Love Lives

Discuss anything interesting but not remotely Countdown-related here.

Moderator: Jon O'Neill

Post Reply

What is your take on the relative vaules of relationships & Countdown?

Poll ended at Thu May 14, 2009 9:23 am

I am always in a relationship, and couldn't imagine being without one
4
19%
I have several relationships on the go, and it sure is making my game suffer!
1
5%
I am in a relationship, but I wish my sexuality was different, it looks so much more exciting over the other side
1
5%
No mere human love could compete for my love of Countdown
2
10%
I am single and pretty desperate, but Countdown keeps me sane
6
29%
I am single and intend to stay that way, Countdown or otherwise
6
29%
I prefer furry animals to any human
1
5%
 
Total votes: 21

User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Love Lives

Post by Derek Hazell »

Are an addiction to Countdown and a love life mutualy exclusive? Some people prefer the freedom of being single, particularly after living with someone in a frustrating environment. Others don't feel "complete" unless they have someone to share everything with. A few people have mentioned on the programme itself that they are single and looking. Others have spoken of their happy relationships whether male or female. So how much importance do you place on relationships, and it there a correlation between Countdown greatness and time for romance?


Edited to close poll.
Last edited by Derek Hazell on Thu May 28, 2009 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Love Lives

Post by Jon Corby »

I'm in a relationship, addicted to Countdown, but prefer furry animals to humans and also like to have sex with them. Which way should I vote?
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Love Lives

Post by Derek Hazell »

Jon Corby wrote:I'm in a relationship, addicted to Countdown, but prefer furry animals to humans and also like to have sex with them. Which way should I vote?
Haha if you can't beat Phil Reynolds, join him eh? ;)


(With the pulling apart poll options, not the preferences you specified)
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
David O'Donnell
Series 58 Champion
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Love Lives

Post by David O'Donnell »

Derek Hazell wrote:Haha if you can't beat Phil Reynolds, join him
I've heard that he does occasionally beat Phil Reynolds.
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Love Lives

Post by Derek Hazell »

David O'Donnell wrote:I've heard that he does occasionally beat Phil Reynolds.
LOL, that was so fing hilarious I just nearly spat pork pie eveywhere!

(the food, not the Desmond's character)
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Adam Dexter
Enthusiast
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Kidderminster

Re: Love Lives

Post by Adam Dexter »

Any takers? Kezra, I'm looking at you....
ADAM DEXTER: MAXED DATER
We're off to button moon :)
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Love Lives

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Derek Hazell wrote:
Jon Corby wrote:I'm in a relationship, addicted to Countdown, but prefer furry animals to humans and also like to have sex with them. Which way should I vote?
Haha if you can't beat Phil Reynolds, join him eh? ;)

(With the pulling apart poll options, not the preferences you specified)
I'm not even going to attempt to pull the options apart as I'll probably get hate mail from Corby again, but the simple truth is that I can't vote because none of the options comes anywhere near describing my domestic situation. The first is probably the closest in intent - I would have gone for that had it simply said "I'm in a long-term relationship".
User avatar
Ben Hunter
Kiloposter
Posts: 1770
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
Location: S Yorks

Re: Love Lives

Post by Ben Hunter »

Whenever I'm with girls I like I can only think about word stems, it's hell.
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4546
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Love Lives

Post by Jon O'Neill »

You know that the options in the poll aren't mutually exclusive, and there's no option for my perspective? Yet another example of bad poll design.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Love Lives

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Jon O'Neill wrote:Yet another example of bad poll design.
The only good poll is a deed poll.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Love Lives

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Ben Hunter wrote:Whenever I'm with girls I like I can only think about word stems, it's hell.
Haha I hope you're being serious. I have this trouble sometimes when my mind wanders with a girl. That's probably why I'm still single.
User avatar
Adam Dexter
Enthusiast
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Kidderminster

Re: Love Lives

Post by Adam Dexter »

