Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:08 pm
by Marc Meakin
Can Chris become Octochamp today, or will he be beaten by an inswinger

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:40 pm
by Peter Mabey
First numbers alternative: (75-3-3)x(9-2)

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:43 pm
by Marc Meakin
poor letter selections so far.

What has been the lowest ever Max game?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:55 pm
by Charlie Reams
http://www.apterous.org/cdb/records.php ... st_maximum

No chance of pushing these records unless one of the numbers games is impossible, really.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:12 pm
by Peter Mabey
It's really strange that RATIONALS is missing as IRRATIONALS is allowed by ODE. :?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:13 pm
by Kirk Bevins
INWALES for a beater in round 3. I thought I could get a max game today but missed PIPETTES, argh.

Well played again today Chris. You seemed to slump back in your chair once you made the octochamp status as in relief but you weren't really under much threat this game. A tremendous performance and I'm sure many people at home would wonder why you're only the number 2 seed, forgetting Andrew's superb run.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:16 pm
by Marc Meakin
Kirk Bevins wrote:INWALES for a beater in round 3. I thought I could get a max game today but missed PIPETTES, argh.

Well played again today Chris. You seemed to slump back in your chair once you made the octochamp status as in relief but you weren't really under much threat this game. A tremendous performance and I'm sure many people at home would wonder why you're only the number 2 seed, forgetting Andrew's superb run.
Probably due to the low amounts of 9 letter words available in his run compared to Andrew

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:17 pm
by Jojo Apollo
Well done on becoming an Octochamp, Chris. 8-)

Really looking forward to seeing the quarters with the big three. Hopefully some more top guns to follow. :D

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:28 pm
by Craig Beevers
Charlie Reams wrote:http://www.apterous.org/cdb/records.php ... st_maximum

No chance of pushing these records unless one of the numbers games is impossible, really.
First game on that list has an incorrect max... 2nd numbers game is easily doable.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:44 pm
by Jimmy Gough
Jojo Apollo wrote:Well done on becoming an Octochamp, Chris. 8-)

Really looking forward to seeing the quarters with the big three. Hopefully some more top guns to follow. :D
Isn't this you? :?:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:09 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Craig Beevers wrote:
First game on that list has an incorrect max... 2nd numbers game is easily doable.
In fact Carol got it spot on but it erroneously shows 542 instead of 544.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:50 pm
by Eoin Monaghan
Did Chris use the 2 twice in the first numbers?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:00 pm
by Chris Davies
Jimmy Gough wrote:
Jojo Apollo wrote:Well done on becoming an Octochamp, Chris. 8-)

Really looking forward to seeing the quarters with the big three. Hopefully some more top guns to follow. :D
Isn't this you? :?:
:shock:

Well, I feel I've been judged very harshly there. :( I felt really self-conscious throughout my Countdown run - I know I twitch when I'm nervous, and I was feeling the pressure pretty much the whole time, even when I was miles ahead. I wasn't natural in front of the cameras, and if I've conveyed any air of smugness at all, it was entirely accidental!

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:02 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Eoin Monaghan wrote:Did Chris use the 2 twice in the first numbers?
No.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:05 pm
by Ben Hunter
Chris Davies wrote: :shock:

Well, I feel I've been judged very harshly there. :( I felt really self-conscious throughout my Countdown run - I know I twitch when I'm nervous, and I was feeling the pressure pretty much the whole time, even when I was miles ahead. I wasn't natural in front of the cameras, and if I've conveyed any air of smugness at all, it was entirely accidental!
You don't need to worry about being judged by a load of sad telly addicts.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:07 pm
by JimBentley
Chris Davies wrote: :shock:

Well, I feel I've been judged very harshly there. :( I felt really self-conscious throughout my Countdown run - I know I twitch when I'm nervous, and I was feeling the pressure pretty much the whole time, even when I was miles ahead. I wasn't natural in front of the cameras, and if I've conveyed any air of smugness at all, it was entirely accidental!
Don't worry about it, Chris, the Digital Spy forums are notorious for being full of cunts. They're a bunch of nobodies and their opinions are worthless.

Oh, and really well done on your awesome octoperformance!

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:16 pm
by Eoin Monaghan
Chris didn't appear to be smug to me at all.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:28 pm
by Joyce Phillips
Well done Chris. You certainly didn't come across as smug. In fact, you seemed to be the only person who had any doubt that you would become and Octochamp.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:39 pm
by Brian Moore
News latest: Kate Humble reads reasonably well from a book, quoting a man from Devon, who quotes a man from Marks & Spencers about why you should use fresh water for making tea. Gosh. It's a shame Kate pulled such a blinder, as it quite overshadowed Chris's excellent performance.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:21 pm
by Gavin Chipper
What was the 8-game total in the end? I think it might have been just shy of 900 (like 892 or something but I'm not sure). Also how come Andrew Hulme has 9 games in the octo run on the database thing?

And this is going to be a fucking good knockout section. I don't think anyone scoring as high as Innis in third place has ever not been number one seed before. So well done Chris.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:33 pm
by Michael Wallace
Joyce Phillips wrote:Well done Chris. You certainly didn't come across as smug. In fact, you seemed to be the only person who had any doubt that you would become and Octochamp.
This.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:52 pm
by Darren Carter
Felt sorry for Chris' opponent today, seemed to be even more nervous than Chris! Although I did chuckle slightly at the 3 when MAKE was written out in the selection! :D

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:59 pm
by Simon Myers
Gavin Chipper wrote:What was the 8-game total in the end?
892
Gavin Chipper wrote:I don't think anyone scoring as high as Innis in third place has ever not been number one seed before. So well done Chris.
You're right, Innis' 861 is higher than any past #2 seed, the highest scoring of which were Jon Corby (856, S54) and Tom Hargreaves (850, S47).

