't you finally do those recaps you've promised for ages Jason.

It will cheer Lara Searle up hugely.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:57 pm
by Matthew Green
D Eadie wrote:
I can't believe it, but I'll have to
Is this a new brand of margarine?
It's a new type of forumite called James Robinson- 'I can't believe its not Jason Larsen, but I'll have to.'

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:10 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Reminds me of this

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:14 am
by Jason Larsen
No, I am dead serious about all of this!

Now, everybody, please watch this thread.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:48 am
by Jason Larsen
Here is a message from me.

http://www.box.net/shared/jrhg2tpnij

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:41 am
by Oliver Garner
Jason Larsen wrote:Here is a message from me.

http://www.box.net/shared/jrhg2tpnij
THIS RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D :D

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:15 am
by Davy Affleck
The "figures in its heyday" were taken when there really only 4 channels that people watched (and a handfull on early Sky).
Viewing figures on ALL channels are down compared with then due to many reasons including the massive choice of channel & the variety of ways to record or watch "non live" TV. Advertising income is also down to those reasons & also the current financial state of the world.
So there.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:59 pm
by Ralph Gillions
I admire the passion in your message Jason. Thank you.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:59 pm
by Julie T
Oliver Garner wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:Here is a message from me.

http://www.box.net/shared/jrhg2tpnij
THIS RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D :D
Wonderful message, Jason. Thanks for that. :D

(I hate to be picky, as it was a lovely message, but Countdown has been going on Channel 4 for nearly 27 years now, not 23).

I think, though, that the website you mentioned probably got the info from the recent nasty Daily Mail article, which Damian has trashed in another thread.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2870

You shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet or in the papers. ;)

I hope that we have nothing to worry about. Half a million viewers for a low production cost show isn't bad these days. :)

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:23 pm
by Jason Larsen
Thank you, Oliver, for your kind words! I appreciate your commplements too, Julie and Ralph!

Julie, the reason why I said 23 years is because back when Countdown celebrated its 25rh anniversary, Gordon Brown said that he hopes Countdown will be around for 25 + 25 years. 25 + 25 = 50 and in this case since Countdown is in its 27th year, 50 - 27 = 23. Now, I bet you all understand it!

Again, thank you, everyone!

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:33 pm
by JimBentley
Jason Larsen wrote:Julie, the reason why I said 23 years is because back when Countdown celebrated its 25rh anniversary, Gordon Brown said that he hopes Countdown will be around for 25 + 25 years. 25 + 25 = 50 and in this case since Countdown is in its 27th year, 50 - 27 = 23. Now, I bet you all understand it!
Ah, but Gordon Brown doesn't always have a good grasp on figures. What if he thought 25 + 25 was 96, or 107, or some other random number seemingly produced from his arse?

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:51 pm
by Phil Makepeace
The University of London has blocked the link to Jason's novella. Is it particularly graphic, or does THE MAN just hate outpourings of emotion towards a TV show? I bet Jason's published the 'I love Lara Searle' tattoo across his tits though.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 5:27 pm
by Jason Larsen
I just sent Lara and Kate a bear hug e-card with a butterfly stamp wishing them luck in this struggling economy and telling them how wonderful they are!

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 5:28 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Jason Larsen wrote:I just sent Lara and Kate a bear hug e-card
Bears don't hug - they kill.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 5:35 pm
by Alec Rivers
Kirk Bevins wrote:Bears don't hug - they kill.
Sarah Palin's war-cry, no?

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:56 pm
by Derek Hazell
Just as Matthew Green has lost his avatar, Julie has gained an avatar.

I can't believe it, but I'll have to.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:15 pm
by Jason Larsen
And Lara Searle has responded to my e-card and said that it was sweet of me to send her one but not to worry about her. She's a sweet person herself!

I can believe that, and I didn't have to!

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:16 pm
by Derek Hazell
Now that Jason's favourite hospital-based-drama-starring-a-dond-host has replaced Countdown in the mornings, does that mean that the team have all received a wage cut due to repeat fees? Coming at a time when BBC cuts are also high on the agenda, maybe this is another reason for us to get our sympathy cards out.

I believe it, but I don't know if I should do.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:06 pm
by Jason Larsen
Derek, there is no such thing as repeat fees.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:11 pm
by Derek Hazell
Jason Larsen wrote:Derek, there is no such thing as repeat fees.
Oh okay, thanks for letting me know, Jason. Is it only actors who get those then? Will Howie Mandel be getting them through St. Elsewhere being on here, or how does it work?

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:40 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Derek Hazell wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:Derek, there is no such thing as repeat fees.
Oh okay, thanks for letting me know, Jason. Is it only actors who get those then? Will Howie Mandel be getting them through St. Elsewhere being on here, or how does it work?
Depends entirely on the terms of the contract the artist has with the programme maker. For actors, it tends to be on a reducing scale over time, so that early repeats and overseas sales earn a reasonable proportion of the initial fee while showings many years later earn the actors very little or even nothing. St Elsewhere (of blessed memory) is over 20 years old now, so I suspect a repeated episode on C4 in the wee hours only earns Howie Mandel, Denzel Washington and the rest a few dollars if that.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:05 pm
by AndyB2007
Phil Reynolds wrote:
Derek Hazell wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:Derek, there is no such thing as repeat fees.
Oh okay, thanks for letting me know, Jason. Is it only actors who get those then? Will Howie Mandel be getting them through St. Elsewhere being on here, or how does it work?
Depends entirely on the terms of the contract the artist has with the programme maker. For actors, it tends to be on a reducing scale over time, so that early repeats and overseas sales earn a reasonable proportion of the initial fee while showings many years later earn the actors very little or even nothing. St Elsewhere (of blessed memory) is over 20 years old now, so I suspect a repeated episode on C4 in the wee hours only earns Howie Mandel, Denzel Washington and the rest a few dollars if that.
It's worth noting that St Elsewhere was made by MTM Productions, which was later bought by News Corporation's 20th Century Fox arm (previously MTM was owned by TVS before they lost their ITV franchise back in 1991,then it was sold to International Family Entertainment, and IFE in turn was bought by Fox),and of course 20th Century Fox just happens to produce The Simpsons, also shown by C4.

