Countdown rules
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Countdown rules
I know on here we talk a lot about the rules, but how many of us have actually seen a paper copy of them? And as Julie once pointed out, they're not on the Internet either. Since I was a stand-by for the Series I was in, I never actually received the contestant guidelines. Like for instance, viewers get annoyed if you say 'please' after every letter, which I did, because I had never read the guidelines!
Does anyone think maybe they could scan them and turn them into a pdf?
I hope this is a good topic for my 1000th post.
Does anyone think maybe they could scan them and turn them into a pdf?
I hope this is a good topic for my 1000th post.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
Re: Countdown rules
I had no idea that you had to have 3-5 vowels until Jeff said so. If the first two letters were T and R, I would want to go with all vowels afterwards to try and get etaerio (the most likely 7 letter word in Scrabble).
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: Countdown rules
I suppose the rules for the numbers are quite well known. Interestingly, I used to think it was illegal to go over 1000 until I saw someone do it. I've even seen someone declare 1000 on a 999 game (was it against DOD?).
The letters games are really tricky, and there's definitely some dispute about what the rules allow, and what they don't. A prime example if NAILERY, which is listed as a noun but it doesn't specify the -ies ending like it does for say, baby. So NAILERYS really ought to be allowed, even if it is insane. Plus there's FUNNEST/FUNEST. It's one syllable, so you can automatically have a comparative and a superlative, but it doesn't say that you double the N. Although that is the normal rule for words ending single-vowel-consonant. So technically it's hard to come up with an argument to disallow FUNEST while the rules are as they are (as I believe them to be, I mean). You could argue it's ridiculous, and granted it is, but I personally wouldn't disallow it just because of that.
The letters games are really tricky, and there's definitely some dispute about what the rules allow, and what they don't. A prime example if NAILERY, which is listed as a noun but it doesn't specify the -ies ending like it does for say, baby. So NAILERYS really ought to be allowed, even if it is insane. Plus there's FUNNEST/FUNEST. It's one syllable, so you can automatically have a comparative and a superlative, but it doesn't say that you double the N. Although that is the normal rule for words ending single-vowel-consonant. So technically it's hard to come up with an argument to disallow FUNEST while the rules are as they are (as I believe them to be, I mean). You could argue it's ridiculous, and granted it is, but I personally wouldn't disallow it just because of that.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Ian Fitzpatrick
- Devotee
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:23 pm
- Location: Wimborne, Dorset
Re: Countdown rules
At least with Susie in DC all the time there is more chance of consistency than when they used to rotate the lexicographer, or is Damian so quick on the earpiece?
I thought I was good at Countdown until I joined this forum
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Countdown rules
Wikipedia has a copy of the rules!
Re: Countdown rules
I was reading in the paper the other day how Wikipedia often gets information wrong, in fact, it made it sound like you can hardly believe a word you read in it!
Re: Countdown rules
People do sometimes make jokes in articles, and companies occasionally delete things that they want to keep quiet, but the vast majority of information on wikipedia is right, and most of it is referenced. That's just not much of a story.
- Ben Wilson
- Legend
- Posts: 4549
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
- Location: North Hykeham
Re: Countdown rules
...next to OTARINE.Roxanne wrote:etaerio (the most likely 7 letter word in Scrabble).
Maybe the rules can be incorporated into the FAQ somehow?
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3969
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Countdown rules
Oh noes, anyone would think the Mail had an axe to grind. Facts - who needs 'em!AnnieHall wrote:I was reading in the paper the other day how Wikipedia often gets information wrong, in fact, it made it sound like you can hardly believe a word you read in it!
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: Countdown rules
Yeah but we really need a photocopy of the official rules that get given to contestants before they appear. Maybe Neil, Kate, Kirk or someone who's been in this series can photocopy them and turn them into a pdf.Ben Wilson wrote:...next to OTARINE.Roxanne wrote:etaerio (the most likely 7 letter word in Scrabble).
Maybe the rules can be incorporated into the FAQ somehow?
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Countdown rules
Now, I feel bad but I shouldn't worry! It's not the end of the world!
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13324
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Countdown rules
You're not allowed fractions, even in your working out stage, and I don't know if that's well known. I think John Ashmore tried it in a game once.Martin Gardner wrote:I suppose the rules for the numbers are quite well known.
