Page 1 of 1

Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:25 pm
by Adam Dexter
Woo I started the thread :D

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:31 pm
by Martin Gardner
Are we only allowed one spoiler in total then?

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:35 pm
by Adam Dexter
I was referring to the whole thing being a spoiler so there :P

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:39 pm
by Martin Gardner
Adam Dexter wrote:I was referring to the whole thing being a spoiler so there :P
Fair enough. Notice how good the second player is at spelling.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:40 pm
by Adam Dexter
Not to mention fairly simple mathematics :P

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:40 pm
by Matt Morrison
R5: alternate numbers for 386

50 x 9 = 450, -75 = 375
+ 10, + 1 = 386

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:41 pm
by Adam Dexter
Matt Morrison wrote:R5: alternate numbers for 386

50 x 9 = 450, -75 = 375
+ 10, + 1 = 386
Nice :) I did Rachel's way. Don't see why she deserved an applause tbh :P

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:43 pm
by Matt Morrison
Yeah, pretty easy really.
Just spotted another: (50/10) x 75 = 5 x 75 = 375, + 10 + 1 = 386
(apologies if this was the method Rachel used, wasn't paying attention!)

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
by Matt Morrison
I actually love Jeff. I got BEMOANS too.
I'm still wondering if sometimes Susie pretends she hasn't found something to give him credit though.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:48 pm
by Martin Gardner
Matt Morrison wrote:Yeah, pretty easy really.
Just spotted another: (50/10) x 75 = 5 x 75 = 375, + 10 + 1 = 386
(apologies if this was the method Rachel used, wasn't paying attention!)
Yes it was... lol. Lots of people don't think of dividing in order to go up to a larger target, so well done to her.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:51 pm
by Adam Dexter
R8: PAROTIDS!

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:53 pm
by Ben Hunter
Adam Dexter wrote:R8: PAROTIDS!
Got that too (and 'traipsed'), though if I was on the show I'd declare 'parodist' even though I got parotids first.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:55 pm
by Adam Dexter
R10: 364

(8 + 3) - 10 = 1
1 + 25 = 26
26 * (10 + 4) = 364

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:56 pm
by Martin Gardner
(25+8+3)*10+4

I think that's more elegant.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:56 pm
by Adam Dexter
Oh... that's how Rachel did it... I posted mine before it was broadcast though so yay :D

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:57 pm
by Matt Morrison
I still can't believe DANGERED isn't a word. Grr. Would have lost myself 8 points that round.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:57 pm
by Adam Dexter
Ben Hunter wrote:
Adam Dexter wrote:R8: PAROTIDS!
Got that too (and 'traipsed'), though if I was on the show I'd declare 'parodist' even though I got parotids first.
Why? Parotids is a fancier word!

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:58 pm
by Adam Dexter
Matt Morrison wrote:I still can't believe DANGERED isn't a word. Grr. Would have lost myself 8 points that round.
How would you use it?

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:59 pm
by Matt Morrison
Adam Dexter wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:I still can't believe DANGERED isn't a word. Grr. Would have lost myself 8 points that round.
How would you use it?
As a lazy alternative to ENDANGERED, obviously. :)

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:01 pm
by Adam Dexter
Matt Morrison wrote:
Adam Dexter wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:I still can't believe DANGERED isn't a word. Grr. Would have lost myself 8 points that round.
How would you use it?
As a lazy alternative to ENDANGERED, obviously. :)
Haha it should be allowed in view of the fact that Endangered is too long.. poor word!

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:07 pm
by Martin Gardner
A pretty good game. A slow start, but I thought ASCRIBES was the spot of the day, as the obvious -ERS ending doesn't get you more than seven.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:08 pm
by Adam Dexter
R13: F'in Loricate... I saw Lorica... but did nae ken you could put 'te' on the end

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:10 pm
by Matt Morrison
Martin Gardner wrote:A pretty good game. A slow start, but I thought ASCRIBES was the spot of the day, as the obvious -ERS ending doesn't get you more than seven.
I got ASCRIBES, and then one round later could only get COATED in the LEOTARD round which is fucking embarrassing. I'm frustratingly on/off at the moment.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:13 pm
by Karen Pearson
BRASSICA for another 8 and also GARDENED (if I've remembered the letters correctly).

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:15 pm
by Junaid Mubeen
I got STOMATE, IDOLATER and TENUTO as equallers. It was almost a relief to see that the contestants weren't particularly awesome, as the Bevatron Express will surely be putting paid to their challenge anyway.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:19 pm
by Jimmy Gough
RENEGADO always reminds me of Conor. Good game, they're lucky they weren't Bevinsed.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:21 pm
by Joseph Bolas
Karen Pearson wrote:BRASSICA for another 8 and also GARDENED (if I've remembered the letters correctly).
The letters were: A O E R N G D E D, so GARDENED will be acceptable :D

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:43 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Jimmy Gough wrote:RENEGADO always reminds me of Conor.
Me too. Did you notice the guy was looking at the letters board for the conundrum. I've seen an opponents of Kai do this too. The clock starts and they don't look startled or anything, then when the buzzer goes they realise the conundrum has already been shown and can be seen directly on the opposite side of the studio, or, more easily, on the TV screen built into the desk in front of you.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:54 pm
by Martin Gardner
The solver got VEXILLA for the MAILED round, I'm not claiming it personally.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:44 pm
by Tracey Lilly
got BEMOANS, PAROTIDS and DERANGED.
Also spotted BRASSICA in the ASCRIBES round but in my dictionary it is capitalised so it would have been disallowed unless it has changed.

Another solution for 364.
25+8+3 = 36 times 10 = 360 + 4.

A closely fought and enjoyable game today.

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:05 am
by Chris Davies
Tracey Lilly wrote:got BEMOANS, PAROTIDS and DERANGED.
Also spotted BRASSICA in the ASCRIBES round but in my dictionary it is capitalised so it would have been disallowed unless it has changed.

Another solution for 364.
25+8+3 = 36 times 10 = 360 + 4.

A closely fought and enjoyable game today.
BRASSICA is fine, my mum spotted it and I had never heard of it!

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:53 am
by Adam Dexter
Tracey Lilly wrote: Also spotted BRASSICA in the ASCRIBES round but in my dictionary it is capitalised so it would have been disallowed unless it has changed.
You've also capitalised it on this lol... nothing relevant to add, so I'll be quiet now...

Re: Spoiler for Thurs 26/2/09

Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:03 pm
by Julie T
The one OT I got, that hasn't already been mentioned, is ARTICLED in round 13.

Because of Neil's run, I hadn't beaten both contestants since the 12th Feb, so was great to win by at least a 30 point margin against both. :)