Page 1 of 1

Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:50 am
by Chris Philpot
It's not particularly family friendly, is it?! I had a bit of a double-take when I unveiled today's page to be greeted by a sex act... :o

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:04 am
by Kai Laddiman
Your avatar isn't particularly family friendly, is it?! I had a bit of a double-take when I unveiled this topic to be greeted by a sex act... :o

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:12 am
by Chris Philpot
Well this is c4c, home of all such rudeness and general frivolity. The calendar is nationally sold to people of all ages. I should add that it doesn't offend me (obviously, granted the crudeness on display in my avatar as Kai rightly says) - indeed, I found it quite funny! Just somewhat out of character for the calendar, perhaps?

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:21 am
by Jon Corby
Um, some of us don't have the calendar, so some more information might be useful here.


Like, what day is it? I haven't got a freaking clue.

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:37 am
by Kai Laddiman
It's Chris' birthday, Corby!

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:46 am
by Chris Philpot
Aaah, well that probably explains it! I was deliberately not stating the conundrum from the calendar to encourage those who have it to flip to today, but for the benefit of those who don't the 3rd of September asks you to unscramble EFELLATED.

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:42 am
by Kieran Child
"If anyone is still flipping when it gets to september, then they'll probably just be one of those dodgy apterous users."

Wait until you see what glavanize is scrambled as next.

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:03 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Kieran Child wrote:
Wait until you see what glavanize is scrambled as next.
Brilliant.

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:50 pm
by Sue Sanders
Plenty of time in the future to be EFELLATED, Chris ;)

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:57 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Sue Sanders wrote:Plenty of time in the future to be EFELLATED, Chris ;)
Why does he want leaflets?

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:06 pm
by Sue Sanders
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Sue Sanders wrote:Plenty of time in the future to be EFELLATED, Chris ;)
Why does he want leaflets?
:roll:

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:07 pm
by Michael Wallace
Phwoar, I'll give *you* some of *my* *leaflets* any day.

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:13 pm
by Sue Sanders
My leafleting skills are reknowned :o ;) (Though I'm taking it that was a general message rather than a personal one :lol: )

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:43 pm
by Chris Philpot
Kai Laddiman wrote:It's Chris' birthday, Corby!
For the record I misread this earlier - it's not my birthday! Maybe it is Julian Fell's?

I believe my birthday has a more instantly recognisable scramble that is linked to my online persona.

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:02 am
by Ian Volante
Sue Sanders wrote:Plenty of time in the future to be EFELLATED, Chris ;)
Today's the day to sit with one's legs astride the PC tower methinks. Or yesterday.

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:10 am
by Jason Larsen
That's how TV is nowadays, Chris.

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:56 am
by Kirk Bevins
Jason Larsen wrote:That's how TV is nowadays, Chris.
You suck your TV off? Huh?

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 3:10 am
by Ralph Gillions
Kirk Bevins wrote:You suck your TV off? Huh?
It depends who is on at the time.

Re: Today's Countdown calendar conundrum

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 3:19 am
by Jason Larsen
No, Kirk.