But as I explained here - http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 553#p12553 - you can disallow FUNNER and FUNNEST on the basis that if the N was doubled it would be listed, and you can disallow FUNER and FUNEST on the basis that in the usage box, it says that the comparative and superlative would be FUNNER and FUNNEST.Plus there's FUNNEST/FUNEST. It's one syllable, so you can automatically have a comparative and a superlative, but it doesn't say that you double the N. Although that is the normal rule for words ending single-vowel-consonant. So technically it's hard to come up with an argument to disallow FUNEST while the rules are as they are (as I believe them to be, I mean). You could argue it's ridiculous, and granted it is, but I personally wouldn't disallow it just because of that.
- Ian Fitzpatrick
- Devotee
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:23 pm
- Location: Wimborne, Dorset
Re: Countdown rules
I don't see why not, I often do at home just to confuse SWMBO!Gavin Chipper wrote:You're not allowed fractions, even in your working out stage, and I don't know if that's well known. I think John Ashmore tried it in a game once.Martin Gardner wrote:I suppose the rules for the numbers are quite well known.
I thought I was good at Countdown until I joined this forum
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Countdown rules
Can you elucidate as to a situation where this might be disallowed? E.g. if you're trying to make 156 from 100, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, one way would be to say "3 over 4 times 100 is 75, times 2 is 150 and add 6". 3/4 is a fraction, but since what you're saying is equivalent to "3 x 100 / 4", what difference does it make?Gavin Chipper wrote:You're not allowed fractions, even in your working out stage
Re: Countdown rules
You couldn't, for example, say "8*(100+1/4) = 802".Phil Reynolds wrote:Can you elucidate as to a situation where this might be disallowed? E.g. if you're trying to make 156 from 100, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, one way would be to say "3 over 4 times 100 is 75, times 2 is 150 and add 6". 3/4 is a fraction, but since what you're saying is equivalent to "3 x 100 / 4", what difference does it make?Gavin Chipper wrote:You're not allowed fractions, even in your working out stage
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Countdown rules
Nice example. I wish you could use fractions and decimals. Sometimes with 4 larges I'm like 0.5 away which is so close. Would beat someone "just" 1 away.Jon Corby wrote: You couldn't, for example, say "8*(100+1/4) = 802".
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Countdown rules
Countdown rules? OK.
(DO YOU SEE WHAT I DID THAR?)
(DO YOU SEE WHAT I DID THAR?)
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Countdown rules
Funny, but not nearly as funny as your new status.Michael Wallace wrote:Countdown rules? OK.
Ooh, my 666th post. Bet Damian would be jealous.
Re: Countdown rules
Larsen already did that joke, if you look further up. But his was more subtle.Michael Wallace wrote:Countdown rules? OK.
(DO YOU SEE WHAT I DID THAR?)
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Countdown rules
Cocks.Jon Corby wrote:Larsen already did that joke, if you look further up. But his was more subtle.
(OMG I'm going on about them *again*!!!)
Re: Countdown rules
Great idea!Martin Gardner wrote:Yeah but we really need a photocopy of the official rules that get given to contestants before they appear. Maybe Neil, Kate, Kirk or someone who's been in this series can photocopy them and turn them into a pdf.Ben Wilson wrote:
Maybe the rules can be incorporated into the FAQ somehow?
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:12 pm
- Location: Eastbourne
Re: Countdown rules
Yes, that was me. Unfortunately David did solve it. I always thought the 999 target was a bit spooky/dodgy, as Trudie Goodwin from The Bill was in dictionary corner.Martin Gardner wrote:Interestingly, I used to think it was illegal to go over 1000 until I saw someone do it. I've even seen someone declare 1000 on a 999 game (was it against DOD?).
Re: Countdown rules
Yeah, but how is Trudie connected to the Fire Brigade?Martin Smith wrote:Yes, that was me. Unfortunately David did solve it. I always thought the 999 target was a bit spooky/dodgy, as Trudie Goodwin from The Bill was in dictionary corner.Martin Gardner wrote:Interestingly, I used to think it was illegal to go over 1000 until I saw someone do it. I've even seen someone declare 1000 on a 999 game (was it against DOD?).
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Countdown rules
You're talking about Hypercountdown!
Had it not been for Charlie and apterous.org, we would never have even heard of it!
I know what a success this forum has become!
Had it not been for Charlie and apterous.org, we would never have even heard of it!
I know what a success this forum has become!
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: Countdown rules
I've managed to find a pretty brief summary of the rules I was sent when I was a contestant - however I've scanned them and they're at my mum's house, so I won't have access to them until Friday. They're actually quite well written, using phrases like "often, usually, normally" to avoid the situation where they'd have to allow something like NAILERYS.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?