I wonder how much it costs for C4 to show St Elsewhere, or did they get it as part of The Simpsons deal? The BBC must get a good deal with NBC Universal for Murder She Wrote and CBS Television Distribution for Diagnosis Murder, considering the amount of times they show it.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 2:11 am
by Jason Larsen
That's right, they have to get the rights to American TV!

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 7:19 pm
by AndyB2007
Julie T wrote:
Oliver Garner wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:Here is a message from me.

http://www.box.net/shared/jrhg2tpnij
THIS RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D :D
Wonderful message, Jason. Thanks for that. :D

(I hate to be picky, as it was a lovely message, but Countdown has been going on Channel 4 for nearly 27 years now, not 23).

I think, though, that the website you mentioned probably got the info from the recent nasty Daily Mail article, which Damian has trashed in another thread.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2870

You shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet or in the papers. ;)

I hope that we have nothing to worry about. Half a million viewers for a low production cost show isn't bad these days. :)
Have to agree Julie T. The comments towards Jeff and Rachel are a bit venomous.

To those DM readers criticising Jeff and Rachel on Countdown, they cannot be any worse than what has happened to BBC Newcastle's breakfast show since Mike Parr (their answer to Richard Whiteley) left. In his place we have a stand-up comedian with no journalistic experience unlike his female co-anchor. And yet those DM readers moan at Jeff Stelling, someone who at least has worked from the bottom.

I don't mind Jeff and Rachel on Countdown at all, and hope they continue.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:11 am
by Chris Corby
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Bears don't hug - they kill.
I did an internet search for 'Bears' and found a variety of short films. None of them featured killing but most of them did a lot more than just hug I can tell you....

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:32 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Chris Corby wrote: I did an internet search for 'Bears' and found a variety of short films. None of them featured killing but most of them did a lot more than just hug I can tell you....
Doubt you'd find many videos on youtube of people dying from bears to be fair but they do kill and you see videos of people mauled and then the aftermath in hospital.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:35 pm
by Derek Hazell
Kirk Bevins wrote:Doubt you'd find many videos on youtube of people dying from bears to be fair but they do kill and you see videos of people mauled and then the aftermath in hospital.
Apart from Kirk Bear-vins.
(Sorry, it's what Sue Sanders would have wanted.)

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:59 pm
by Brian Moore
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Chris Corby wrote: I did an internet search for 'Bears' and found a variety of short films. None of them featured killing but most of them did a lot more than just hug I can tell you....
Doubt you'd find many videos on youtube of people dying from bears to be fair but they do kill and you see videos of people mauled and then the aftermath in hospital.
I didn't write Watership Down.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:07 pm
by Lesley Hines
Brian Moore wrote:I didn't write Watership Down.
Doh! That's because you were too busy writing The Statement and The Colour of Blood. I'd have to say though, you're in remarkable health :lol:

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:11 pm
by Brian Moore
Lesley Hines wrote:
Brian Moore wrote:I didn't write Watership Down.
Doh! That's because you were too busy writing The Statement and The Colour of Blood. I'd have to say though, you're in remarkable health :lol:
Writing stuff keeps me occupied when I'm not being a retired rugby player or a dead football commentator.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 2:44 pm
by Jason Larsen
This is all over, everybody. Ok?

It's all over?

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:28 pm
by AndyB2007
Bumping this, but I see there's another change from Monday morning- the US teen drama One Tree Hill (starring Chad Michael Murray of Freaky Friday and Dawson's Creek fame,as well as Sophia Bush who was in the Hitcher remake with Sean Bean)will air in Countdown's old slot at 5.10am, with St Elsewhere back to it's 4.20am berth.

It makes you yearn for Jeff and Rachel back in that slot.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:55 pm
by Alec Rivers
AndyB2007 wrote:It makes you yearn for Jeff and Rachel back in that slot.
Crikey! "Jeff", "Rachel" and "slot" in the same sentence and no innuendo. That's a first. Image

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:57 pm
by AndyB2007
Alec Rivers wrote:
AndyB2007 wrote:It makes you yearn for Jeff and Rachel back in that slot.
Crikey! "Jeff", "Rachel" and "slot" in the same sentence and no innuendo. That's a first. Image
Thank you. But really if that's what C4 can muster up at 5.20am, then Countdown might as well return.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:32 pm
by James Robinson
AndyB2007 wrote:
Alec Rivers wrote:
AndyB2007 wrote:It makes you yearn for Jeff and Rachel back in that slot.
Crikey! "Jeff", "Rachel" and "slot" in the same sentence and no innuendo. That's a first. Image
Thank you. But really if that's what C4 can muster up at 5.20am, then Countdown might as well return.
Interesting news that I found out earlier this week, but have kept on forgetting to mention to our-early morning forumites.

Since Thursday, Channel 4 seemed to have bowed down to pressure and re-instated Countdown to its early-morning repeat slot. 5am I believe is the default time, so all you early risers don't have to miss out again.

Although with 4OD & Sky+ and all that you shouldn't really anyway.

Re: I can't believe it, but I'll have to

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:50 am
by Sally Taylor
The early morning repeats are useful when my sky plus fails (which it often does) or if you don't have a PC to watch 4OD (which I didn't at the time).

I missed 4 or 5 episodes towards the end of 2009, so glad they have re-instated the early morning shows. 8-)