Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:29 pm
by tomrowell
Witness the fitness :D

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:34 pm
by Charlie Reams
Is it today or tomorrow with the really fit contestant?

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:35 pm
by Mike Brailsford
DOMINEER also for 8 ?

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:46 pm
by Paul Howe
Charlie Reams wrote:Is it today or tomorrow with the really fit contestant?
Yesterday. I miss you Kirky :cry:

Today's "champion" is rather lovely though.

And I'm not too sure who the DC guest is, but I think he's done really well this week.

That is all.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:47 pm
by tomrowell
Charlie Reams wrote:Is it today or tomorrow with the really fit contestant?
it depends on personal preference, but it would appear to me to be today.

i had DOMINEER as well. after a nervous start this guy is looking good

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:49 pm
by tomrowell
PENISES?

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:50 pm
by Jimmy Gough
tomrowell wrote:PENISES?
I had that too.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:52 pm
by tomrowell
we both have penises. what a relief

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:53 pm
by Charlie Reams
tomrowell wrote:PENISES?
Rachel actually got that herself and there was a great shot of her standing next to it on the board, but they cut it out :(

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:00 pm
by tomrowell
Charlie Reams wrote:
tomrowell wrote:PENISES?
Rachel actually got that herself and there was a great shot of her standing next to it on the board, but they cut it out :(
sure thats not just a fantasy of yours...

SANTEROS?

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:06 pm
by Mike Brailsford
7 x 3 = 21

21 - 6 = 15

50 + 15 = 65

65 x 5 = 325

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:10 pm
by Mark Kudlowski
BEANIES for round 8 ?

3rd numbers: (50 x 6) + (7 x 5) - (7 + 3)

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:32 pm
by Darren Carter
Mark Kudlowski wrote:BEANIES for round 8 ?

3rd numbers: (50 x 6) + (7 x 5) - (7 + 3)
I went for (50 + 3) x 6 = 318 + 7 = 325

Lots of different ways of doing it.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:43 pm
by Jimmy Gough
Wow, you guys really rock at the numbers ;)

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:09 pm
by Eoin Monaghan
Marque for round 13.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:28 pm
by Neil Zussman
Eoin Monaghan wrote:Marque for round 13.
Or Barque, I think.
Also is Sapiens allowed, in the penis round?
And no disrespect meant, but if Kirk had been on today, I think Hazel Wheeler's record may have come under threat. (But maybe I'm being unfair, and it just seems that the contestant is worse than she actually is because I'm comparing her to Kirk).

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:45 pm
by Darren Carter
Neil Zussman wrote:
Eoin Monaghan wrote:Marque for round 13.
And no disrespect meant, but if Kirk had been on today, I think Hazel Wheeler's record may have come under threat. (But maybe I'm being unfair, and it just seems that the contestant is worse than she actually is because I'm comparing her to Kirk).
Who cares - she's better looking than Kirk..... ;)

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:17 pm
by Simon Myers
Neil Zussman wrote:
Eoin Monaghan wrote:Marque for round 13.
Or Barque, I think.
Also is Sapiens allowed, in the penis round?
And no disrespect meant, but if Kirk had been on today, I think Hazel Wheeler's record may have come under threat. (But maybe I'm being unfair, and it just seems that the contestant is worse than she actually is because I'm comparing her to Kirk).
No you're right, Kirk destroyed her from the audience. He was going on about how he could've had a record against her had she appeared during his run. I don't remember his score was though, I'll point him in this direction later.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:32 pm
by Tracey Lilly
I went for (50 + 3) x 6 = 318 + 7 = 325

Lots of different ways of doing it.[/quote]

Me too, and I matched mentored, roughed and basins but nothing inspirational except barque.

All seemed a bit of an anti climax today but 93 was a very respectful winning score.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:58 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Simon Myers wrote: No you're right, Kirk destroyed her from the audience. He was going on about how he could've had a record against her had she appeared during his run. I don't remember his score was though, I'll point him in this direction later.

