Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:26 pm
You know the drill.
A word Welsby should know
.c4countdown
A group for contestants and lovers of the Channel 4 game show 'Countdown'.
http://c4countdown.co.uk/
Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Page 1 of 1
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:50 pm
FREEDMAN
A word Welsby should know.
A word Welsby should know
.Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:54 pm
Could you have "incradle"?
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:58 pm
Doesn't look like it, Bryan. Am I the only one who was trailing 0-18 to Des O'Connor after round one? 
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:01 pm
Nope, I didn't see that 9 either, but very well done to Des for spotting it.David O'Donnell wrote:Doesn't look like it, Bryan. Am I the only one who was trailing 0-18 to Des O'Connor after round one?
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:05 pm
PODIUMS?
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:17 pm
No, I failed to see it as well. I was stuck on "sputters"David O'Donnell wrote:Doesn't look like it, Bryan. Am I the only one who was trailing 0-18 to Des O'Connor after round one?
I saw the letters for "upstreet", and wasn't able to make the connection to the word Des got.
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:39 pm
Yeah, I didn't see it. I doubt I'd have risked it anyway even if I'd seen it.David O'Donnell wrote:Doesn't look like it, Bryan. Am I the only one who was trailing 0-18 to Des O'Connor after round one?
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:49 pm
I can't find my dictionary - is CORPUS ok (round 6?)
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:55 pm
Both CORPUS and PODIUMS seem to be fine, I had PODIUMS and probably would have risked it.
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:10 pm
yeah, I was wondering about PODIUMS - surprised Susie didn't check (you'd've expected Des O' to ask, too)
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:16 pm
It seems that im the only one who actually spotted that 9Joseph Bolas wrote:Nope, I didn't see that 9 either, but very well done to Des for spotting it.David O'Donnell wrote:Doesn't look like it, Bryan. Am I the only one who was trailing 0-18 to Des O'Connor after round one?
But i am not sure whether I would have risked it!Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:19 pm
FILANDER (8) in round 9 and UNWAGED (7) in round 11
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:15 pm
It's actually PHILANDER.jasoncullen wrote:FILANDER (8)
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:23 am
I doubt very much that Des actually got it, if that makes you feel any better....David O'Donnell wrote:Doesn't look like it, Bryan. Am I the only one who was trailing 0-18 to Des O'Connor after round one?
You can imagine the disdain in his voice if a contestant offered it - "UPSETTERS? Is that in? I've never heard that word used". Susie never even bothered to check it either.
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:05 pm
not in my dictionary ben pugh! its got an alternative meaning. please check it 
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 28th February
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:16 pm
Maybe so. But is your dictionary the ODE2r? Cause thats the only one that counts. This flurry of illegal words is infuriatingjasoncullen wrote:not in my dictionary ben pugh! its got an alternative meaning. please check it