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:09 pm
by Kieran Child
I just watched again and I was right:
Chris declares rationals.
Susie says no.
The woman with the smile next to her says "yes. susie said to me 'I've got a 9 I've got a 9' but then she did what you [chris] did and looked it up"

So Chris was allowed a dictionary. That explains it.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:18 pm
by Jimmy Gough
Chris Davies wrote:
Jimmy Gough wrote:
Jojo Apollo wrote:Well done on becoming an Octochamp, Chris. 8-)

Really looking forward to seeing the quarters with the big three. Hopefully some more top guns to follow. :D
Isn't this you? :?:
:shock:

Well, I feel I've been judged very harshly there. :( I felt really self-conscious throughout my Countdown run - I know I twitch when I'm nervous, and I was feeling the pressure pretty much the whole time, even when I was miles ahead. I wasn't natural in front of the cameras, and if I've conveyed any air of smugness at all, it was entirely accidental!
Sorry Chris, it wasn't meant as a downer on your octochamp success. Like everyone else I didn't detect any smugness at all. You did seem (understandably) nervous throughout but not smug in the slightest. Congratulations and good luck in the final.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:55 pm
by Jojo Apollo
Jimmy Gough wrote:
Jojo Apollo wrote:Well done on becoming an Octochamp, Chris. 8-)

Really looking forward to seeing the quarters with the big three. Hopefully some more top guns to follow. :D
Isn't this you? :?:
No way!!! I have the upmost (or is it utmost?) respect for Chris and Kirk and all the contestants who are brave enough to take part. Chris, don't take any notice of that idiot, you didn't come across as smug at all, and even if you did (which you didn't), so what? Also don't worry about the nerves showing, it's natural. Keep up the good work and good luck in the quarters.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:36 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Jimmy Gough wrote:Congratulations and good luck in the final.
Bit optimistic? Looks like a Chris Davies vs Innis Carson semi final on the cards.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:40 pm
by Charlie Reams
If I were any more excited about this series' finals I'd have to be legally restrained.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 12:27 am
by Jimmy Gough
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Jimmy Gough wrote:Congratulations and good luck in the final.
Bit optimistic? Looks like a Chris Davies vs Innis Carson semi final on the cards.
Ha, true. Finals then.
Jojo Apollo wrote:
Jimmy Gough wrote:
Jojo Apollo wrote:Well done on becoming an Octochamp, Chris. 8-)

Really looking forward to seeing the quarters with the big three. Hopefully some more top guns to follow. :D
Isn't this you? :?:
No way!!! I have the upmost (or is it utmost?) respect for Chris and Kirk and all the contestants who are brave enough to take part. Chris, don't take any notice of that idiot, you didn't come across as smug at all, and even if you did (which you didn't), so what? Also don't worry about the nerves showing, it's natural. Keep up the good work and good luck in the quarters.
:)

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:37 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Is "finals" just something that's come from the football World Cup?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:49 pm
by Howard Somerset
Back to the word RATIONALS not being allowed. As a result of a separate thread, I've just looked up the definition of POSITIVE, and notice that when talking about a positive number, positive is listed both as an adjective and a noun. Strange that POSITIVE should get this treatment, yet RATIONAL is shown as an adjective only. I'd have thought that it should have been the other way round; calling a rational number a rational is quite common in my experience, far more common that calling a positive number a positive.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:47 pm
by Ben Hunter
I always heard my old maths teacher call rational numbers 'rationals'.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:54 am
by Sue Sanders
Howard Somerset wrote:Back to the word RATIONALS not being allowed. As a result of a separate thread, I've just looked up the definition of POSITIVE, and notice that when talking about a positive number, positive is listed both as an adjective and a noun. Strange that POSITIVE should get this treatment, yet RATIONAL is shown as an adjective only. I'd have thought that it should have been the other way round; calling a rational number a rational is quite common in my experience, far more common that calling a positive number a positive.
But talking about the positives and negatives of a situation rather than thinking of positive as being a maths thing is perfectly common.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:40 am
by Michael Wallace
Sue Sanders wrote:But talking about the positives and negatives of a situation rather than thinking of positive as being a maths thing is perfectly common.
Howard Somerset wrote:I've just looked up the definition of POSITIVE, and notice that when talking about a positive number, positive is listed both as an adjective and a noun.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:32 pm
by Sue Sanders
Michael Wallace wrote:
Sue Sanders wrote:But talking about the positives and negatives of a situation rather than thinking of positive as being a maths thing is perfectly common.
Howard Somerset wrote:I've just looked up the definition of POSITIVE, and notice that when talking about a positive number, positive is listed both as an adjective and a noun.
Oh, did I miss the point??? Sorry!!

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:12 pm
by Martin Bishop
As is often the case, I am about a week behind with my countdown viewing. Congrats Chris on a great octo-run. You may be pleased to know that you are now my mum's favourite apterist. Sorry Kirk; you've been usurped.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:24 pm
by Matt Morrison
Old news I know, but Chris didn't come across as smug, just nervous. To me, nervousness and smugness tend to be pretty much polar opposites - it's pretty hard to come across as both, and I'd have thought (until all the "Chris = smug" comments on Digital Spy) that it'd be pretty hard to confuse them as a viewer too.

And on the Mother's Favourite Countdowner level, it's still Jimmy. By far.