Yeah, I would have beaten her 115-6. That's the lowest ever opponent's score and joint highest points difference (109) with Julian Fell. I was so annoyed I missed that by just one game.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:00 pm
by Martin Gardner
Neil Zussman wrote:
Eoin Monaghan wrote:Marque for round 13.
Or Barque, I think.
Also is Sapiens allowed, in the penis round?
And no disrespect meant, but if Kirk had been on today, I think Hazel Wheeler's record may have come under threat. (But maybe I'm being unfair, and it just seems that the contestant is worse than she actually is because I'm comparing her to Kirk).
There must be some sort of homo-sapiens joke here.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:09 pm
by Jimmy Gough
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Simon Myers wrote: No you're right, Kirk destroyed her from the audience. He was going on about how he could've had a record against her had she appeared during his run. I don't remember his score was though, I'll point him in this direction later.

Yeah, I would have beaten her 115-6. That's the lowest ever opponent's score and joint highest points difference (109) with Julian Fell. I was so annoyed I missed that by just one game.
Would you really like to've done that though? It must feel so bad and awkward. I mean, sure, they deserve to be beaten convincingly if they're shit but to totally beat the shit out of somebody on TV must almost be as bad as losing. Especially if it was some old woman or a little kid.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:10 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Jimmy Gough wrote: Would you really have like to do that though? It must feel so bad and awkward. I mean, sure, they deserve to be beaten convincingly if they're shit but to totally beat the shit out of somebody on TV must almost be as bad as losing. Especially if it was some old woman or a little kid.
Yeah, when you're on I suggest go for 5s and 6s mate to try to soften any blow you might cause. :)

To be honest I never cared too much about the points difference - I just wanted a massive score and didn't want to be beaten on any round. It didn't feel awkward to beat people by 70 or 80 points regularly, which is probably why so many of my opponents seemed miserable!

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:12 pm
by Kathleen Batlle
Mark Kudlowski wrote:BEANIES for round 8 ?

3rd numbers: (50 x 6) + (7 x 5) - (7 + 3)
I got the numbers like this too. Stephen did well, but I missed Kirk today. I didn't realise just how enthusiastic he was and how thrilled he was when he beat the record. I thought Kezra was very beautiful and accepted defeat graciously. Shame we won't see her again.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:37 pm
by Adam Dexter
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Simon Myers wrote: No you're right, Kirk destroyed her from the audience. He was going on about how he could've had a record against her had she appeared during his run. I don't remember his score was though, I'll point him in this direction later.

Yeah, I would have beaten her 115-6. That's the lowest ever opponent's score and joint highest points difference (109) with Julian Fell. I was so annoyed I missed that by just one game.
However, the fittie might have put you off somewhat!

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:42 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Adam Dexter wrote:
However, the fittie might have put you off somewhat!
Well I saw her more when playing watching the screen from the audience. When you're playing in the studio you don't look at your opponent too often - well I didn't anyway!

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:16 pm
by Rosemary Roberts
Jimmy Gough wrote:to totally beat the shit out of somebody on TV must almost be as bad as losing. Especially if it was some old woman or a little kid.
Just be sure you guys remember that if I ever get on!

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:29 am
by Phil Reynolds
Charlie Reams wrote:Is it today or tomorrow with the really fit contestant?
Don't think it can be today - one of them's got really crooked teeth and the other one's a woman.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:56 pm
by Matthew Green
Phil Reynolds wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote:Is it today or tomorrow with the really fit contestant?
Don't think it can be today - one of them's got really crooked teeth and the other one's a woman.
Hahahaha! :mrgreen:

Does anyone else think she looked like an Asian version of the policewoman out of Shameless?

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:11 pm
by Howard Somerset
Matthew Green wrote:Does anyone else think she looked like an Asian version of the policewoman out of Shameless?
Thanks, Matthew. Now I know who I was trying to think she looked like.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:04 pm
by Jon Corby
Only just catching up on shows...


Kezra Image Image Image