Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed! *UPDATE: NOW FIXED*
Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed! *UPDATE: NOW FIXED*
It has come to my attention that comparative and superlative forms of adjectives (ending in -y, especially) listed under derivatives in Oxford Dictionaries Premium have been removed!
Just a few examples; MOPIER and MOPIEST, OAKIER and OAKIEST, OATIER and OATIEST, FUMIER and FUMIEST - search for these and you’ll find they’re all gone.
I don’t know why they’ve all been removed. Is it because they are not used enough in current English, compared to the headwords themselves?
If a headword is an adjective with more than one syllable, the comparative and superlative forms must be listed to be allowed in Countdown, and yet the said words are all reasonable. Going by the rules, they will have to be removed from the Apterous lexicon too, but I think it does raise a question: is it now time to relax the rule to accept -IER and -IEST forms of -Y and -EY headwords by default, regardless of them being in the dictionary? Unspecified -EDER and -EDEST words are probably better off excluded for now, but it’s so easy to use -IER and -IEST when comparing two things, they appear to be so meritable.
Just a few examples; MOPIER and MOPIEST, OAKIER and OAKIEST, OATIER and OATIEST, FUMIER and FUMIEST - search for these and you’ll find they’re all gone.
I don’t know why they’ve all been removed. Is it because they are not used enough in current English, compared to the headwords themselves?
If a headword is an adjective with more than one syllable, the comparative and superlative forms must be listed to be allowed in Countdown, and yet the said words are all reasonable. Going by the rules, they will have to be removed from the Apterous lexicon too, but I think it does raise a question: is it now time to relax the rule to accept -IER and -IEST forms of -Y and -EY headwords by default, regardless of them being in the dictionary? Unspecified -EDER and -EDEST words are probably better off excluded for now, but it’s so easy to use -IER and -IEST when comparing two things, they appear to be so meritable.
Last edited by Philip A on Mon Mar 20, 2023 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Series 78 Runner-up
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13312
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
I always thought -IER and -IEST should be allowed by default but I think it might be more of a dictionary thing than a Countdown thing. The single syllable adjective rule comes from the dictionary notes I think (or used to anyway) so they ought to extend the notes.
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
So are most agent nouns in some context, but many of those aren't specified (e.g. invoicer, tightener, deployer, ...) and we're used to that.
Perhaps adjectives that don't have their own entry, and are instead only mentioned as derivatives of a noun, are rare enough that the comparatives and superlatives are even rarer so don't make the cut?
Edit to add: you want to be careful about changing the rules to allow things we assume are reasonable. Ask yourself, would such a change have any basis in whether the words are in common usage, or is it just to make the game easier? Many moons ago, Countdown had a blanket "agent nouns are allowed" rule, but then one day that meant they had to allow DOMINATER.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13312
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
The blanket rule that allowed "dominater" would have been badly thought out though. It should be DOMINATOR, and not because it's a special case. ATE -> ATOR is the standard method.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
Was it a blanket rule, or was it just the whims of the lexicographer on duty that day? DROSSIER was allowed by Damian Eadie; Susie Dent disallowed LAMENTOR and ABORTER in the same series, but Mark Nyman offered TORRIDEST only a few months prior.Graeme Cole wrote: ↑Sat Feb 04, 2023 6:31 pmSo are most agent nouns in some context, but many of those aren't specified (e.g. invoicer, tightener, deployer, ...) and we're used to that.
Perhaps adjectives that don't have their own entry, and are instead only mentioned as derivatives of a noun, are rare enough that the comparatives and superlatives are even rarer so don't make the cut?
Edit to add: you want to be careful about changing the rules to allow things we assume are reasonable. Ask yourself, would such a change have any basis in whether the words are in common usage, or is it just to make the game easier? Many moons ago, Countdown had a blanket "agent nouns are allowed" rule, but then one day that meant they had to allow DOMINATER.
Of course, there's also the changing practices of lexicographers within themselves as Susie Dent both allowed and disallowed NOUGATS within five years of each other.
