Page 1 of 1

One or two large?

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:29 pm
by Oliver Garner
It doesn't seem to show it now but when I last looked at the relevant statland page, it showed that 2 large is most likely to be possible, and for a while I always chose 2 large. However, I did a numbers attack recently against Prune, choosing almost entirely 1 large and got 190, making a error in calculation on the other one. Therefore, I started going one large again and have found these games easier. Does anyone have any thoughts?

Re: One or two large?

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:31 pm
by Michael Wallace
Oliver Garner wrote:It doesn't seem to show it now but when I last looked at the relevant statland page, it showed that 2 large is most likely to be possible, and for a while I always chose 2 large. However, I did a numbers attack recently against Prune, choosing almost entirely 1 large and got 190, making a error in calculation on the other one. Therefore, I started going one large again and have found these games easier. Does anyone have any thoughts?
I think the generally accepted opinion is that whilst 2 large gives you a higher chance of it being solvable, 1 large tends to be 'easier'.

Re: One or two large?

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:33 pm
by Oliver Garner
Michael Wallace wrote:
Oliver Garner wrote:It doesn't seem to show it now but when I last looked at the relevant statland page, it showed that 2 large is most likely to be possible, and for a while I always chose 2 large. However, I did a numbers attack recently against Prune, choosing almost entirely 1 large and got 190, making a error in calculation on the other one. Therefore, I started going one large again and have found these games easier. Does anyone have any thoughts?
I think the generally accepted opinion is that whilst 2 large gives you a higher chance of it being solvable, 1 large tends to be 'easier'.
Yeah, I have also noticed that in hyper numbers, 5 large has the highest chance of being solvable even the solutions for 2 large look more doable

Re: One or two large?

Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 10:21 am
by Kirk Bevins
Michael Wallace wrote:
I think the generally accepted opinion is that whilst 2 large gives you a higher chance of it being solvable, 1 large tends to be 'easier'.
Exactly this. 1 large is easier as it is more intuitive to solve and less (sensible) routes to check but as a computer can solve any, a computer should pick 2 large and a human should pick 1 large. In theory.