Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:39 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Alternative first numbers:

(50-8) x 6x3 + 7

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:06 pm
by Jimmy Gough
NORTENA (David O'Donnell) in round 13. And I got CATHEAD 8-)

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:11 pm
by Jimmy Gough
Congrats on octochampdom James! :D That woman was quite unlucky - would've been interesting if she hadn't risked implorer.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:13 pm
by JackHurst
Alternate conundrum!

OUTSOURCE

what do you think would have happened if someone buzzed in with that as their answer?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:14 pm
by Karen Pearson
RESONANT in round 13 (TONNERS + A).

And an earlier contestant equaller/DC beater: ESPIED

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:19 pm
by Jimmy Gough
JackHurst wrote:Alternate conundrum!

OUTSOURCE

what do you think would have happened if someone buzzed in with that as their answer?
Wow, nice spot! I didn't see that. Yeah, would be interesting to see what would happen. I suppose it would be allowed since it is the correct answer.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:22 pm
by Charlie Reams
Jimmy Gough wrote:
JackHurst wrote:Alternate conundrum!

OUTSOURCE

what do you think would have happened if someone buzzed in with that as their answer?
Wow, nice spot! I didn't see that. Yeah, would be interesting to see what would happen. I suppose it would be allowed since it is the correct answer.
Yes, they've said before that they would allow the alternative answer, although they might have to reshoot.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:58 pm
by Jojo Apollo
Congrats on being an Octochamp James, you had a tough opponent there, thought she was going to win at one stage.

So that's now six octochamps in the quarters - great stuff.

Think Jeff implied they are starting next week.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:21 pm
by Allan Harmer
Phil Reynolds wrote:Alternative first numbers:

(50-8) x 6x3 + 7
Phil - I got it by doing (50-2)x6x3 +7 - Is that what you meant?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:49 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Allan Harmer wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:Alternative first numbers:

(50-8) x 6x3 + 7
Phil - I got it by doing (50-2)x6x3 +7 - Is that what you meant?
Oops, yeah, thanks Allan. I had 48*18 + 7 in my head but, in my rush to type it in before forgetting it, 48 came out as 50-8, which is especially dumb since there wasn't an 8 in the selection.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:24 pm
by Tracey Lilly
espied for another six in round 8
novates for another seven in round 13

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:18 pm
by Darren Carter
JackHurst wrote:Alternate conundrum!

OUTSOURCE

what do you think would have happened if someone buzzed in with that as their answer?
I had OUTSOURCE as well and was shocked when it wasn't the right one! Checked the OED2r and found it was definitely in.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:49 am
by James Hurrell
Jimmy Gough wrote:NORTENA (David O'Donnell) in round 13. And I got CATHEAD 8-)
NORTENAS not in?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:18 pm
by Kirk Bevins
James Hurrell wrote:
NORTENAS not in?
No. Well done James on becoming an octochamp. The quarter finals start next Thursday so there is not enough time left for another octochamp so this series will have to stick with 6 octochamps - not bad.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:20 pm
by Darren Carter
Kirk Bevins wrote:The quarter finals start next Thursday so there is not enough time left for another octochamp so this series will have to stick with 6 octochamps - not bad.
You, Jimmy, Cate, Shane, James - who's the other one?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:24 pm
by Ian Fitzpatrick
Darren Carter wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:The quarter finals start next Thursday so there is not enough time left for another octochamp so this series will have to stick with 6 octochamps - not bad.
You, Jimmy, Cate, Shane, James - who's the other one?
Don't forget our Neil Zussman

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:25 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Ian Fitzpatrick wrote:
Don't forget our Neil Zussman
http://www.countdownwiki.com/Series_60

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:50 pm
by Darren Carter
Ian Fitzpatrick wrote:
Darren Carter wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:The quarter finals start next Thursday so there is not enough time left for another octochamp so this series will have to stick with 6 octochamps - not bad.
You, Jimmy, Cate, Shane, James - who's the other one?
Don't forget our Neil Zussman
That's the one! Sorry Neil..... :oops:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 4:30 pm
by Andy Wilson
Ireland is a ridiculously proud nation. For instance, i've heard people bask in the fact that we drink more tea per head than the Chinese. It is with this in mind that i congratulate James on making the finals and becoming an octochamp. G'wan Oireland.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:03 pm
by David Roe
I agree, it is ridiculous for Ireland to be proud of anything. :twisted:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:53 pm
by Jimmy Gough
Andy Wilson wrote:G'wan Oireland.
His name's James. Unless that's some sort of Irish translation.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:02 pm
by Neil Zussman
Darren Carter wrote:
Ian Fitzpatrick wrote:
Darren Carter wrote: You, Jimmy, Cate, Shane, James - who's the other one?
Don't forget our Neil Zussman
That's the one! Sorry Neil..... :oops:
I've only just caught up with this episode- you nearly escaped Darren! But unfortunately for you I've now seen this thread, so consider yourself being given an evil glare. I'm sure you'll live...
I was pretty surprised Outsource was in. I got it, but then saw that the given conundrum was different and assumed it was not valid. But apparently it is. Duel answers. Go figure.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 2nd

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:44 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Neil Zussman wrote:I was pretty surprised Outsource was in. I got it, but then saw that the given conundrum was different and assumed it was not valid. But apparently it is.
Oops, note to self: check spoilers thread for interesting trivia like this before doing the recap (now edited).