There's loads of examples of inconsistent lexicography around the issues of comparatives and superlatives, as well as mass noun plurals (GUNFIRES, Catherine-Clarke-slash-Mark-Nyman-slash-Freda-Thornton? Seriously??). JOINDERS by Richard Samson is particularly egregious, coming just a few weeks after NOUGATS was disallowed.
Basically, it's all a mess and we can't really look to the past (pre-2003) days for one lexicographer and one consistent set of rules.
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
Even if you apply that method, over-general rules such as these have more holes than a cheese grator.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sat Feb 04, 2023 7:20 pm The blanket rule that allowed "dominater" would have been badly thought out though. It should be DOMINATOR, and not because it's a special case. ATE -> ATOR is the standard method.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
This reminds me of a conversation I had with an American about the various spellings and he responded with the "overly British" sentence of:Graeme Cole wrote: ↑Sat Feb 04, 2023 9:34 pmEven if you apply that method, over-general rules such as these have more holes than a cheese grator.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sat Feb 04, 2023 7:20 pm The blanket rule that allowed "dominater" would have been badly thought out though. It should be DOMINATOR, and not because it's a special case. ATE -> ATOR is the standard method.
"Fuque, I left my chequebook at the cheque-in corridour at the aeropourt!"
Last edited by Rhys Benjamin on Sat Feb 04, 2023 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13312
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
And did you ask what his mom had made him for lonch, or perhaps was he not very hongry?
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13312
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
Nice example. But presumably it would only apply when another word isn't already specified (we don't allow "goodest"). But yeah, I tend to agree anyway. These things need to be thought through properly.Graeme Cole wrote: ↑Sat Feb 04, 2023 9:34 pmEven if you apply that method, over-general rules such as these have more holes than a cheese grator.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sat Feb 04, 2023 7:20 pm The blanket rule that allowed "dominater" would have been badly thought out though. It should be DOMINATOR, and not because it's a special case. ATE -> ATOR is the standard method.
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
Well that's a fun development for anyone filming soon
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
It's not so much about whether the word is reasonable. If OAKIER and OAKIEST are not specified that isn't because the comparative and superlative are unreasonable, it's because they think that correct and common usage is MORE and MOST OAKY. Which is nonsense.
In the olden days there was the situation that, say, HARDIEST and TARDIEST were specified, but LARDIEST wasn't. The reason was that HARDY and TARDY had their own entries, but LARDY was a derivative of LARD. The dictionary at the time gave no information at all about derivatives. By saying nothing the inference was that MOST LARDY was correct usage. Are we going back to that?
In the olden days there was the situation that, say, HARDIEST and TARDIEST were specified, but LARDIEST wasn't. The reason was that HARDY and TARDY had their own entries, but LARDY was a derivative of LARD. The dictionary at the time gave no information at all about derivatives. By saying nothing the inference was that MOST LARDY was correct usage. Are we going back to that?
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13312
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
Since it's derivatives specifically, it's obviously nothing to do with usage, but some weird reversion to a more primative state of the dictionary.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
Here we go, found that sentence in full at last:Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sat Feb 04, 2023 9:46 pm And did you ask what his mom had made him for lonch, or perhaps was he not very hongry?
(To the tune of 1001 Nights)
Fuque I left my cheque back at the cheque-in
Inside the aeroport
The courridour of Brito-Xian Aeroways
I board the aeroplane
And I will buy a light, through aeromail tonight!
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 9:24 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
Any discussion about it?dan spinks wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 7:32 pmthis has already cropped up in at least one episode in the can but yet to be aired
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 9:24 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
I'll comment on it properly after it airs in a few weeks
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:28 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
OUP have said these words and others haven't been 'removed' as such - there's a software bug that is preventing them from showing.
They're still in the database and they're working on the technical side to fix things. We had to disallow PEATIEST recently and after raising a query, the glitch was discovered.
They're still in the database and they're working on the technical side to fix things. We had to disallow PEATIEST recently and after raising a query, the glitch was discovered.
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
Thanks for clarifying, the bug is interesting. Just for clarity, while they’re working on fixing it, should these hidden -IER/-IEST inflections of -y adjectives under any derivatives heading remain valid and on Apterous for now? Full list here https://www.apterous.org/ticket_view.php?ticket=6641 Also interested to know whether giving PEATIEST invalid was reversed and the word was then accepted.Dame Eadie wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 11:30 am OUP have said these words and others haven't been 'removed' as such - there's a software bug that is preventing them from showing.