Kirk Bevins wrote:
Ben Hunter wrote:Whenever I'm with girls I like I can only think about word stems, it's hell.
Haha I hope you're being serious. I have this trouble sometimes when my mind wanders with a girl. That's probably why I'm still single.
I lie alone in bed at night thinking of dream selections and word stems.
ADAM DEXTER: MAXED DATER
We're off to button moon :)
User avatar
Ben Hunter
Kiloposter
Posts: 1770
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
Location: S Yorks

Re: Love Lives

Post by Ben Hunter »

Kirk Bevins wrote:
Ben Hunter wrote:Whenever I'm with girls I like I can only think about word stems, it's hell.
Haha I hope you're being serious. I have this trouble sometimes when my mind wanders with a girl. That's probably why I'm still single.
It's true. Happens to me on nights out too and I can't enjoy myself properly (well, I am enjoying myself, just not for the same reasons anyone else is).
Dinos Sfyris
Series 80 Champion
Posts: 2707
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
Location: Sheffield

Re: Love Lives

Post by Dinos Sfyris »

Phil Reynolds wrote:The only good Pole is a dead Pole.
:o Racist!
Phil Reynolds wrote:The first is probably the closest in intent - I would have gone for that had it simply said "I'm in a long-term relationship".
Likewise, but I voted for it anyway
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Love Lives

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Dinos Sfyris wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:The first is probably the closest in intent - I would have gone for that had it simply said "I'm in a long-term relationship".
Likewise - that's why I voted for the third option
Two can play at the misquoting game.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Love Lives

Post by Michael Wallace »

Dinos Sfyris wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:The only good Pole is a dead Pole.
:o Racist!
I thought that was precisely what he was going for in the first place...
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Love Lives

Post by Derek Hazell »

Michael Wallace wrote:I thought that was precisely what he was going for in the first place...
Your interpretations were polls apart...

But, back on topic I misquoted all of your "moms" last night anyway, so why worry?
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Love Lives

Post by Derek Hazell »

This poll is now closed. Interestingly all options got at least one vote.

The singletons far outweigh everyone else though, with their combined votes being well over half of the entire total. Is this a surprise?

The people who love to be in relationships came to just under 1/5 of the total.

We then also had 1 for each of the three "fringe" categories - polygamists, heterophiles/homophiles, and zoophiles. So, as we can see, we are mixing with an interesting assortment of people, who both love their own company but also love some of the less common things in life.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Love Lives

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Derek Hazell wrote:The people who love to be in relationships came to just under 1/5 of the total.
You might arguably have got a more accurate picture if you'd included an option for the most conventional domestic situation apart from being single, i.e. "I am in a relationship and happy that way." This would have given me, and I'd guess many others, an option we could vote for.
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Love Lives

Post by Derek Hazell »

Phil Reynolds wrote:
Derek Hazell wrote:The people who love to be in relationships came to just under 1/5 of the total.
You might arguably have got a more accurate picture if you'd included an option for the most conventional domestic situation apart from being single, i.e. "I am in a relationship and happy that way." This would have given me, and I'd guess many others, an option we could vote for.
Yes, it was an oversight not to include that, as I didn't really leave any option for someone who is in relationships most of the time, but also not worried when they are between them.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Love Lives

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Derek Hazell wrote:I didn't really leave any option for someone who is in relationships most of the time, but also not worried when they are between them.
I was thinking more of someone who is in a single, long-term relationship. The wording "I am always in a relationship" suggests someone who likes being in relationships so much that they are constantly flitting between them.
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Love Lives

Post by Derek Hazell »

Phil Reynolds wrote:The wording "I am always in a relationship" suggests someone who likes being in relationships so much that they are constantly flitting between them.
Oh yeah, maybe. I didn't think about it sounding more like that than someone staying in the same relationship.

Still, I doubt even that would have swung the votes enough to beat the dominance of singletonnery around here :)
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
Post Reply