They're still in the database and they're working on the technical side to fix things. We had to disallow PEATIEST recently and after raising a query, the glitch was discovered.
Series 78 Runner-up
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:28 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
Not sure any more clarity is needed. I've already outlined the situation and hopefully made it clear it's a website technical issue. No more action is needed.Philip A wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 1:54 pmThanks for clarifying, the bug is interesting. Just for clarity, while they’re working on fixing it, should these hidden -IER/-IEST inflections of -y adjectives under any derivatives heading remain valid and on Apterous for now? Full list here https://www.apterous.org/ticket_view.php?ticket=6641
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
website is shite tho - how wedded are c4/countdown to OUP?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:28 pm
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
Is it definitely only an issue for comparatives and superlatives of derivatives, or one affecting derivatives generally? There used to be several aspects of derivatives needing some dictionary corner common sense input because there was no information in the dictionary.
I remember coming across "Derivative NAILERY (noun)" once. Is that a mass noun? Didn't say. Is it a place they make nails, or the craft of making them, or both (like POTTERY)? Didn't say. There's also alternative spellings. Might you have to disallow ANODISER, which didn't used to be actually specified as an alternative spelling of ANODIZER?
I remember coming across "Derivative NAILERY (noun)" once. Is that a mass noun? Didn't say. Is it a place they make nails, or the craft of making them, or both (like POTTERY)? Didn't say. There's also alternative spellings. Might you have to disallow ANODISER, which didn't used to be actually specified as an alternative spelling of ANODIZER?
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
I think this specific bug as described is only affecting the -IER/-IEST inflections under derivates, instead of all derivatives in general. I agree that lack of definitions and lack of countability clarification under the derivatives section is annoying, but re NAILERY, Googling describes it as a nail factory and therefore suggests it is countable (nails are made in naileries). POTTERY can also be the craft (uncountable) or a factory (countable). Alternative spellings are not affected and ANODISER, which is listed, is fine; any -IZE(R) Oxford spelling can take the -ISE(R) spelling even if unspecified (but not vice versa).David Williams wrote: ↑Thu Feb 16, 2023 8:41 am Is it definitely only an issue for comparatives and superlatives of derivatives, or one affecting derivatives generally? There used to be several aspects of derivatives needing some dictionary corner common sense input because there was no information in the dictionary.
I remember coming across "Derivative NAILERY (noun)" once. Is that a mass noun? Didn't say. Is it a place they make nails, or the craft of making them, or both (like POTTERY)? Didn't say. There's also alternative spellings. Might you have to disallow ANODISER, which didn't used to be actually specified as an alternative spelling of ANODIZER?
Series 78 Runner-up
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
FWIW the API is still returning the inflections - checked a few and they seem to all be there. Also checked blurry and gammy at Ray's suggestion and they do not return inflections, so appears to match what was on the website and is in apto.
Code: Select all
{
"id": "flamy",
"metadata": {
"operation": "retrieve",
"provider": "Oxford University Press",
"schema": "RetrieveEntry"
},
"results": [
{
"id": "flamy",
"language": "en-gb",
"lexicalEntries": [
{
"derivativeOf": [
{
"id": "flame",
"text": "flame"
}
],
"entries": [
{
"inflections": [
{
"inflectedForm": "flamier"
},
{
"inflectedForm": "flamiest"
}
],
"senses": [
{
"id": "m_en_gbus0368730.060"
}
],
"variantForms": [
{
"text": "flamey"
}
]
}
],
"language": "en-gb",
"lexicalCategory": {
"id": "adjective",
"text": "Adjective"
},
"text": "flamy"
}
],
"type": "headword",
"word": "flamy"
}
],
"word": "flamy"
}
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13312
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Comparatives and Superlatives of Adjectives Under ‘Derivatives’ Removed!
Important news: the bug has now been fixed and the -IER/-IEST words are now back in Oxford Dictionaries Premium.
Series 78 Runner-up